Models involving games and moves are often used to describe interactions. Despite whatever conflicts or systematic social differences might be in play, it is assumed that all participants are engaged in the same game and that the game is the same for all players. Often it is. But of course it often is not, as, for example, when speakers are from different classes or cultures, or one party is exercising authority and another is submitting to it or questioning it. Last year one of my children moved to a new elementary school that had more open classrooms and more flexible curricula than the conventional school he started out in. A few days into the term, we asked him what it was like at the new school. "Well," he said, "theyre a lot nicer, and they have a lot less rules. But know why theyre nicer?" "Why?" I asked. "So youll obey all the rules they dont have," he replied. This is a very coherent analysis with considerable elegance and explanatory power, but probably not the one his teacher would have given.I did some googling around and found an essay, "Estevanico’s Legacy: Insights into Colonial Latin American Studies from Postcolonial Africa" by Rolena Adorno, one of the main experts on Guaman Poma's text; she's working on an English translation, of which you can see a sample here.
« Older Microsoft Start (version 3)... | Bush comes out in favor of tea... Newer »
This thread has been archived and is closed to new comments
posted by Moral Animal at 10:09 AM on August 2, 2005