neet.
December 7, 2005 7:03 AM   Subscribe

Tryptophan-5ht's kickass artwork. [via projects. NSFW: some artistic nudity]
posted by delmoi (25 comments total)


 
My favorite today (yes, I'm juvenile).
posted by brain_drain at 7:11 AM on December 7, 2005


Wow, that is nice. He's got a real sense of line wieght (something that's always given me trouble), and his drafting is solid, especially cross-hatching. Good stuff.
posted by klangklangston at 7:12 AM on December 7, 2005


No fair. All I can draw is a bath.
posted by debralee at 7:21 AM on December 7, 2005


I don't understand how to make things appear. When I click on links, all I get are words and squares. Am I supposed to click the squares for every image I want to see?
posted by jacquilynne at 7:23 AM on December 7, 2005


Trouble? I can't even spell line weight!
posted by klangklangston at 7:26 AM on December 7, 2005


It's a lovely site but you may have to view it in Firefox or IE to see the great pictures. On Safari they're smushed over on the right hand side. Thanks for posting this.
posted by jessamyn at 7:27 AM on December 7, 2005


I looked through this site yesterday and thought it was great! Nice post.
posted by OmieWise at 7:35 AM on December 7, 2005


Generally, artistic nudes are considered SFW. They are not porn. Unless your work place considers art to be dangerous. In which case you have bigger problems when you consider "NSFW" artwork hangs in public museums and public buildings all over the nation. (sometimes I think people put "NSFW" to draw more attention).
posted by stbalbach at 8:19 AM on December 7, 2005


stbalbach: Your point is correct in theory, but it doesn't work in practice. If someone passing by my office sees boobies on my monitor, they aren't going to assess whether they are artistic boobies, they are just going to shake their heads and tell everyone I am a pervert. delmoi's warning is appropriate.
posted by brain_drain at 8:40 AM on December 7, 2005


jacquilynne, the site's a bit of a mess. The images are on the FAR right (to the right of the nav), yet there are no horizontal scrollbars so the only way to see them is to have a huge monitor and open the browser all the way. I'm on a 20" widescreen monitor and they just fit on my screen. I'm on Safari. Presumably it doesn't work this way on some other browsers.
posted by dobbs at 8:44 AM on December 7, 2005


Yep, this site is well stuffed on Safari.

Thumbnails on the far right look good on preview.
posted by rawfishy at 8:46 AM on December 7, 2005


!
posted by drezdn at 8:48 AM on December 7, 2005


Well that's it, I will never draw again.
posted by plexiwatt at 8:51 AM on December 7, 2005


Yeah, nice stuff. Tell the man/woman that he/she needs to fix that damn site for us Safari-using saps, though.
posted by sluggo at 8:56 AM on December 7, 2005


Our own Jay.Jansheski has a cool art site, too. (Say hey to Lynn for me, Mr. Chessking!)
posted by kimota at 9:09 AM on December 7, 2005


I'm pretty sure I like every one of those images. Awesome.
posted by Witty at 9:39 AM on December 7, 2005


I think I stared at the cigarette for a solid 5 minutes.
posted by Witty at 9:44 AM on December 7, 2005


[this is good]
posted by bshort at 9:50 AM on December 7, 2005


Holy shit.
posted by Jairus at 10:13 AM on December 7, 2005


Yeah awesome stuff. Wish I could draw /snif
posted by scarabic at 10:47 AM on December 7, 2005


Really great work. This is going to send me to my sketch pad where I will try to draw something - anything - for five minutes before giving up in frustration.
posted by LeeJay at 1:36 PM on December 7, 2005


Good work. The Zombie Willem Dafoe was my favourite, for pure uncanniness.
posted by MetaMonkey at 1:39 PM on December 7, 2005


safari folks - sorry! :( i don't have a mac, or even access to one. im working on a barebones list of links to art just for you guys. Im not giving you the finger - i swear.
posted by Tryptophan-5ht at 3:44 PM on December 7, 2005


How much do you charge for web design, by the way?
posted by delmoi at 9:31 PM on December 7, 2005


because someone has to say it: meh.
posted by Hat Maui at 11:56 PM on December 7, 2005


« Older Bubble collapses are, like, so 2001   |   isometrics for everyone! Newer »


This thread has been archived and is closed to new comments