Comments on: Time Warp to 1983!

Time Warp to 1983!

Snyder — Thu, 19 May 2005 13:21:46 -0800

Commentary, insights, and first impressions of the new Star Wars film, "Return of the Jedi."

By: billysumday

billysumday — Thu, 19 May 2005 13:27:36 -0800

Nice find. From the "Possible physics bug in RotJ" thread: I had the impression (from the Alliance Simulation) that it was in geosynchronus orbit about that moon. Of course one might question whether such a small body would be able to hold an atmosphere long enough to evolve Ewoks. Yes, one might. One certainly might.

By: The Card Cheat

The Card Cheat — Thu, 19 May 2005 13:29:48 -0800

"Also, Ewoks remind me of Munchkins in Wizard of Oz. They are too cute and sweet and give me a cavity." Heh. The passage of time has only confirmed the wisdom of this judgement. I remember giving away all of my ROTJ trading cards with Ewoks on them to a girl I liked in grade four. She was quite pleased with them, so at least some good came of the little turdwads.

By: Pollomacho

Pollomacho — Thu, 19 May 2005 13:36:38 -0800

Now, I'm no scientitian, but I always wondered, how come the death star parts didn't rain death down onto the forest moon like so much brimstone?

By: Kellydamnit

Kellydamnit — Thu, 19 May 2005 13:38:05 -0800

I always liked the Ewoks, and was embarrassed to admit it as a kid to my mostly-guy friends. I am such a girl. (also, I love this. More than twenty years later and it sounds pretty much like people talking about them today)

By: The Card Cheat

The Card Cheat — Thu, 19 May 2005 13:44:49 -0800

Pollo, check this out for a scientifical discussion of related issues (i.e. what the actual result of all the alien ships crashing to Earth in Independence Day would have been).

By: The Card Cheat

The Card Cheat — Thu, 19 May 2005 13:46:15 -0800

Aw hell, here's the passage I'm talking about; Downing a fifteen-mile-diameter saucer would be a disaster. Krauss estimates it would weigh about 100 billion tons and that dropping it from a height of about a mile would release more than 10,000 times as much energy as the nuclear bomb used on Hiroshima. However, that would be minor compared to the effects of releasing the antimatter fuel aboard the ship. The saucer would still be loaded with enough antimatter fuel to toast several cities as well as return to the mothership. The return trip would lift the saucer thousands of times higher than the one mile fall described. Hence, there would be thousands of times more energy stored in the antimatter fuel than released by a one-mile saucer fall. Breaching the antimatter's containment field would cause one gigantic explosion. Do this to saucers all over the globe and Goldblum would have to recycle an awful lot of aluminum cans to compensate.

By: gurple

gurple — Thu, 19 May 2005 13:48:44 -0800

Me slow today, me not understand. Google Groups not exist in 1983. Someone help me out -- what sort of message board, that was around in '83, did this stuff come from? Someone's private BBS? I'm willing to accept the declared age of the posts as legit, though, because not one person seems to have referred to Luke as a 1337 4CE H4XX0r.

By: Kellydamnit

Kellydamnit — Thu, 19 May 2005 14:07:07 -0800

it's usenet, gurple

By: expialidocious

expialidocious — Thu, 19 May 2005 14:08:01 -0800

I always thought the Ewoks were cheesified ripoffs of H. Beam Piper's book Little Fuzzy - which was not the uncheesiest science fiction novel itself. See the cover image...

By: fvw

fvw — Thu, 19 May 2005 14:13:55 -0800

Google bought their archive from DejaNews by the way (and I've still not really seen any improvement on what DejaNews, which is a shame really considering what google has managed to do with other corpora of data).

By: gurple

gurple — Thu, 19 May 2005 14:15:16 -0800

Man, I'm such a newbie. I thought people were still sending smoke signals and flashing mirrors and whatnot until 1989, which is when I encountered my first BBS. expialidocious, Piper's Fuzzy books were pretty kickass, when I was but a wee lad not concerned with keeping a low level of cheese in my reading diet. I'd forgotten about them -- thanks for reminding me of them!

By: me & my monkey

me & my monkey — Thu, 19 May 2005 14:17:10 -0800

Now, I'm no scientitian, but I always wondered, how come the death star parts didn't rain death down onto the forest moon like so much brimstone? Someone's way ahead of you ...

By: notmydesk

notmydesk — Thu, 19 May 2005 14:18:24 -0800

What the heck is Star Wars and why should I care what people think about it? And who is Ryan Seacrest?

By: Specklet

Specklet — Thu, 19 May 2005 14:20:10 -0800

expialidocious, you may be on to something...

By: elpapacito

elpapacito — Thu, 19 May 2005 14:20:14 -0800

There was I time I would have entered a Star Wars cue : I'm so glad it's over. maturity has it benefits. Long live and Prosper \/

By: PhatLobley

PhatLobley — Thu, 19 May 2005 14:20:44 -0800

This stuff was really interesting. I would love to see something like this for Empire. I was just telling my buddy today how I really wish I could remember finding out for the first time that DV is Luke's father.

By: Specklet

Specklet — Thu, 19 May 2005 14:25:09 -0800

All ewoks would have been better off if the tribe which made contact with the rebels continued with their original plan of killing and eating the commando team's leaders.

By: loquacious

loquacious — Thu, 19 May 2005 14:28:05 -0800

The sheer ultranerdiness of discussing Star Wars (and the accuracy of the physics of Star Wars) on Usenet way back in 1983 just makes my head spin 'round like a motorized propeller beanie. I didn't even hear about Usenet until 1989 or 1990 or so (about the same time I heard about the internet), and even by then it was pretty well trashed. It's weird to think that during this same time period (80-94 or so) hundreds of thousands of folks were dialing out to BBSs and running BBSs and participating in ad-hoc mail networks like FidoNet, all because simply connecting to this fabulous, existing network cost too damn much. I remember when one of my roommates finally sprang for a private internet account about 91-92 or so. It was like 500-700 bucks a month or something totally stupid like that. And it might have just been an email address and an ultra-basic shell login. No SLIP, no PPP, no interweb, nothing. Email and maybe telnet. Of course, he later recouped some of that insane fee by offering a gateway to the net through his multiline BBS.

By: brain_drain

brain_drain — Thu, 19 May 2005 14:52:10 -0800

After seeing "Return of the Jedi" Wednesday . . . . I'm pretty sure that Episodes I, II, and [III] will be about Anakin (Darth Vader) Skywalker and how he was drawn to the Dark Side of the force (what is the offer he couldn't refuse?). Most impressive, nerd-in-1983.

By: Heywood Mogroot

Heywood Mogroot — Thu, 19 May 2005 14:56:26 -0800

Google did extend the usenet archives from 1995 (dejanews' horizon) to 1980 or whatever.

By: ScotchLynx

ScotchLynx — Thu, 19 May 2005 14:58:25 -0800

I don't know where I read it, but I heard that the Ewoks were supposed to be Wookies, but for some reason they changed 'em. Also, they just switched the syllables in the names.

By: InfidelZombie

InfidelZombie — Thu, 19 May 2005 15:03:21 -0800

Ewoks are more teddy-bear like than actual bear-like, and are thus more marketable as toys.

By: Zonker

Zonker — Thu, 19 May 2005 16:14:20 -0800

Wow, the old-school geek-cred of addresses like ...!duke!mcnc!msdc!gatech!spaf is just overpowering. (Though it really should have a something-vax or two in there somewhere for maximum points.)

By: Zonker

Zonker — Thu, 19 May 2005 16:15:49 -0800

Oops, meant to link that to this post.

By: metaculpa

metaculpa — Thu, 19 May 2005 16:40:46 -0800

Man, I really want to write a paper with a section titled Orbital considerations. Biology sux.

By: metaculpa

metaculpa — Thu, 19 May 2005 16:41:26 -0800

I did not just do that. The word is sucks, I swear.

By: expialidocious

expialidocious — Thu, 19 May 2005 16:42:13 -0800

Specklet and gurple... I was geeky enough in 1983 to have not only read Piper but also cared that Lucas may have ripped him off, but not quite enough to be on Usenet (I was on geek hiatus between the Apple II and Netscape). Otherwise, that poster could have been me.

By: Sparx

Sparx — Thu, 19 May 2005 18:12:53 -0800

I have always thought that Piper's Fuzzy should be made into a movie. It's like - a cutesiepie effects flick that midway through turn into a courtroom drama - what's not to love? That could, of course, be the reason why Hollywood has yet to hand me millions of dollars in indescretianary income.

By: mecran01

mecran01 — Thu, 19 May 2005 19:53:05 -0800

I heard the Wookie costumes were too expensive.

By: papakwanz

papakwanz — Thu, 19 May 2005 19:56:34 -0800

PhatLobley: I would love to see something like this for Empire. I was just telling my buddy today how I really wish I could remember finding out for the first time that DV is Luke's father. Perhaps it was something like this: Coming out of the movie... Homer: Wow, what an ending! Who would have thought Darth Vader was Luke Skywalker's father! Crowd: [waiting in line to see the movie] Oh, thank you, Mister Blow-the-picture-for-me.

By: PurplePorpoise

PurplePorpoise — Thu, 19 May 2005 20:37:23 -0800

metaculpa - molecular orbital considerations (of enzyme/protein X interaction w/ Y)?

By: dhartung

dhartung — Thu, 19 May 2005 21:36:14 -0800

Wow, the old-school geek-cred of addresses like... Zonker: Do you know who you linked to? papakwanz: I was standing in line near the front for the second showing, and some asshole walking out of the first yelled "Darth Vader is Luke's father!" to the whole line. Fortunately, the fourth-reel twist is not as important to the film as the character development in the screenplay thanks to Leigh Brackett, and the film stands repeated viewing well. And obviously, the structure of the series means that we have three movies where people know how it all turns out, and they still made billions. Google did extend the usenet archives from 1995 (dejanews' horizon) to 1980 or whatever. Only with the devoted assistance of Henry Spencer.

By: NinjaPirate

NinjaPirate — Fri, 20 May 2005 01:40:42 -0800

Fabulous find. Nerds: not working when they should have been since 1983

By: idontlikewords

idontlikewords — Fri, 20 May 2005 07:16:09 -0800

It's nice to see that the SPOILER! warning has been around for so long. Although in the context of "Darth Vader's Body (Spoiler)" it did give me a chuckle. =)

By: Smedleyman

Smedleyman — Fri, 20 May 2005 14:14:08 -0800

...youse guys haven't heard of the usenet? There were tons of discussions on who would win in the Empire VS the Federation. Tons. Sheesh. Geekkids today.

By: originalname37

originalname37 — Mon, 23 May 2005 09:14:31 -0800

PhatLobley : I really wish I could remember finding out for the first time that DV is Luke's father. As I recall, it wasn't entirely clear that this was the case. To many it seemed a ploy on the part of DV until confirmed by OWK in ROTJ.

By: ZachsMind

ZachsMind — Mon, 23 May 2005 10:56:21 -0800

mecran01: "I heard the Wookie costumes were too expensive." That was just part of it. Standing at seven foot three, Peter Mayhew is a rarity among interested actors. There was an attempt to use wookies in a television holiday special back in 1978 and the result was generally not appreciated. If you put even someone six foot tall in a wookie outfit, they look stupid. Back in 1983, it was more feasible to make costumes half the size of Chewie's, put Little People in them, and reverse the syllables (wook-ee to ee-wok). I'm not saying more believable. I'm saying more feasible, based on the resources available to Lucas at the time. I haven't seen the new movie yet. I'm assuming there's wookies in it this time around, because with advances in digital art and other resources now at Lucas' disposal, he wouldn't be able to resist the temptation. However, I bet their appearance is relatively brief. Regarding remembering finding out for the first time that DV was Luke's dad, I recall not taking the news well. I think I yelled "no!" at the screen obnoxiously loud, pissing off some guy behind me. Up until that moment I was totally with the franchise, but that was the beginning of the end of my obsession. I felt it a trite plot device at the time, and was equally disappointed when Ben affirmed it in ROTJ. The whole point of these prequels is really to explain HOW Darth was Luke's father. I honestly don't think Lucas planned that initially when he made the first movie.

By: Kellydamnit

Kellydamnit — Mon, 23 May 2005 11:51:22 -0800

There was an attempt to use wookies in a television holiday special back in 1978 and the result was generally not appreciated. yes, but not because of the poor costumes. Honestly, when I saw it the costumes were the last thing on my mind. More because of the half hour sequences with nothing but wookie grunts, plotlines only a schizophrenic could follow, and celebrity guest stars seemingly chosen from a hat. Honestly, they could have been wearing paper bags for all the sense it made. The wookies in the new one, while not given the camera time they were in the original, do get a fair spot. And Mayhew's in it.

By: originalname37

originalname37 — Mon, 23 May 2005 12:22:57 -0800

Apparently, the whole gang is in this holiday special and, based on what I've seen here, I absolutely have to see it.