<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
    xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
     xmlns:admin="http://webns.net/mvcb/"
     xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
     xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#">
	<channel> 

	<title>Comments on: Game Theory Resource</title>
	<link>http://www.metafilter.com/38305/Game-Theory-Resource/</link>
	<description>Comments on MetaFilter post Game Theory Resource</description>
	<pubDate>Mon, 03 Jan 2005 04:24:09 -0800</pubDate>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 03 Jan 2005 04:24:09 -0800</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en-us</language>
	<docs>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/tech/rss</docs>
	<ttl>60</ttl>

	<item>
		<title>Game Theory Resource</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/38305/Game-Theory-Resource</link>	
		<description>&lt;a href="http://gametheory.net"&gt;Game Theory.&lt;/a&gt; </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">post:www.metafilter.com,2005:site.38305</guid>
		<pubDate>Mon, 03 Jan 2005 04:05:28 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Gyan</dc:creator>		<category>mathematics</category>		<category>resource</category>		<category>gametheory</category>
	</item>	<item>
		<title>By: pxe2000</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/38305/Game-Theory-Resource#812989</link>	
		<description>also, &lt;a href=http://www.loudfamily.com/game.html&gt;game theory&lt;/a&gt;.</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:www.metafilter.com,2005:site.38305-812989</guid>
		<pubDate>Mon, 03 Jan 2005 04:24:09 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>pxe2000</dc:creator>
	</item>	<item>
		<title>By: XQUZYPHYR</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/38305/Game-Theory-Resource#812991</link>	
		<description>Ugh.  I took the Game Theory course at NYU where Steven Brams (listed several times in the books section) was teaching it.  If you ever want to enjoy the feeling roughly equivalent to that of pressing your thumbs against your temples for ninety minutes twice a week, go for it.</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:www.metafilter.com,2005:site.38305-812991</guid>
		<pubDate>Mon, 03 Jan 2005 04:26:52 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>XQUZYPHYR</dc:creator>
	</item>	<item>
		<title>By: yerfatma</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/38305/Game-Theory-Resource#813023</link>	
		<description>YMMV. Game Theory was one of, if not the, most enjoyable classes of my econ degree. That sounds like damning with faint praise, I&apos;m sure, but I think it&apos;s fascinating stuff. The Wikipedia provides a &lt;a href=&quot;http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Game_theory&quot;&gt;good background&lt;/a&gt; on the subject.</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:www.metafilter.com,2005:site.38305-813023</guid>
		<pubDate>Mon, 03 Jan 2005 07:08:39 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>yerfatma</dc:creator>
	</item>	<item>
		<title>By: fatbaq</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/38305/Game-Theory-Resource#813031</link>	
		<description>&lt;a href=&quot;http://slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=134685&amp;cid=11242709&quot;&gt;this&lt;/a&gt; comment on slashdot, regarding the Google interview process, turned me on to the site.. very interesting stuff!</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:www.metafilter.com,2005:site.38305-813031</guid>
		<pubDate>Mon, 03 Jan 2005 07:27:26 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>fatbaq</dc:creator>
	</item>	<item>
		<title>By: u.n. owen</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/38305/Game-Theory-Resource#813032</link>	
		<description>Oh god, steven brams&apos;s books are so fucking good it&apos;s unbelievable.  I was lapping that up as a sophomore in high school for a state math competition (ok, I was a dork, what&apos;s your point?).  His Theory of Moves and a lot of his other books helped me get one of the best scores in the state, woohoo!  I found his texts easy to understand and very well-written, even at age 13.

Is he just not as good in person?</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:www.metafilter.com,2005:site.38305-813032</guid>
		<pubDate>Mon, 03 Jan 2005 07:28:13 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>u.n. owen</dc:creator>
	</item>	<item>
		<title>By: elpapacito</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/38305/Game-Theory-Resource#813069</link>	
		<description>XQU did you by chance start reading papers looking for sekret communist communications did you ?</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:www.metafilter.com,2005:site.38305-813069</guid>
		<pubDate>Mon, 03 Jan 2005 08:05:20 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>elpapacito</dc:creator>
	</item>	<item>
		<title>By: lodurr</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/38305/Game-Theory-Resource#813080</link>	
		<description>Of course, one of the big problems with game theory as a predictive mechanism is that outcomes become much less predictable once the subjects learn about game theory.

Another problem is that it&apos;s not always clear whether a particular theory references real-world behavior or idealized, rational behavior. By which I mean, it&apos;s not always clear whether the theorist knows....</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:www.metafilter.com,2005:site.38305-813080</guid>
		<pubDate>Mon, 03 Jan 2005 08:13:11 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>lodurr</dc:creator>
	</item>	<item>
		<title>By: XQUZYPHYR</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/38305/Game-Theory-Resource#813091</link>	
		<description>&lt;i&gt;Is he just not as good in person?&lt;/i&gt;

He&apos;s a very nice guy, but that course was just intolerable.  In the simplest terms, I signed up for a politics course and found myself in a math class.  The Theory of Moves is a great concept, but the book read like pages of the exact same concept being repeated over again.  The course description talked about analyzing historical scenarios, and &quot;game theory&quot; sounded a lot more fun on paper.

I did, however, get an A on my paper that used a 2x2 TOM matrix to explain why it would be better if Bill Bradley was the Democratic nominee for President.  Luckily the paper was due before Iowa.</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:www.metafilter.com,2005:site.38305-813091</guid>
		<pubDate>Mon, 03 Jan 2005 08:25:40 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>XQUZYPHYR</dc:creator>
	</item>	<item>
		<title>By: skoosh</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/38305/Game-Theory-Resource#813104</link>	
		<description>&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.metafilter.com/mefi/38305#813032&quot;&gt;No&lt;/a&gt;, Steven Brams is not a good teacher in person.  He has an incredibly annoyingly nasal Boston accent that only serves to heighten his smug, snooty arrogance.  I took an undergrad course from him once, and that was quite enough, thanks.  I&apos;m also irritated by the fact that he applied for a patent on the theory of moves.  This is a poli sci professor!  Does he think he can get royalties from diplomats and corporate raiders?  His books are fine, since when you read them, you hear your own voice.  At least, if you&apos;ve had the good fortune not to have had to sit through his lectures twice a week for an entire semester.  

&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.metafilter.com/mefi/38305#813080&quot;&gt;lodurr&lt;/a&gt;: one of the rather glaring limitations of game theory is that it models idealized rational behavior, rather than empirically determined real-world human behavior.  Theorists have tried to account for that using notions of limited information and bounded rationality, but I still don&apos;t think at this point that theory conforms very well to observation.</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:www.metafilter.com,2005:site.38305-813104</guid>
		<pubDate>Mon, 03 Jan 2005 08:44:47 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>skoosh</dc:creator>
	</item>	<item>
		<title>By: skoosh</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/38305/Game-Theory-Resource#813121</link>	
		<description>Also, what XQUZYPHYR said.</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:www.metafilter.com,2005:site.38305-813121</guid>
		<pubDate>Mon, 03 Jan 2005 09:00:43 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>skoosh</dc:creator>
	</item>	<item>
		<title>By: u.n. owen</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/38305/Game-Theory-Resource#813185</link>	
		<description>Haha.  Okay.  I like the intersection of politics and math in ways that border on sexual.  So I don&apos;t think I&apos;d mind that, but the voice thing maybe.</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:www.metafilter.com,2005:site.38305-813185</guid>
		<pubDate>Mon, 03 Jan 2005 10:04:28 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>u.n. owen</dc:creator>
	</item>	<item>
		<title>By: Joey Michaels</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/38305/Game-Theory-Resource#813390</link>	
		<description>&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.yesand.com/features/archives/nashtheory.html&quot;&gt;Improv game theory&lt;/a&gt;.</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:www.metafilter.com,2005:site.38305-813390</guid>
		<pubDate>Mon, 03 Jan 2005 13:06:20 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Joey Michaels</dc:creator>
	</item>	<item>
		<title>By: semmi</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/38305/Game-Theory-Resource#813795</link>	
		<description>Interesting, Gyan, as usual.</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:www.metafilter.com,2005:site.38305-813795</guid>
		<pubDate>Mon, 03 Jan 2005 23:05:43 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>semmi</dc:creator>
	</item>	<item>
		<title>By: lodurr</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/38305/Game-Theory-Resource#813853</link>	
		<description>skoosh: What I meant, yes. But what gets interesting is that, if you&apos;re clever, you can game the game theory -- that&apos;s what the best salesmen and con artists do.</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:www.metafilter.com,2005:site.38305-813853</guid>
		<pubDate>Tue, 04 Jan 2005 05:55:28 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>lodurr</dc:creator>
	</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
