SubscribeIn broad terms, we saw the project as building upon the Defense strategy outlined by the Cheney Defense Department in the waning days of the Bush [Sr.] Administration.
The Defense Policy Guidance (DPG) drafted in the early months of 1992 provided a blueprint for maintaining U.S.
preeminence, precluding the rise of a great power rival, and shaping the international security order in line with American principles and interests.
(...)
This report proceeds from the belief that America should seek to preserve and extend its position of global leadership by maintaining the preeminence of U.S. military forces.... At no time in history has the international security order been as conducive to American interests and ideals.
The challenge for the coming century is to preserve and enhance this “American peace.”
(...)
After 2010 – seemingly a long way off but well within traditional defense planning horizons – the outlook for increased military spending under current plans becomes even more doubtful. In the coming decades, the network of social entitlement programs, particularly Social Security, will generate a further squeeze on other federal spending programs. If defense budgets remain at projected levels, America’s global military preeminence will be impossible to maintain, as will the world order that is secured by that preeminence.
Further, the process of transformation, even if it brings revolutionary change, is likely to be a long one, absent some catastrophic and catalyzing event – like a new Pearl Harbor.
« Older The Gospel of Slavery: A Primer of Freedom.... | St. James Infirmary,... Newer »
This thread has been archived and is closed to new comments
takeafuckingjokepuhleeze
No. Dickhead.
posted by dersins at 10:18 PM on August 30, 2005