<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
    xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
     xmlns:admin="http://webns.net/mvcb/"
     xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
     xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#">
	<channel> 

	<title>Comments on: Comments on 458</title>
	<link>http://www.metafilter.com/458//</link>
	<description>Comments on MetaFilter post Comments on 458</description>
	<pubDate></pubDate>
	<lastBuildDate></lastBuildDate>
	<language>en-us</language>
	<docs>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/tech/rss</docs>
	<ttl>60</ttl>

	<item>
		<title>Post number 458</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/458/</link>	
		<description>&lt;a href="http://slashdot.org/article.pl?sid=99/12/29/2019219&amp;mode=thread"&gt;Thank god, a judge was smart enough to throw out an injunction&lt;/a&gt; against all the web site owners that &lt;a href=&apos;http://www.dibona.com/social/dvd/code/index.shtml&apos;&gt;posted the DeCSS source code&lt;/a&gt;. This suit was completely pointless because DeCSS is used for *playback* of DVDs, not copying (which can be done bit-for-bit digitally). The people who should be punished for this are the dorks that came up with the weak encryption in the first place.</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">post:www.metafilter.com,1999:site.458</guid>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Dec 1999 19:25:24 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>mathowie</dc:creator>		<category>Slashdot</category>		<category>USlaw</category>		<category>DeCSS</category>		<category>source</category>		<category>DVD</category>		<category>encryption</category>		<category>DRM</category>
	</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
