Superatoms: Disagreement Within the Clustering Field
March 29, 2005 7:49 AM   Subscribe

 
Whoa.
posted by ZenMasterThis at 9:41 AM on March 29, 2005


Talk about your holy grails, they claim to have developed an aluminum that won't corrode from oxygen. If comercializable some one is going to be making some serious bank.
posted by Mitheral at 10:54 AM on March 29, 2005


I, for one, welcome our new superatomic overlords.
posted by leapfrog at 11:08 AM on March 29, 2005


This comment is to encourage more posts like this on Metafilter. Thanks dfowler.
posted by Hildago at 12:56 PM on March 29, 2005


Someday, the common man will walk on the Moon. Also, the Moon will by that time be blasted full of random holes.
posted by m39 at 1:34 PM on March 29, 2005


Atomtastical.
posted by TwelveTwo at 2:28 PM on March 29, 2005


So which variety is transparent?

Hellooo, computer! </Doohan>
posted by NortonDC at 6:44 PM on March 29, 2005


Bah! I was going to say that.
posted by coelecanth at 6:55 PM on March 29, 2005


So, coelecanth, would you say that I foiled you again?
posted by NortonDC at 7:22 PM on March 29, 2005


Firstly, this is not McGraw-like: it is thematic and coherent.
Secondly, this is a brilliant post.
posted by blendor at 9:12 PM on March 29, 2005


[Dirty Harry voice] being this is one of the most common elements in the world and would blow your oxygen clean off - you've got to ask yourself a question....do I feel stable? Well do ya punk?

I enjoy how scientists bicker about the relevence because it's not an original idea...even though, y'know, he did the experiment.
New nanomaterials? Woo hoo!!!!
Look at what dynamite alone did.
posted by Smedleyman at 11:22 PM on March 29, 2005


« Older Southeast Asian refugees   |   We are all children in the arms of Chivas. Newer »


This thread has been archived and is closed to new comments