<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
    xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
     xmlns:admin="http://webns.net/mvcb/"
     xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
     xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#">
	<channel> 

	<title>Comments on: William Gibson</title>
	<link>http://www.metafilter.com/36968/William-Gibson/</link>
	<description>Comments on MetaFilter post William Gibson</description>
	<pubDate>Sat, 13 Nov 2004 22:10:30 -0800</pubDate>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 13 Nov 2004 22:10:30 -0800</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en-us</language>
	<docs>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/tech/rss</docs>
	<ttl>60</ttl>

	<item>
		<title>William Gibson</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/36968/William-Gibson</link>	
		<description>&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.williamgibsonbooks.com/blog/archive.asp&quot;&gt;&lt;b&gt;William Gibson&apos;s blog is back.&lt;/b&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br&gt;
&lt;small&gt;So far, it&apos;s mostly about Bush and Osama bin Ladin. &quot;You know who would&apos;ve completely gotten OBL? Andy Warhol.&quot;&lt;/small&gt;</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">post:www.metafilter.com,2004:site.36968</guid>
		<pubDate>Sat, 13 Nov 2004 21:53:16 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Termite</dc:creator>		<category>blog</category>		<category>WilliamGibson</category>
	</item>	<item>
		<title>By: halonine</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/36968/William-Gibson#769147</link>	
		<description>Thanks for the heads up. So much for not him not blogging while working on books... unless he isn&apos;t working on a book!

And here I was waiting for a new one to come out before I checked the blog again.  His September 11th quote is excellent, though.</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:www.metafilter.com,2004:site.36968-769147</guid>
		<pubDate>Sat, 13 Nov 2004 22:10:30 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>halonine</dc:creator>
	</item>	<item>
		<title>By: adampsyche</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/36968/William-Gibson#769155</link>	
		<description>His last book so reminded me of mefi.</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:www.metafilter.com,2004:site.36968-769155</guid>
		<pubDate>Sun, 14 Nov 2004 09:54:13 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>adampsyche</dc:creator>
	</item>	<item>
		<title>By: matteo</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/36968/William-Gibson#769160</link>	
		<description>what&apos;s our footage, adampsyche? at least &lt;em&gt;we&lt;/em&gt; don&apos;t obsess about just one thing, luckily enough. that was an even more dysfunctional Internet community. and it also looked more boring than MeFi.</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:www.metafilter.com,2004:site.36968-769160</guid>
		<pubDate>Sun, 14 Nov 2004 10:00:41 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>matteo</dc:creator>
	</item>	<item>
		<title>By: Ayn Marx</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/36968/William-Gibson#769219</link>	
		<description>Given his ranting on how the youth vote was so going to rock the election and send Kerry to the White House, and how *none* of the polls were catching this because they were so clueless, he seems a lot better at predicting the future when he sticks to novels.

Seems a number of novelists started foaming at the mouth over the then up-coming election.  Not that there weren&apos;t plenty of things to get excited about, but it seems their ability to arrange words in a cogent, rational manner just vanished when they weren&apos;t describing make-believe worlds.

Maybe that&apos;s why they&apos;re fiction writers: they lack the wherewithall to rationally process reality.</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:www.metafilter.com,2004:site.36968-769219</guid>
		<pubDate>Sun, 14 Nov 2004 11:44:44 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Ayn Marx</dc:creator>
	</item>	<item>
		<title>By: MattD</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/36968/William-Gibson#769265</link>	
		<description>Ayn -- the evidence is quite clear that the youth vote &lt;i&gt;did&lt;/i&gt; come out in large numbers, and voted for Kerry by a fair margin, so the extent guys like Gibson predicted it, they were &lt;i&gt;right&lt;/i&gt;.  

However, Bush won for two reasons: Evangelicals turned out in large numbers, and Bush increased his vote considerably among high-earners.

This caught people of the Gibson type by surprise.  

They don&apos;t know any Evangelicals, so they didn&apos;t grasp the extent of their love for President Bush and their outrage at judges trying to impose a new social order.  

And it just was beyond their imaging that well-educated prosperous professionals would not care to see a lifelong tax-and-regulation loving pinko like John Kerry, and a job-and-business-destroying ambulance chaster like John Edwards get into office.</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:www.metafilter.com,2004:site.36968-769265</guid>
		<pubDate>Sun, 14 Nov 2004 13:27:18 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>MattD</dc:creator>
	</item>	<item>
		<title>By: andrew cooke</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/36968/William-Gibson#769270</link>	
		<description>the percentage of young voters stayed about the same.  more people turned out to vote generally, but there&apos;s nothing to show that efforts aimed at young voters were particularly effective.  saying &quot;young voters turned out in large numbers&quot; is true to extent that &quot;people of all ages turned out in large numbers&quot;.</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:www.metafilter.com,2004:site.36968-769270</guid>
		<pubDate>Sun, 14 Nov 2004 13:48:48 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>andrew cooke</dc:creator>
	</item>	<item>
		<title>By: matteo</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/36968/William-Gibson#769280</link>	
		<description>&lt;em&gt; outrage at judges trying to impose a new social order.
&lt;/em&gt;

well, the Enlightenment is not that &quot;new&quot;, actually. but I concede it&apos;s newer than the fundy&apos;s beloved Mosaic Law. Enlightenment&apos;s newer than Hammurabi, too (Hammurabi who, ironically, &lt;em&gt;did&lt;/em&gt; call himself &quot;the favorite of the gods&quot;. sounds familiar huh?) 

oh, and &quot;pinko&quot; is priceless.
do you still say things like &quot;Chappaquiddick&quot; as well?</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:www.metafilter.com,2004:site.36968-769280</guid>
		<pubDate>Sun, 14 Nov 2004 14:16:20 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>matteo</dc:creator>
	</item>	<item>
		<title>By: Satapher</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/36968/William-Gibson#769338</link>	
		<description>andy</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:www.metafilter.com,2004:site.36968-769338</guid>
		<pubDate>Sun, 14 Nov 2004 19:12:57 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Satapher</dc:creator>
	</item>	<item>
		<title>By: ChasFile</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/36968/William-Gibson#769392</link>	
		<description>This place has turned into one giant game of &quot;Six degrees of the damn election&quot;

1. William Gibson
2. Blog
3. Andy Warhol
4. Osama Bin Laden
5. Bush
6. Election

There, I did it!</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:www.metafilter.com,2004:site.36968-769392</guid>
		<pubDate>Sun, 14 Nov 2004 23:48:05 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>ChasFile</dc:creator>
	</item>	<item>
		<title>By: adampsyche</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/36968/William-Gibson#769431</link>	
		<description>&lt;em&gt; what&apos;s our footage, adampsyche? at least we don&apos;t obsess about just one thing, luckily enough. that was an even more dysfunctional Internet community. and it also looked more boring than MeFi.&lt;/em&gt;

I think you missed my point, but I most likely didn&apos;t explain it well. It wasn&apos;t how dysfunctional it was or what it was focused on, it was just the way that she related to a community, how different usernames come to symbolize different things (attitudes, &quot;movements&quot;, etc.) and how the members related and thought about each other. And that the person that she met looked nothing like she thought he would (forgive me, it&apos;s been a while, so I forgot their names).</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:www.metafilter.com,2004:site.36968-769431</guid>
		<pubDate>Mon, 15 Nov 2004 05:03:56 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>adampsyche</dc:creator>
	</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
