<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
    xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
     xmlns:admin="http://webns.net/mvcb/"
     xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
     xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#">
	<channel> 

	<title>Comments on: Comments on 3824</title>
	<link>http://www.metafilter.com/3824//</link>
	<description>Comments on MetaFilter post Comments on 3824</description>
	<pubDate>Mon, 23 Oct 2000 07:25:43 -0800</pubDate>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 23 Oct 2000 07:25:43 -0800</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en-us</language>
	<docs>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/tech/rss</docs>
	<ttl>60</ttl>

	<item>
		<title>Post number 3824</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/3824/</link>	
		<description>&lt;a href="http://www.arch.ced.berkeley.edu/kap/"&gt;Kite aerial photography&lt;/a&gt; is basically hanging a remote controlled camera off a kite string and shooting pics high above the ground at random. How &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.arch.ced.berkeley.edu/kap/images/ccbggb.jpg&quot;&gt;this guy&lt;/a&gt; gets such &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.arch.ced.berkeley.edu/kap/gallery/gallery.html&quot;&gt;great shots&lt;/a&gt; is beyond me. It&apos;s amazing photography you probably haven&apos;t seen before.</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">post:www.metafilter.com,2000:site.3824</guid>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 Oct 2000 00:35:29 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>mathowie</dc:creator>		<category>aerialphotography</category>		<category>kites</category>
	</item>	<item>
		<title>By: aladfar</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/3824/#25281</link>	
		<description>Wow, those are really impressive!

I tried this once, and didn&apos;t have much success.  I think it&apos;s because most kite photography setups are on the cheap side - cheap kite, cheap camera, etc.

This guy has obviously had a lot of practice, but I bet he&apos;s spent a fair amount of money too . . . </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:www.metafilter.com,2000:site.3824-25281</guid>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 Oct 2000 07:25:43 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>aladfar</dc:creator>
	</item>	<item>
		<title>By: plinth</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/3824/#25286</link>	
		<description>&lt;I&gt;This guy has obviously had a lot of practice&lt;/I&gt;

This is clear.  He&apos;s shot over 100 rolls of film with these rigs.  I found this site about 4 years ago when I was trying to do a similar thing with a small hot air balloon.  He&apos;s gotten better.</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:www.metafilter.com,2000:site.3824-25286</guid>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 Oct 2000 08:05:22 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>plinth</dc:creator>
	</item>	<item>
		<title>By: CrayDrygu</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/3824/#25288</link>	
		<description>Aww, that&apos;s nothin&apos;.  Check out the Astrocam Rocket at the top of &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.americaworks.net/toys/airplanes.html&quot;&gt;this page&lt;/a&gt;.  Load it with film, and it&apos;ll take a picture of the ground roughly at apogee.  I&apos;ve never seen any shots taken with one of these aside from the promotional ones in the catalog, but if they&apos;re any indication, they&apos;re a lot better quality than the kite ones.  Besides, I personally think a picture-taking rocket is cooler than a picture-taking kite, but that&apos;s me.

I have one of these astrocam rockets in my garage, never been used.  Maybe I should dust it off, and try and find my launch pad...</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:www.metafilter.com,2000:site.3824-25288</guid>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 Oct 2000 08:10:06 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>CrayDrygu</dc:creator>
	</item>	<item>
		<title>By: Julian King</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/3824/#25294</link>	
		<description>I agree... a truly excellent photo, especially the picture of Alcatraz.

Is a pity that Alcatraz isn&apos;t a bit bigger, because it would provide a convient venue for the impounding of all American terrorists. 

Yes, uncle Sammies, what I am saying is that you live in a terrorist state, from dubya Bush all the way down to the crack dealers on your street corner.

When the revolution comes, kite flyers like ours truly will be OK, but the majority of you bourgeois fools will be yearning for an escape across the Golden Gate bridge!

Vive la Revolution!</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:www.metafilter.com,2000:site.3824-25294</guid>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 Oct 2000 09:17:59 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Julian King</dc:creator>
	</item>	<item>
		<title>By: Mocata</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/3824/#25299</link>	
		<description>I&apos;ll thank you, King, to keep your depraved views to yourself.  

If you like communism so much, go and live in Canada.  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:www.metafilter.com,2000:site.3824-25299</guid>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 Oct 2000 09:36:51 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Mocata</dc:creator>
	</item>	<item>
		<title>By: Julian King</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/3824/#25301</link>	
		<description>I tried that, but there were too many bears (geddit?) there for my liking</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:www.metafilter.com,2000:site.3824-25301</guid>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 Oct 2000 09:39:06 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Julian King</dc:creator>
	</item>	<item>
		<title>By: ethmar</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/3824/#25304</link>	
		<description>&lt;i&gt;If you like communism so much, go and live in Canada. &lt;/i&gt;

Canada&apos;s pretty sneaky. They disguised their Godless Communism&#8482; as Capitalism, and at times Socialism.

Also, Alcatraz makes for a terrible prison, therefore it&apos;s little more than a tourist stop.</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:www.metafilter.com,2000:site.3824-25304</guid>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 Oct 2000 09:45:00 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>ethmar</dc:creator>
	</item>	<item>
		<title>By: Dean_Paxton</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/3824/#25315</link>	
		<description>You know, I remember talking with a guy who did this sort of thing for the Army.  They flew much bigger RC planes and used the cameras for guidance as well as surveillance.  They had IR cameras as well as directional microphones, I&apos;d imagine.  I remember thinking at the time, how cool it would be to just for grabbing pretty pictures.</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:www.metafilter.com,2000:site.3824-25315</guid>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 Oct 2000 11:15:16 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Dean_Paxton</dc:creator>
	</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
