Comments on: Stellarium

Stellarium

fire&wings — Mon, 07 Nov 2005 17:32:14 -0800

Stellarium. A free program which renders realistic skies in real time, and more. Handy for anyone who ever wrangled with one of these. And very cool to watch in fast forward.

By: fandango_matt

fandango_matt — Mon, 07 Nov 2005 17:44:10 -0800

Neat. I like everything about it except the Star Trek font.

By: snsranch

snsranch — Mon, 07 Nov 2005 17:56:28 -0800

Sweet! I recently posted this question to AksMe and got some great lessons. I'm going to love sharing this with the kids. Awesome and thanks.

By: Wolfdog

Wolfdog — Mon, 07 Nov 2005 18:13:30 -0800

This is great.

By: Wet Spot

Wet Spot — Mon, 07 Nov 2005 18:32:47 -0800

Also fun. (Shockwave; click to control speed and direction.)

By: fungible

fungible — Mon, 07 Nov 2005 18:46:12 -0800

Awesome. Also, wet spot's contribution should be my new screensaver.

By: wilful

wilful — Mon, 07 Nov 2005 19:03:21 -0800

Thank you!

By: arcticwoman

arcticwoman — Mon, 07 Nov 2005 19:05:41 -0800

That looks like a great program.

By: joeblough

joeblough — Mon, 07 Nov 2005 19:13:49 -0800

wow. thanks for that link. a similar free program is celestia, which is cool because you can actually "go" to all sorts of objects in the observable universe and look back. its mind blowing to zoom out from home and see just how empty space really is.

By: selfnoise

selfnoise — Mon, 07 Nov 2005 19:28:56 -0800

This is sweet. And I second the recommend for Celestia: also sweet. Thank you one and all!

By: weapons-grade pandemonium

weapons-grade pandemonium — Mon, 07 Nov 2005 19:48:49 -0800

Wow. Thanks, fw.

By: brundlefly

brundlefly — Mon, 07 Nov 2005 20:19:20 -0800

Gorgeous! Really strange when you turn on the constellation art...

By: xthlc

xthlc — Mon, 07 Nov 2005 21:23:35 -0800

Great link, thanks. Light pollution means that I only get to see the stars about once a year. :(

By: jiawen

jiawen — Mon, 07 Nov 2005 22:58:19 -0800

joeblough, remember that a big reason why so much of space seems to be empty in Celestia is that, the further a dwarf star is from us, the less likely that we actually know of its existence. In other words, if you move 5000 LY out from the Sun in Celestia, space will seem a lot sparser because we just don't know as many stars out there as we do locally. Celestia is a hell of a lot of fun, though. I also use KStars and Xephem. KStars has a much prettier interface and seems to have more general-user features, but Xephem prints better and is more specialized.

By: Smedleyman

Smedleyman — Tue, 08 Nov 2005 00:54:02 -0800

Entirely kick ass. I've been looking for something exactly like this.

By: spock

spock — Tue, 08 Nov 2005 07:22:00 -0800

May I say that this rocks (very hard). Thanks for the link. The only thing better would be if it could also drive the stepper motors on a alt-az scope mount or read position from encoders. Point to this (known) star and click, point to that (2nd known) star and click. Bingo - it can now convert any point in the sky with the number of steps needed on the appropriate stepper motor (guess it would also have to know how many steps on the stepper motor it would take to do a 360 in order to calculate the stepper "resolution"). I'd love to be able to drive stepper motors from my powerbook.

By: gren

gren — Tue, 08 Nov 2005 07:22:51 -0800

Bill Arnett brings us a list of the many many 'plane arium' apps out there, covering every major OS (and some not so major) as well as apps for handheld devices. Included are links to some web based tools, as well as links to the raw data that powers most of the above mentioned applications. Updated recently, this is the best place to start your search for some great astronomical tools.

By: Eideteker

Eideteker — Tue, 08 Nov 2005 09:15:34 -0800

What's fun with these programs is to show someone who believes in the Zodiac what sign the sun was actually in when they were born. Last time I checked, the sun is about a month behind where the zodiac says it should be. Pesky precession of the earth's axis!

By: chrismear

chrismear — Tue, 08 Nov 2005 12:37:32 -0800

a similar free program is celestia, which is cool because you can actually "go" to all sorts of objects in the observable universe and look back. I love Celestia, but I have to take it in small doses. What with all the accidentally flying into the Sun and the moment of shock when you realise you're going so fast that the stars are starting to parallax... apart from a couple of scary films when I was a kid, flying around in Celestia is the only media experience that has literally filled me with terror on more than one occasion. Highly recommended.

By: Lynsey

Lynsey — Tue, 08 Nov 2005 18:54:34 -0800

Most excellent linkage. Thank you, fire&wings!

By: jiawen

jiawen — Tue, 08 Nov 2005 21:24:29 -0800

Quoth spock:

The only thing better would be if it could also drive the stepper motors on a alt-az scope mount or read position from encoders. Point to this (known) star and click, point to that (2nd known) star and click. Bingo - it can now convert any point in the sky with the number of steps needed on the appropriate stepper motor (guess it would also have to know how many steps on the stepper motor it would take to do a 360 in order to calculate the stepper "resolution"). I'd love to be able to drive stepper motors from my powerbook.

I believe that both the programs I linked to, KStars and Xephem, have this ability. I haven't used them, so I don't know how well they work, but there are menu items for interfacing with telescope drives.