Subscribe
He seems exceptionally unreflective, impatient with the world of ideas, uninterested in some of the nation's key political debates. Characteristically, he does not believe in evolution — he says the jury is still out — but he does not actively disbelieve in it either; as a friend puts it, "he doesn't really care about that kind of thing."
Amid the political furor, Al Gore said through a spokesman that he favored teaching evolution in the public schools, that the decision should be made at the local level, and that "localities should be free to teach creationism as well." But after the Gore campaign was informed that the 1987 Supreme Court decision Edwards v. Aguillard prohibited teaching creationism because it constituted religious belief, Gore retreated to the more sound position that creationism could be taught only in religion classes. In effect, Gore backed off from the cowardly relativism of his initial answer
« Older Bill clinton hangs out with Esquire... | What the Bertelsmann-Napster d... Newer »
This thread has been archived and is closed to new comments
when it went co-ed.
If you've ever been in a men-only or women-only group like a choir or a frat or sports team, you know its a very different social environment, and I don't think it's just sexism to admit that you might enjoy that environment.
Of course that kind of preference isn't sufficient justification for keeping women out of top schools like Yale, and I don't see Bush making an argument that it should, just lamenting the loss of something he enjoyed.
posted by straight at 6:19 AM on November 1, 2000