<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
    xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
     xmlns:admin="http://webns.net/mvcb/"
     xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
     xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#">
	<channel> 

	<title>Comments on: Comments on 4112</title>
	<link>http://www.metafilter.com/4112//</link>
	<description>Comments on MetaFilter post Comments on 4112</description>
	<pubDate>Wed, 08 Nov 2000 07:10:02 -0800</pubDate>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 08 Nov 2000 07:10:02 -0800</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en-us</language>
	<docs>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/tech/rss</docs>
	<ttl>60</ttl>

	<item>
		<title>Post number 4112</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/4112/</link>	
		<description>&lt;a href="http://www.newsday.com/ap/topnews/ap705.htm"&gt;Writer Guilty of Voter Fraud&lt;/a&gt; From his stunt during the primaries, Salon writer Dan Savage has plead guilty to a misdemeanor charge of voter fraud to avoid trial on a felony charge.</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">post:www.metafilter.com,2000:site.4112</guid>
		<pubDate>Wed, 08 Nov 2000 07:00:36 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Dreama</dc:creator>		<category>dansavage</category>		<category>voterfraud</category>		<category>elections</category>
	</item>	<item>
		<title>By: alan</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/4112/#28232</link>	
		<description>How can they deny the caucuses have a security problem when the only reason they knew about Dan Savage and his fraudulent vote was a column that got national attention.  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:www.metafilter.com,2000:site.4112-28232</guid>
		<pubDate>Wed, 08 Nov 2000 07:10:02 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>alan</dc:creator>
	</item>	<item>
		<title>By: beth</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/4112/#28303</link>	
		<description>I get &quot;page not found&quot;. Anybody have a working link for this one?</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:www.metafilter.com,2000:site.4112-28303</guid>
		<pubDate>Wed, 08 Nov 2000 10:14:58 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>beth</dc:creator>
	</item>	<item>
		<title>By: Outlawyr</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/4112/#28393</link>	
		<description>try &lt;a href=&quot;http://dailynews.yahoo.com/h/ap/20001108/el/eln_campaign_infiltration_1.html&quot;&gt;http://dailynews.yahoo.com/h/ap/20001108/el/eln_campaign_infiltration_1.html&lt;/a&gt;</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:www.metafilter.com,2000:site.4112-28393</guid>
		<pubDate>Wed, 08 Nov 2000 12:42:43 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Outlawyr</dc:creator>
	</item>	<item>
		<title>By: UrineSoakedRube</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/4112/#28428</link>	
		<description>I am really at a loss as to why this should be
considered a crime at all.  The Iowa straw
poll isn&apos;t binding to either party -- it&apos;s a
popularity contest.  No delegates are 
elected, and it is not a secret ballot.  This
talk about security problems avoids the fact
that there shouldn&apos;t be a straw poll in the
first place.</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:www.metafilter.com,2000:site.4112-28428</guid>
		<pubDate>Wed, 08 Nov 2000 13:47:54 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>UrineSoakedRube</dc:creator>
	</item>	<item>
		<title>By: alan</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/4112/#28438</link>	
		<description>Except this wasn&apos;t a straw poll, it was the actual Republican caucus.</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:www.metafilter.com,2000:site.4112-28438</guid>
		<pubDate>Wed, 08 Nov 2000 14:03:31 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>alan</dc:creator>
	</item>	<item>
		<title>By: thirteen</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/4112/#28442</link>	
		<description>UrineSoakedRube you have the most vile Metafilter name I have ever seen. Go stand in the corner.</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:www.metafilter.com,2000:site.4112-28442</guid>
		<pubDate>Wed, 08 Nov 2000 14:05:01 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>thirteen</dc:creator>
	</item>	<item>
		<title>By: UrineSoakedRube</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/4112/#28509</link>	
		<description>All right, I went to salon.com and checked the original
story, &quot;Stalking Gary Bauer,&quot; and it used the term
caucus instead of straw poll.  But my point remains
that the results of the Iowa causus/straw poll/whatever
were not binding in any real sense.  No delegates to
the Republican convention were chosen as a result
of the outcome.

So why is Dan Savage&apos;s caucus voter fraud punishable
at all?  If, say, I lied to an exit pollster on my way out
of the polling place, could I be arrested?  What if I
only pretended  that I had voted and then told an
exit pollster that I voted for Gore?  Could I be arrested
then?

I&apos;m not sure why Iowa is able to bring criminal charges
against Savage.  I may be able to see the Iowa
Republican party bringing a civil suit against him, but
I imagine that they wouldn&apos;t bother.

thirteen -- Really?  The most vile Metafilter name that
                 you&apos;ve seen?  Thanks! </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:www.metafilter.com,2000:site.4112-28509</guid>
		<pubDate>Wed, 08 Nov 2000 19:21:09 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>UrineSoakedRube</dc:creator>
	</item>	<item>
		<title>By: Mars Saxman</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/4112/#28542</link>	
		<description>Was it ever even proved that he did what he claimed to have done in his column? How do we know he didn&apos;t just make the whole story up?

The page at the link listed above no longer seems to work, so I can&apos;t check to see if the article explains this.

-Mars</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:www.metafilter.com,2000:site.4112-28542</guid>
		<pubDate>Wed, 08 Nov 2000 21:34:20 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Mars Saxman</dc:creator>
	</item>	<item>
		<title>By: capt.crackpipe</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/4112/#28552</link>	
		<description>&lt;i&gt;Dan Savage, 36, had been charged with two counts of voter fraud for casting a ballot using a Des Moines hotel address. He pleaded guilty Tuesday to fraudulently voting in a caucus, a misdemeanor.

By pleading guilty, Savage was spared a trial on a felony voter fraud count. He could have faced up to six years in prison. He was sentenced instead to a year&apos;s probation, 50 hours&apos; community service and a $750 fine.&lt;/i&gt;

No burden of proof if guilt is admitted. Is bad advice a just a misdemeanor?</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:www.metafilter.com,2000:site.4112-28552</guid>
		<pubDate>Wed, 08 Nov 2000 22:23:22 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>capt.crackpipe</dc:creator>
	</item>	<item>
		<title>By: kindall</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/4112/#28563</link>	
		<description>The man essentially got slapped on the wrist compared to what he could have got. Binding or not, it&apos;s still a vote and you &lt;B&gt;don&apos;t&lt;/B&gt; tamper with that.

I like Savage generally, but geez, this was one of the dumbest stunts I&apos;ve ever seen anyone brag about in print.</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:www.metafilter.com,2000:site.4112-28563</guid>
		<pubDate>Thu, 09 Nov 2000 00:30:09 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>kindall</dc:creator>
	</item>	<item>
		<title>By: dhartung</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/4112/#28615</link>	
		<description>It was a crazy, hack-the-system stunt. Bravo. And how, how stupid....</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:www.metafilter.com,2000:site.4112-28615</guid>
		<pubDate>Thu, 09 Nov 2000 08:14:31 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>dhartung</dc:creator>
	</item>	<item>
		<title>By: UrineSoakedRube</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/4112/#28761</link>	
		<description>D&apos;Oh!  A Retraction

Oops.  After some research, I realized that I
completely misunderstood what had happened.
The straw poll is not the caucus.  Savage voted
in the caucus.

Still, I am a bit confused as to some details of
the story:  Savage told the woman who gave him
the ballot that you have to be a registered Iowa
Republican, but other sources note that anyone 
who is a registered voter may participate in a 
caucus.  

Anyway, I take it back:  I do see how this can be
considered illegal.  Mea maxima culpa</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:www.metafilter.com,2000:site.4112-28761</guid>
		<pubDate>Thu, 09 Nov 2000 15:21:10 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>UrineSoakedRube</dc:creator>
	</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
