Perhaps it's because you can never see both of her hands at one time.
ErrrrrrrRAARRRRRRRRrrrrrrrrrr. RRrrrrr. posted by icetaco at 7:33 AM on November 5, 2004
How can something so wrong feel so right? posted by Pretty_Generic at 7:39 AM on November 5, 2004
I was thinking that maybe the blender was programmed to match the 'pitch' of its blending with the woman's? I assumed since the video is on an MIT site it was some kind of geek experiment. posted by ao4047 at 7:56 AM on November 5, 2004
......only at MIT posted by bkdelong at 8:00 AM on November 5, 2004
This is why I visit Metafilter. posted by aaronshaf at 8:14 AM on November 5, 2004
If this turns you on, maybe you should look to David Lynch for your pornographic needs. posted by picea at 8:28 AM on November 5, 2004
The participant empathizes with Blendie 2000 and in this new approach to a domestic appliance fosters a more conscious and personally meaningful and responsible relationship with machines. And it is fun. posted by adampsyche at 8:40 AM on November 5, 2004
well she put me through some changes, lord
sort of like a Waring blender
Warren Zevon prophesied all. posted by luser at 8:43 AM on November 5, 2004
I think such technology could change the world for the better. Who'd drive Humvees or shoot machine-guns if the user had to go "vrrrrrrrm vrrrrm" and "budda budda budda" to make them work? posted by raygirvan at 8:55 AM on November 5, 2004
this was pretty hot. and those ankles--hubba hubba. posted by lotsofno at 9:04 AM on November 5, 2004
That's one of the strangest things I've seen on the internets in a while, and that's saying something.
Is it wrong that I find this strangely erotic?
No, no it's not. posted by majcher at 9:12 AM on November 5, 2004
monju_b., I enjoyed the link -- Machine Therapy reminded me of this old room fan I used to own that had a bad bearing in it -- its "wobble" oscillated perfectly in time to the Smiths' "How Soon is Now" and added a nice ambience. posted by alumshubby at 11:16 AM on November 5, 2004
Is it wrong that I find this strangely erotic?
Are you a blender? posted by zztzed at 12:22 PM on November 5, 2004
zztzed, that was beautiful.
Great link. The blue is back with a blender! posted by dabitch at 2:09 PM on November 5, 2004
The blender is not erotic to me, but the technology has possibilities. I am thinking of miniaturization and putting this in some "items" that could put a new spin into the sex life.
You just know Bjork is kicking herself for not coming up with this first. posted by skallas at 3:55 PM on November 5, 2004
I heart Kelly Dobson. posted by Tlogmer at 1:07 AM on November 7, 2004
fluffycreature, you mean the Audi-Oh? posted by Vidiot at 4:06 PM on November 7, 2004
Are there any women who find this at all erotic? Because I'm just not seeing it. posted by Dreama at 5:24 PM on November 7, 2004
well i just found it funny but i see the potential it has for being erotic... it's a relatively cute girl making guttural sounds and opening her mouth wide - that's gonna work for a lot of people, don't you think...? posted by t r a c y at 5:38 PM on November 7, 2004
« Older
Sidewalks without dog shit, angels, and Hustler: t...
| From the vantage point of my o...
Newer »
This thread has been archived and is closed to new comments
Perv.
posted by jpburns at 7:30 AM on November 5, 2004