<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
    xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
     xmlns:admin="http://webns.net/mvcb/"
     xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
     xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#">
	<channel> 

	<title>Comments on: The Bushy Tree</title>
	<link>http://www.metafilter.com/40091/The-Bushy-Tree/</link>
	<description>Comments on MetaFilter post The Bushy Tree</description>
	<pubDate>Wed, 02 Mar 2005 08:39:18 -0800</pubDate>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 02 Mar 2005 08:39:18 -0800</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en-us</language>
	<docs>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/tech/rss</docs>
	<ttl>60</ttl>

	<item>
		<title>The Bushy Tree</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/40091/The-Bushy-Tree</link>	
		<description>&lt;a href="http://www.digibarn.com/stories/desktop-history/bushytree.html"&gt;A clickable genealogy&lt;/a&gt; charting the lineage of visual interactive computing systems and user interfaces, by Bruce Damer. Some quirky/broken links, but plenty of interesting stuff there, too.</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">post:www.metafilter.com,2005:site.40091</guid>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 Mar 2005 08:28:40 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>carter</dc:creator>		<category>computers</category>		<category>history</category>		<category>interface</category>		<category>technology</category>
	</item>	<item>
		<title>By: exhilaration</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/40091/The-Bushy-Tree#868332</link>	
		<description>Hmmm... I bet Gnome fans are going to be annoyed by his inclusion of KDE and omission of Gnome.</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:www.metafilter.com,2005:site.40091-868332</guid>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 Mar 2005 08:39:18 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>exhilaration</dc:creator>
	</item>	<item>
		<title>By: heresiarch</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/40091/The-Bushy-Tree#868401</link>	
		<description>I&apos;m too young to appreciate most of those technologies, but I ran across some &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.gnustep.org/experience/DevelopmentDemonstration.html&quot;&gt;videos of application development on GNUstep&lt;/a&gt; a while back. It&apos;s not identical to NextStep, but as far as I understand, it&apos;s close.

Textual descriptions of NextStep never really made me appreciate how much OS X owes to it. Apple&apos;s Interface Builder and all of their software development metaphors are verbatim lifted from NextStep. The connections are so deep that all the API calls in OS X are prefixed by NS. That link is probably stronger even than the System 7 -&amp;gt; OS X link.</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:www.metafilter.com,2005:site.40091-868401</guid>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 Mar 2005 10:13:08 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>heresiarch</dc:creator>
	</item>	<item>
		<title>By: xammerboy</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/40091/The-Bushy-Tree#868421</link>	
		<description>I once read that the design guidelines for NextStep are published and publicly available.  Anyone know where those could be found.  I tried looking without any luck.</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:www.metafilter.com,2005:site.40091-868421</guid>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 Mar 2005 10:33:07 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>xammerboy</dc:creator>
	</item>	<item>
		<title>By: davejay</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/40091/The-Bushy-Tree#868573</link>	
		<description>Hmm. More than half of the computer systems, and huge piles of applications (they include photoshop, after all) aren&apos;t on here. I suspect it&apos;s a mite incomplete, or perhaps a tad unfocused.</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:www.metafilter.com,2005:site.40091-868573</guid>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 Mar 2005 13:50:24 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>davejay</dc:creator>
	</item>	<item>
		<title>By: KS</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/40091/The-Bushy-Tree#868607</link>	
		<description>Is that a complaint? It&apos;s not like there are a ton of other sites, or books, with comprehensive histories of computing interfaces that puts this to shame. This is an interesting project with interesting links. I look forward to seeing it evolve over time.

As well, the inclusion of Photoshop and its ancestry does not suggest to me that there is a lack of focus; it acknowledges that some important developments happen while focusing on the specific, rather than the general. How many other applications  have become a verb?

I appreciate being pointed to this.</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:www.metafilter.com,2005:site.40091-868607</guid>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 Mar 2005 14:37:40 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>KS</dc:creator>
	</item>	<item>
		<title>By: doctor_negative</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/40091/The-Bushy-Tree#868631</link>	
		<description>Seems to leave BSD out of the OSX equation. I would also say that Photoshop owes as much to MacPaint as anything.</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:www.metafilter.com,2005:site.40091-868631</guid>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 Mar 2005 15:12:14 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>doctor_negative</dc:creator>
	</item>	<item>
		<title>By: Chunder</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/40091/The-Bushy-Tree#868909</link>	
		<description>Uhh... so it has Atari ST, but no Amiga... and it has Deluxe Paint - one of the early applications that *sold* Amigas... pfeh.</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:www.metafilter.com,2005:site.40091-868909</guid>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 Mar 2005 01:38:10 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chunder</dc:creator>
	</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
