Comments on: A Load of Bollocks: Film Director Uwe Boll sets the web ablaze

A Load of Bollocks: Film Director Uwe Boll sets the web ablaze

nthdegx — Sat, 01 Oct 2005 03:08:40 -0800

"If you must see this movie, do yourself a favor and wait until it's in the bargain bin at the video store. If there's any justice in the film industry, one of the main actors will be there to rent it to you." A quote from a review of Alone in the Dark. Dr. Uwe Boll is developing quite a reputation as a terrible film director; and ruiner of valuable intellectual property with his videogame adaptations. Something Awful's look behind the scenes of Alone in the Dark makes for grim reading: "I know English is not his first language, but Jesus Christ, I'm not even sure this man has a first language", but for many the trailer was enough to put people off. According to Wikipedia, "he is currently in a bidding war for rights to Half-Life and Metal Gear Solid, and ... may be after the rights to Fallout and Castlevania as well". Before legions of gamers collapse under the strain, you should know it isn't all bad news. He isn't without fans; and Boll is apparently an active member of online discussion forums including imdb and IGN; so it is possible to tell him that he sucks directly; not that doing so has had any effect thus far.

By: atom128

atom128 — Sat, 01 Oct 2005 03:28:40 -0800

Is there a new link to the Alone in the Dark trailer? The post you link to links to a 404.

By: nthdegx

nthdegx — Sat, 01 Oct 2005 03:33:44 -0800

Alone in the Dark trailer.

By: terpsichoria

terpsichoria — Sat, 01 Oct 2005 04:08:35 -0800

Boll's House of the Dead adaptation doesn't have a house in it. It occasionally cuts to unedited footage of the arcade game, too, for no discernible reason. The man's a genius, and I honestly hope he gets the Half-Life license - the game does such a good job of telling the story in a competent fashion that I'd love to see a really grindingly awful Boll version, just for contrast's sake. And wouldn't a Metal Gear Solid movie be a bit redundant? You could just edit together the interminable cutscenes from all three games, and end up with a film at least as entertaining as a Boll opus.

By: beelzbubba

beelzbubba — Sat, 01 Oct 2005 04:44:49 -0800

Am I missing something? I probably am, since IANAGP. Still, movie adaptations of video games and people are expecting (pick any that apply) art, cinema, a non-idiotic movie? I don't get it.

By: RavinDave

RavinDave — Sat, 01 Oct 2005 04:55:32 -0800

I'd be slow to blame directors for trailers; few have any control over that aspect of marketing. Even heavy-weight directors bow to non-creative bean-counters here. And these days, it seems like the process it completely ass-backwards. So much money is involved that movies are often greenlighted only AFTER the script is given to some company tasked to extracts the commercial quality "beats" of the story and produce a detailed ad campaign and AFTER a mock-up trailer is story-boarded in excrutiating detail. All this before a single millimeter of film is shot. This is a recipe for suckage.

By: clevershark

clevershark — Sat, 01 Oct 2005 05:00:56 -0800

Apple apparently insists that I install iTunes with Quicktime, so it looks like I shan't be seeing the trailer for that masterpiece of movie-making...

By: joelf

joelf — Sat, 01 Oct 2005 05:17:12 -0800

Some people I know in my home town decided to make a public service announcement about him.

By: punilux

punilux — Sat, 01 Oct 2005 05:28:20 -0800

clevershark : Quicktime w/o iTunes.

By: clevershark

clevershark — Sat, 01 Oct 2005 05:31:08 -0800

Thanks punilux. I must be going blind in my old age...

By: Busithoth

Busithoth — Sat, 01 Oct 2005 05:56:38 -0800

joelf, that was a great PSA. Far Cry? That game lends itself to a movie better than any other game out in the last couple of years. Half Life would be a crime, too. Then again, why should video games be excempt from terrible adaptations when books have been subjected to the same since the appearence of talkies? Alone in the Dark almost had me renting it via Netflix, but Tara Reid outweighs the iota of Cthulhian beauty which might have survived Boll's touch.

By: birdherder

birdherder — Sat, 01 Oct 2005 06:11:00 -0800

I've always put movies based on games in the same category as movies based on old TV shows. Both types of movies seem like Hollywood being lazy and not coming up with original ideas. Even without a hack like Boll, I don't think some of the games translate well into film. It isn't a criticism of the game or its fans, but just a fact of life. What aside from the storyline and graphics, what makes a game great is the game play itself. And you can't have that in a theatre full of other people. If anything Boll's terrible directing may help kill this trend in Hollywood and the studios won't rush to green light a film adaptation of a game based solely on the game's popularity as a game.

By: jmcmurry

jmcmurry — Sat, 01 Oct 2005 06:14:55 -0800

We've discussed it before, before. This is my favorite of the terrible review quotes from when this movie was released: "If you took the 100 worst ideas ever conceived for a science-fiction film, rattled them around in a Lotto tumbler and spilled them out onto the screen at random, you could not produce a more asinine hodgepodge than Alone in the Dark." -- Colin Covert, MINNEAPOLIS STAR TRIBUNE There's more where that came from at rottentomatoes.com.

By: melt away

melt away — Sat, 01 Oct 2005 06:25:57 -0800

What were some good video game movies? I can't think of any...

By: johngoren

johngoren — Sat, 01 Oct 2005 06:27:39 -0800

Before House of the Dead came out, I did a preview story for a movie magazine. The producer assured me that the movie was going to be extremely classy, conscientiously made, and true to the George Romero tradition. That was my lesson in movie hype.

By: clubfoote

clubfoote — Sat, 01 Oct 2005 06:28:54 -0800

....TRON

By: effugas

effugas — Sat, 01 Oct 2005 06:33:19 -0800

Melt-- Mortal Kombat was shockingly good. Doom looks like it'll be a crapfest, but meh. The fundamental problem is ... well, I had this great thing, but even better to just quote Neil Gaiman (and Joss Whedon's) fantastic Time magazine interview:

"NG: Yes. It really is this thing of executives loving the smell of their own urine and urinating on things. And then more execs come in, and they urinate. And then the next round. By the end, they have this thing which just smells like pee, and nobody likes it."

Amen. Side note, can we bid against Boll for the Fallout rights? I mean, seriously.

By: Navek Rednam

Navek Rednam — Sat, 01 Oct 2005 06:54:25 -0800

Uwe Boll could well be the film version of Derek Smart.

By: Pretty_Generic

Pretty_Generic — Sat, 01 Oct 2005 06:55:47 -0800

THIS HOLIDAY SEASON EVERYTHING FALLS DOWN Uwe Boll's Tetris the Movie

By: silence

silence — Sat, 01 Oct 2005 07:00:54 -0800

Lets just hope Boll doesn't get the rights to ICO. Actually, it's kind of interesting that the video game of Alone in the Dark was infinitely more thoughtful, emotive and even scary than this film seems to be (haven't seen it). Seeing how bad film can be when put in service of a mercenary like Boll who's only interest is in milking a target demographic makes one realise that perhaps the reason most games are so shit is the economic and cultural swamp that they're currently wallowing in. When game publishers eventually discover that if they keep behaving like Bolls and produce games only for american teenage boys then even that market will sooner or later get bored and drift off.

By: eriko

eriko — Sat, 01 Oct 2005 07:01:27 -0800

God damn, P_G, you win AGAIN.

By: Pretty_Generic

Pretty_Generic — Sat, 01 Oct 2005 07:09:00 -0800

I should be a professional comedian.

By: esch

esch — Sat, 01 Oct 2005 07:15:43 -0800

"Saying Uwe Boll's Alone in the Dark is better than his 2003 American debut House of the Dead is akin to praising syphilis for not being HIV." -- Nicholas Schager, SLANT MAGAZINE I think that's the funniest thing I've ever read.

By: Pretty_Generic

Pretty_Generic — Sat, 01 Oct 2005 07:16:37 -0800

The Half-Life backstory is so good and so little covered in the games that it could easily produce a good film. SO I HAVE TOTAL FAITH IN UWE BOLL-WEEVIL

By: hindmost

hindmost — Sat, 01 Oct 2005 07:27:06 -0800

Unfortunately, P_G, someone already beat you to it.

By: Navek Rednam

Navek Rednam — Sat, 01 Oct 2005 07:41:56 -0800

THIS HOLIDAY SEASON EVERYTHING FALLS DOWN Uwe Boll's Tetris the Movie "More shocking than 9/11" - New York Times.

By: ph00dz

ph00dz — Sat, 01 Oct 2005 07:57:11 -0800

Super Mario Brothers was a pretty entertaining videogame movie. If nothing else, it's something... different.

By: ROU_Xenophobe

ROU_Xenophobe — Sat, 01 Oct 2005 08:11:45 -0800

What were some good video game movies? Resident Evil wasn't terrible. Not high cinema or nothin', but an acceptable zombie flick, and Milla "Couldn't keep her clothes on if she tried" Jovovich was decent, as was Michelle Rodrih-gweez. Myself I am waiting for Jerry Bruckheimer's Battleship starring Terry Gross and Meeeeeeeeeeeeeeeshell Norris from NPR as two plucky destroyer captains caught in a conflict they never made.

By: hototogisu

hototogisu — Sat, 01 Oct 2005 08:22:11 -0800

"one man stood up to the system, and said 'nein'" joelf, that was great...

By: KevinSkomsvold

KevinSkomsvold — Sat, 01 Oct 2005 08:47:31 -0800

Any truth to the rumor that Michael Cimino is bringing "Burger Time" to the big screen?

By: signal

signal — Sat, 01 Oct 2005 08:50:53 -0800

clubfoote writes '....TRON' Actually, Tron was a movie before being a video game, so no cigar.

By: Foosnark

Foosnark — Sat, 01 Oct 2005 09:14:17 -0800

Before coming here, I was just commenting to my wife that DOOM was going to suck hard, but Half-Life could possibly be a good movie with the right producer, director and writer. Now I wish I hadn't said that. :P

By: Faint of Butt

Faint of Butt — Sat, 01 Oct 2005 09:17:20 -0800

I am forced to conclude that Uwe Boll hates video games, and wants to see the entire medium destroyed.

By: tweak

tweak — Sat, 01 Oct 2005 09:38:41 -0800

Faint of Butt: Penny Arcade suggests that reason as well. Also, this and this are good sendups of Boll.

By: Samizdata

Samizdata — Sat, 01 Oct 2005 09:42:29 -0800

Dear (deity of your choice), please... no... Not Fallout... Please... No...

By: o0o0o

o0o0o — Sat, 01 Oct 2005 10:39:48 -0800

terpsichoria: "Boll's House of the Dead adaptation doesn't have a house in it." Yes, it does. The house is just very small and under-used. Almost an afterthought.

By: hypocritical ross

hypocritical ross — Sat, 01 Oct 2005 12:04:35 -0800

compulsory viewings of The Wizard are in order.

By: gramschmidt

gramschmidt — Sat, 01 Oct 2005 12:05:27 -0800

I haven't paid attention to sports in twelve or thirteen years, but when I first heard who was directing House of the Dead, I immediately thought, "Whoa, Uwe Blab is a director?"

By: quin

quin — Sat, 01 Oct 2005 12:34:10 -0800

Resident Evil wasn't terrible Actually, i thought that the first Resident Evil was pretty damn good. i thought that Paul W.S. Anderson's direction made for the best video game to movie that i have seen thus far. Even if you completely ignore it's video game heritage, it's a bad ass zombie flick in it's own right. Resident Evil 2 however, just sucked.

By: Sibrax

Sibrax — Sat, 01 Oct 2005 14:14:19 -0800

The Alone in the Dark trailer linked above is nothing like the one that got its own post. The old trailer brought tears to my eyes, truly. Tears of pain. But alas, all traces of it have been removed from the internet.

By: The Cardinal

The Cardinal — Sat, 01 Oct 2005 14:49:47 -0800

I had always had higher hopes for DOOM the movie than any Uwe Boll project. I guess I will get to see if I was correct now.

By: ROU_Xenophobe

ROU_Xenophobe — Sat, 01 Oct 2005 15:08:50 -0800

Doom at least has Mr. The Rock in it. So whatever else happens and however horrible it is otherwise, Doom will have, at its core, a little kernel of grace and charisma.

By: iviken

iviken — Sat, 01 Oct 2005 15:12:25 -0800

More "Alone in the dark" here: (rating: 9. Extreme dislike or disgust.) Entertainment Weekly: "The film on your teeth after a three-day drunk possesses more cinematic value." NYTimes: "This horror film, spun off from an old Atari video game, is so inept on every level, you wonder why the distributor didn't release it straight to video, or better, toss it directly into the trash." Who's to blame for dr. Boll's movies? "A loophole in German tax law that is supported by contributors and actually rewards movies that perform badly, via a writeoff at the end of the year." Profiting on movies that actually lose money...sounds familiar. However, according to the Wikipedia article: "It has been recently reported that the loophole in German tax law has been revised. Starting January 2006, contributors to failed films will no longer be able to profit from failed films through a tax writeoff at the end of the year. This may well result in an end to Boll's film career, as it would make it impossible for him to capitalize on films that fail at the box office, resulting in a loss of investors."

By: kosher_jenny

kosher_jenny — Sat, 01 Oct 2005 15:53:54 -0800

Lets just hope Boll doesn't get the rights to ICO. Way to make sure that I wake up in a cold sweat every night from now on, silence.

By: Sullenshady

Sullenshady — Sat, 01 Oct 2005 15:58:45 -0800

That Final Fantasy CGI movie was decent, if a little too Uncanny Valley

By: condour75

condour75 — Sat, 01 Oct 2005 16:06:12 -0800

Wasn't My Dinner with Andre based loosely on Pac-Man?

By: dobbs

dobbs — Sat, 01 Oct 2005 16:19:57 -0800

Alone in the Dark was indeed shit. But it wasn't nearly as shit as I assumed it was gonna be. I shut it off after about 30 minutes, unlike, say, Dreamcatcher, which I've watched 3 times all the way through because it is so fucking awful that it's one of the better comedies of the last 20 years. Trixie is another film that was far, far worse than Alone in the Dark. In fact, my friends and I refer to movies like this: "How bad was it? Was it Trixie-bad or Dreamcatcher-bad?" "I Dudits!" Nothing I've ever seen is as bad as either of these movies. And I've seen a lot of bad movies.

By: aaronetc

aaronetc — Sat, 01 Oct 2005 16:30:56 -0800

I saw the trailer for DOOM before SERENITY this afternoon, and if there is any justice in the world it will force the Rock out of filmmaking and into next year's Houston Texans open tryouts. There aren't enough Alan Smithees in Hollywood to take credit for it. Half the trailer -- half! -- is comprised of FPP shots that fairly scream "OMG, it's just like teh game, this r0x0rs!!!1!!11! LOL!!1!!!11!!!" Presumably we'll be getting QUAKE next summer.

By: Bugbread

Bugbread — Sat, 01 Oct 2005 16:35:01 -0800

Dobbs: Totally off-topic (er...off "video game movies by Uwe Boll suck" topic, that is, but on "bad movies" topic): I agree that Dreamcatcher was just plain painfully bad, and I haven't read the book, but from what I read somewhere, the dumb shit in the movie actually makes a bit of sense in the book: Dudits has the power (unconscious) to make what he dreams come true (though, not being a lucid dreamer, he can't control it). As such, all the weird shit that happens is actually a result of his dreaming of a situation that would bring his childhood friends back, as they abandoned him in their middle age/due to his leukemia (can't remember exactly), and it gets weirder and weirder just because he's dreaming deeper and deeper. So he's the "hero", but only by dint of the fact that he's the one who dreamed the whole damn thing into existence in the first place. But, no, of course, that doesn't in any way vindicate the movie. I'm not sure Jesus and Buddha together could do anything to vindicate that movie.

By: Atreides

Atreides — Sat, 01 Oct 2005 17:09:57 -0800

I watched the Doom trailer online and while I won't pay money to go see it in the theaters, I hope for those that do they do not use the horrid first person game like shots anymore than the collective time in the trailer. I can just imagine people falling in the aisle throwing up from motion sickness. That or screaming out, "Why didn't he IDKFA!!11!"

By: gompa

gompa — Sat, 01 Oct 2005 17:58:12 -0800

Wasn't My Dinner with Andre based loosely on Pac-Man? More of a pastiche, really. Wallace Shawn's character, for example, was an amalgam of the red ghost, Donkey Kong's Mario, and the oddly angled blip that zooms around the outer rim of the geometric grids in Tempest. Also: Great line. Any truth to the rumor that Michael Cimino is bringing "Burger Time" to the big screen? If Christopher Walken gets cast as the pickle, I'm there, dude.

By: jonp72

jonp72 — Sat, 01 Oct 2005 18:03:17 -0800

Too bad Uwe Boll is overshadowing the 1982 slasher movie, Alone in the Dark, which featured some enjoyable scenery chewing from slumming future Oscar winners, Martin Landau and Jack Palance. I mean, how many 80s slasher movies had good enough casting to have not one, but two future Best Supporting Actors?

By: gompa

gompa — Sat, 01 Oct 2005 18:06:14 -0800

how many 80s slasher movies had good enough casting to have not one, but two future Best Supporting Actors? Wait, I know this one. Is it the same as the number of 80s sci-fi/action flicks that starred two future governors?

By: brundlefly

brundlefly — Sun, 02 Oct 2005 00:03:49 -0800

From the review that made me want to see Alone In the Dark: As I sat through that scene, and the rest of the jumbled mess that followed, I began to consider the film contextually, and I came to the conclusion that it's developmentally disabled. In high school I worked with retarded adults, and many of them would develop habits that they learned from people around them without understanding them. Alone in the Dark is like that. It sees how other movies act, and it tries to be like them. But there's some critical circuitry in its pointy little filmic head that isn't wired, and it just becomes a shambling mockery of what we know as cinema. I mean, it has all the requirements that make it a "movie" – still images are projected in rapid succession, creating through the persistence of vision the illusion of movement – but nothing else about it would indicate that it was anything more than a hallucination, perhaps brought on by ingesting way too many hot peppers.

By: weretable and the undead chairs

weretable and the undead chairs — Sun, 02 Oct 2005 08:21:26 -0800

A Castlevania movie would never be done the way I would want it to be anyway, but if Uwe Boll gets the rights, I might have to hunt him down and make like Simon Belmont dispatching Dracula.

By: dobbs

dobbs — Sun, 02 Oct 2005 21:33:02 -0800

bugbread, I also haven't read the book but on the extras for the DVD, screenwriter William Goldman says (paraphrasing), "It was a very hard book to adapt. I took out everything that wasn't cinematic... and they Larry Kasdan put it all back in." He sounds miserable when he says it. And then they cut to Kasdan saying *exactly* the same thing but in an upbeat way as if it was pure genius to put everything uncinematic back in. :)