I've always wondered what Web 2.0 was ... so it's just another business scam, huh? posted by mrgrimm at 10:28 AM on November 23, 2005
i was expecting a Goopy logo. posted by sporky at 10:37 AM on November 23, 2005
The validator is fantastic posted by soplerfo at 10:41 AM on November 23, 2005
Goopy makes much better logos. posted by mathowie at 10:54 AM on November 23, 2005
I'm waiting for web 3.11 for workgroups. posted by Tacodog at 10:57 AM on November 23, 2005
Sorry, I was using Goopy as a general adjective, but I had no idea that it was also a pre-reserved proper noun. posted by brownpau at 11:06 AM on November 23, 2005
As a mac shareware programmer, I really like this "Web 2.0" deal.
With firefox & Apple's WebKit, making cross-platform (to linux and Windows) apps is pretty easy now, and JavaScript rocks as a lightweight programming language, much more expressive and convenient than C, C++, Java or Objective-C (haven't used C# yet but it's mostly like Java I guess).
CSS is pretty awesome for creating L&F, and the retained-mode DOM is a very nice foundation for creating a UI.
My apps run reasonably well on my 800Mhz PBG4, and simply fly on my 2-year-old 2.6Ghz P4. posted by Heywood Mogroot at 11:19 AM on November 23, 2005
According to the validator, Metafilter.com (score: 2/11) beats BaseCampHQ.com (score: 1/11). So far, I've been unable to find a site which scores higher (and most web apps score 0).
Clearly, Web 2.0 is MetaFilter. posted by dhartung at 1:59 PM on November 23, 2005
Man...I'm shocked at all these apparently smart, skilled people who don't know how to define web 2.0. It's not rocket science, geez. Clearly people need degrees in the humanities to understand it. posted by Hildegarde at 5:49 PM on November 23, 2005
posted by vacapinta at 9:33 AM on November 23, 2005