"In all fairness, I want to hear from Senator Frist directly on this issue of leadership. I left a message with his press office yesterday asking for one of his staff to call me or e-mail me for an interview, in order to allow them to respond to my criticisms on this blog."
Best of luck, Cap'n! posted by trharlan at 7:30 PM on April 21, 2005
Well, they won't go Democrat--ever. And it feeds their persecution complexes. They've already made enormous gains, and if they're not satisfied, the rest of the country's unhappiness at their success so far should make them happy.
Let them run a 3rd-party person for Pres who will do exactly what they want in 08--Judge Roy Moore or Newt maybe? ; > posted by amberglow at 7:38 PM on April 21, 2005
And it feeds their persecution complexes.
Oh the irony. posted by justgary at 7:51 PM on April 21, 2005
yeah, justgary, i forgot about that whole Constitutional Amendment thing against Rightwingers. How silly of me. Idiot. Who's in control of 2 out of 3 branches of government, and counting? posted by amberglow at 7:59 PM on April 21, 2005
Delay-Dobson '08. We might even be able to get Kerry elected with that ticket in the mix. posted by ontic at 8:02 PM on April 21, 2005
Who's in control of 2 out of 3 branches of government, and counting?
You must be one of them thar activist mefites. posted by AlexReynolds at 8:03 PM on April 21, 2005
unelected to boot. posted by quonsar at 8:16 PM on April 21, 2005
I dunno. Hasn't our ancient, well-respected "evil will defeat itself" meme taken a beating as of late?
To flesh that out, I'm positive that -- with the great number of non-voters out there -- each party believed that, if only they could get these people to vote, they'd "do the right thing". (I know the Dems believed that, anyway) Does anyone believe that anymore? If we could get young people to come out in droves, do we really think that it would reveal that there's a secret undercurrent of dems in America that proves it actually is a country that wants all the things we hope it wants? (or moderates? or believers in logic and science?) posted by dreamsign at 9:33 PM on April 21, 2005
(is this the part where we start waiting for the new george wallace to come along and fracture the conservative base and singlehandedly reverse the party affiliations, allowing the new liberal republicans to sweep the political landscape clean?) posted by kaibutsu at 11:50 PM on April 21, 2005
The best thing that Dems can do now is (clandestinely) encourage a conservative third party. Let's see what Perot is up to! posted by klangklangston at 11:55 PM on April 21, 2005
Let them run a 3rd-party person for Pres who will do exactly what they want in 08--Judge Roy Moore or Newt maybe? ; >
Judge Roy Moore!? No sir. my vote is for Judge Roy Bean. posted by nola at 5:59 AM on April 22, 2005
Well, they won't go Democrat - amberglow
But will they stay home?
The best thing that Dems can do now is (clandestinely) encourage a conservative third party. Let's see what Perot is up to! - klangklangston
First, you should probably go figure out what 'conservative' means. posted by rush at 11:19 AM on April 22, 2005
I don't think they will, rush. That's the problem. The really religious ones will stay home if they're disappointed or angered enough, but the others won't.
I would never sit out a presidential election, so i usually assume others who are interested won't either (no matter which side). posted by amberglow at 11:23 AM on April 22, 2005
« Older Jesus Christ Supercop.... | Prime Minister Paul Martin add... Newer »
This thread has been archived and is closed to new comments
posted by UseyurBrain at 7:03 PM on April 21, 2005