May 26, 2005 12:06 PM Subscribe
Despite efforts to stop phishing
, they have continued to become more pervasive. While some tools
are helping combat the problem, they have done little to curb these activities. Cellphones, Yahoo IM and AIM were all recently hit by new types of attacks. The AIM attack was more sophisticated than previous versions and combined phishing with a worm that installed software that allows the attacker to potentially take over the comprimised machine. To complicate problems further, a vast majority of these scams take place in locations that make it difficult if not impossible to prosecute the operators.
Because of this, I was delighted to read about hackers that are defacing phishing sites
. While this is not legal either, it was some what satisfying to find out these asshats were getting a taste of there own medicine. Do any of you think a penny should be wasted persuing these hackers? If not, what are the legal implications in allowing hackers to attack some sites and not others?
posted by Mr_Zero (17 comments total)
« Older Thomas Jones and Tammie Bristol, both Wiccans, div... | WCBS reporter Arthur Chi'en fi... Newer »