FYI: I don't really feel "one way or the other" about Native hunting rights.
I realize it is an integral part of their history and culture and that the conservation issues have been addressed by all involved many times over.
More so, I found the need to "censor" ubiquitous modern technology in order to prevent a potential PR nightmare an interesting quandary.
Cheers,
num- posted by numlok at 5:24 PM on September 8, 2005
Another note...
The cameras have been knocked out of service today due to weather, so I guess my "handy" link is really moot.
Although you never know, I doubt they're in any real hurry to repair it as it was set to be disabled tomorrow anyhow.
Check back Oct. 21st for the return of the video (but with a few less seals). posted by numlok at 5:35 PM on September 8, 2005
Hmm, I wonder if before the camera got borked if the site stated why the cameras were going offline.
If they were upfront about the First Nations (I guess there's a different term used in the US) wanting privacy, then I don't have a problem with taking the cams down.
As for the hunting, I'm all for it. AFAIK it's not ecologically extreme.
Would anyone have a problem with having web cams monitor feed cattle - and if there were such cams, what would your opinion be on turning them off/keeping them online during the slaughter stage of the feed cattle's lives? posted by PurplePorpoise at 8:44 PM on September 8, 2005
« Older
On live TV, irate Miss. man tells Cheney to "self-...
| Rappers I Know...
Newer »
This thread has been archived and is closed to new comments
I realize it is an integral part of their history and culture and that the conservation issues have been addressed by all involved many times over.
More so, I found the need to "censor" ubiquitous modern technology in order to prevent a potential PR nightmare an interesting quandary.
Cheers,
num-
posted by numlok at 5:24 PM on September 8, 2005