<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
    xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
     xmlns:admin="http://webns.net/mvcb/"
     xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
     xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#">
	<channel> 

	<title>Comments on: Yahoo now has co-branding</title>
	<link>http://www.metafilter.com/37/Yahoo-now-has-cobranding/</link>
	<description>Comments on MetaFilter post Yahoo now has co-branding</description>
	<pubDate></pubDate>
	<lastBuildDate></lastBuildDate>
	<language>en-us</language>
	<docs>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/tech/rss</docs>
	<ttl>60</ttl>

	<item>
		<title>Yahoo now has co-branding</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/37/Yahoo-now-has-cobranding</link>	
		<description>&lt;a href="http://pepto.yahoo.com/"&gt;Yahoo now has co-branding&lt;/a&gt; arrangements going on. I hate to see this trend continue, as I see it diluting the reputation of both companies. What&apos;s Pepto-Bismol got to do with teens having a fun summer? Anyone care to make the connection for me? What&apos;s next, Geritol sponsoring a site aimed at toddlers?</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">post:www.metafilter.com,1999:site.37</guid>
		<pubDate>Thu, 15 Jul 1999 17:59:40 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>mathowie</dc:creator>		<category>yahoo</category>		<category>peptobismol</category>		<category>advertising</category>
	</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
