Clinton tells Rolling Stone: 'I probably would have run again'
December 7, 2000 10:22 AM   Subscribe

Clinton tells Rolling Stone: 'I probably would have run again'

Excerpt: "Does he think he'd have been a three-time winner? "Yes. I do. But it's hard to say, because it's entirely academic," Clinton said."
posted by owillis (14 comments total)

 
You can hear some of the interview here
posted by owillis at 10:26 AM on December 7, 2000


http://www.justkeepbill.com/
posted by mathowie at 10:37 AM on December 7, 2000


He probably would've beaten Bush but would've gotten his ass kicked by McCain.
posted by gyc at 11:03 AM on December 7, 2000


hell, they should just dump gore and bush and keep clinton in office...he definitely would have won.

would be interesting to see what response the american people would have to a suggestion of keeping clinton in office.
posted by physics at 11:05 AM on December 7, 2000


Gimme a break, the GOP is too reactionary to actually give McCain the nomination.
posted by snakey at 11:39 AM on December 7, 2000


Clinton > Gore > Bush
posted by PWA_BadBoy at 11:45 AM on December 7, 2000


Clinton would have won in a huge landslide, no matter who ran aginst him. He's the greatest B.S. artist in my lifetime and people love him for it. That's exactly what we expect from politicians these days!
posted by Mr. skullhead at 12:28 PM on December 7, 2000


Frankly, at this point I'll take anyone with two legs. Can anyone with two legs please be our president? Oh yeah, they have to have two legs and be alive as well. Can anyone with two legs and who's alive please be our president?

There, while all of you guys were complaining, I went and got us a new president. Shows what you can do when you get off your duff and put a little effort into it.
posted by leo at 12:32 PM on December 7, 2000


dammit, you just ruined my plans to become president by goin out and getting us a new president.
posted by gyc at 12:48 PM on December 7, 2000


It wasn't as hard as I thought, and look at all the advantages: we still get a president with two legs and who's still alive.
posted by leo at 12:52 PM on December 7, 2000


Since when did you have to have two legs in order to be President?
posted by lagado at 2:39 PM on December 7, 2000


It's a buyers' market. I could afford to be choosey.
posted by leo at 2:52 PM on December 7, 2000


I would have voted for him again.
posted by DragonBoy at 2:58 PM on December 7, 2000


Same here. The intellegence of Gore and the charisma of Bush. Clinton is one reason we're not satisfied with either choice this time around -- both canidates pale in comparison.
posted by jragon at 4:12 PM on December 7, 2000


« Older Own a piece of History!   |   The Male Minority Newer »


This thread has been archived and is closed to new comments