Yes, FAIR, the Freedom Forum and many other groups are government watchdogs. But a more powerful Green Party would be more than a "watchdog." Watchdog groups get media coverage and rant and rail about all types of things to whoever listens, and God love 'em for it. But watchdog groups are simply not political parties. So a Democrat, for example, is not going to be worried about losing votes to someone from FAIR in any election anytime soon. And FAIR's audience may be quite marginal among that election's voters--meaning that the candidate can blow off anything FAIR says and not take a hit in the votes. But that same Dem could be worried about a Green Party candidate in the same race, and could be moved to address some issues he/she usually wouldn't, or adopt some of the Green rhetoric (as I think Gore has done in his populist talk this campaign).
That kind of competition has advantages that ranting/railing doesn't.
Another thing: I don't think Nader is going to win this election.
Even he doesn't. Now, if I seriously thought he was going to win, I'd definitely be worried about his ability to lead. He'd obviously have a tough time building enough of a coalition in Congress to get things done. (There's an understatement!)
However, if Nader really did think he could win, I think he'd be concentrating more earnestly on convincing voters that he could lead, just like Bush and Gore have been trying to do. So I might feel better about him, in that alternate universe. Of course, the pressure of actually, possibly winning might also make for a more pragmatic Nader that we supporters wouldn't like as much. Maybe, for now, we should be happy that he doesn't stand a chance. We can have our granola and eat it, too, eh?
posted by nedlog at 8:52 PM on October 22, 2000
« Older Group photo from the last MeFi lunch get-together.... | Now I know fathers want their ... Newer »
This thread has been archived and is closed to new comments
posted by bluishorange at 11:57 PM on October 20, 2000