<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
    xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
     xmlns:admin="http://webns.net/mvcb/"
     xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
     xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#">
	<channel> 

	<title>Comments on: MSM + Blogs = Bad</title>
	<link>http://www.metafilter.com/40808/MSM-Blogs-Bad/</link>
	<description>Comments on MetaFilter post MSM + Blogs = Bad</description>
	<pubDate>Tue, 29 Mar 2005 16:28:57 -0800</pubDate>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 29 Mar 2005 16:28:57 -0800</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en-us</language>
	<docs>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/tech/rss</docs>
	<ttl>60</ttl>

	<item>
		<title>MSM + Blogs = Bad</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/40808/MSM-Blogs-Bad</link>	
		<description>&lt;a href=&quot;http://online.startribune.com/nuke/twins/modules.php?name=News&amp;file=article&amp;sid=173&amp;SID=d57l8ochouvf7gc1hivs84pec3&quot; title=&quot;Oil doesn&apos;t seem to mix well with water.&quot;&gt;The experiment has ended.&lt;/a&gt; Roughly &lt;a href=&quot;http://online.startribune.com/nuke/twins/modules.php?name=News&amp;file=article&amp;sid=2&quot; title=&quot;This day in history: the Twins as dynasty.&quot;&gt;8 months ago&lt;/a&gt;, the &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.startribune.com/&quot; title=&quot;Oh Minnesota.&quot;&gt;Star Tribune&lt;/a&gt; joined forces with blogger &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.twinsgeek.com&quot; title=&quot;He&apos;s a Twins fan. He&apos;s a geek. It&apos;s kinda sad, really.&quot;&gt;Twins Geek&lt;/a&gt;. The hope: a productive union of traditional journalism and online weblogs. The verdict: an unholy marriage, apparently. And this was just a baseball blog.</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">post:www.metafilter.com,2005:site.40808</guid>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 Mar 2005 16:03:54 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>panoptican</dc:creator>		<category>blogs</category>		<category>sports</category>		<category>msm</category>		<category>media</category>		<category>journalism</category>
	</item>	<item>
		<title>By: jsavimbi</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/40808/MSM-Blogs-Bad#891051</link>	
		<description>sounds like there&apos;s a lot of &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.bostondirtdogs.com/&quot;&gt;that&lt;/a&gt; going around</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:www.metafilter.com,2005:site.40808-891051</guid>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 Mar 2005 16:28:57 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>jsavimbi</dc:creator>
	</item>	<item>
		<title>By: graventy</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/40808/MSM-Blogs-Bad#891105</link>	
		<description>Uh...I&apos;m confused.  
&lt;em&gt;
This experiment ends this week, I think, since our contract was only valid through the end of October.&lt;/em&gt;

The story date is today, but is this old news?</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:www.metafilter.com,2005:site.40808-891105</guid>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 Mar 2005 17:13:49 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>graventy</dc:creator>
	</item>	<item>
		<title>By: dhartung</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/40808/MSM-Blogs-Bad#891275</link>	
		<description>The date of the &quot;final posting&quot; was November 22. I think that the phpNuke software is configured such that today&apos;s date appears at the top of the posting section. (The &lt;a href=&quot;http://online.startribune.com/nuke/twins/modules.php?name=News&amp;file=article&amp;sid=173&quot;&gt;comments&lt;/a&gt; were posted beginning 11/22/04, as well.)

Because the baseball season was over, he didn&apos;t resume posting (on his own site), as far as I can tell, until March 6, 2005.</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:www.metafilter.com,2005:site.40808-891275</guid>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 Mar 2005 19:46:41 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>dhartung</dc:creator>
	</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
