October 24, 2000

2:10 PM

IKON's Website Ranked Among Top 200 Business Sites By BtoB, Advertising Age's Marketing NewspaperYour stock's in the toilet, you're being slapped with a class action suit, and you've been put on CreditWatch with negative implications. But your web site shore is purty!
posted by ethmar (7 comments total)

Yeahhh. I'm just not sure about that right now.


I would have to disagree with the part about their website being pretty. Its pretty average if thats what they're saying.
posted by howa2396 at 4:41 PM on October 24, 2000

Their website is nothing special. Rather boring in my opinion.
posted by Zool at 4:46 PM on October 24, 2000

looks like one of those websites that thinks it's good by using a lot of filters
posted by starduck at 6:35 PM on October 24, 2000

Site's OK. Company could use some work. My previous job was in accounts receivable for a phone equip company. We rented copiers from IKON or something; all I know is that they'd always send invoices for the copiers to us instead of to accounts payable. I don't even think they had our phone equipment.

At least I can't blame the laser printer fire on them...that was our equipment :o)
posted by Electric Elf at 7:49 PM on October 24, 2000

site didn't make me puke, but didn't do anything *for* me either.

did anyone else notice their logo is a dead ringer for exxon's? spooky.
posted by patricking at 10:22 PM on October 24, 2000

It's those Windows NT and Internet Explorer banners at the bottom that really make it for me. I mean, you see those and right away you know your dealing with a classy company.

And those image rollovers that take forever and a day to load? Man, it can't get any better than that.

I just really would have liked to see more extensive use of the blink tag and perhaps a few animated fireball graphics.
posted by aladfar at 10:53 PM on October 24, 2000

actually, i looked at it again. i REALLY REALLY like the round CyberTech thing on the left. it, like, totally speaks about being smart in a way that's never been seen.
posted by patricking at 11:34 PM on October 24, 2000