<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
    xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
     xmlns:admin="http://webns.net/mvcb/"
     xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
     xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#">
	<channel> 

	<title>Comments on: Comments on 4788</title>
	<link>http://www.metafilter.com/4788//</link>
	<description>Comments on MetaFilter post Comments on 4788</description>
	<pubDate>Wed, 13 Dec 2000 14:12:22 -0800</pubDate>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 13 Dec 2000 14:12:22 -0800</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en-us</language>
	<docs>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/tech/rss</docs>
	<ttl>60</ttl>

	<item>
		<title>Post number 4788</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/4788/</link>	
		<description>Is Metallica really concerned that &lt;a href=&quot;http://dailynews.yahoo.com/h/eo/20001213/en/metallica_perfume_stinks__4.html&quot;&gt; a perfume &lt;/a&gt; will harm their bottom line and so they must sue?  My question is why would &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.guerlain.com&quot;&gt; Guerlain &lt;/a&gt; name a perfume after a heavy metal band unless it smelled like stale cigarettes and beer?</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">post:www.metafilter.com,2000:site.4788</guid>
		<pubDate>Wed, 13 Dec 2000 13:49:01 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>thc</dc:creator>		<category>brokenlink</category>		<category>news</category>		<category>copyright</category>		<category>metallica</category>		<category>perfume</category>		<category>guerlain</category>
	</item>	<item>
		<title>By: tomorama</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/4788/#35087</link>	
		<description>Seems like Metallica is very trigger happy these days with their &quot;sick the lawyers&quot; button. I can understand protecting your name, I suppose, but overall it seems like they&apos;re just suing the pants of everybody. I like their music, but I don&apos;t know about their character anymore. I also heard that Lars was heading up a protest in San Francisco against dotcoms, because all the startups are &quot;taking up space&quot; that the artists could be using. Feh!</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:www.metafilter.com,2000:site.4788-35087</guid>
		<pubDate>Wed, 13 Dec 2000 14:12:22 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>tomorama</dc:creator>
	</item>	<item>
		<title>By: tomorama</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/4788/#35094</link>	
		<description>I can&apos;t help but get the feeling that Mr. Ulrich was the kind of kid who would never share the blocks with anyone in kindergarten.</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:www.metafilter.com,2000:site.4788-35094</guid>
		<pubDate>Wed, 13 Dec 2000 14:29:13 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>tomorama</dc:creator>
	</item>	<item>
		<title>By: solistrato</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/4788/#35101</link>	
		<description>Topic drift alert:

Now that every dot-com and its brother is going down in flames, are the real estate prices coming down in S.F.?</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:www.metafilter.com,2000:site.4788-35101</guid>
		<pubDate>Wed, 13 Dec 2000 14:55:32 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>solistrato</dc:creator>
	</item>	<item>
		<title>By: Dreama</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/4788/#35118</link>	
		<description>Have Metallica trademarked their name, like Billy Joel and Chicago have?  If so, they&apos;ve got a claim, like it or not.</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:www.metafilter.com,2000:site.4788-35118</guid>
		<pubDate>Wed, 13 Dec 2000 15:46:40 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Dreama</dc:creator>
	</item>	<item>
		<title>By: dagnyscott</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/4788/#35170</link>	
		<description>How do you trademark a name like &quot;Chicago&quot;? I mean, it has a few non-musical connotations, like a little town here on Lake Michigan...</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:www.metafilter.com,2000:site.4788-35170</guid>
		<pubDate>Wed, 13 Dec 2000 19:32:35 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>dagnyscott</dc:creator>
	</item>	<item>
		<title>By: attitude</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/4788/#35193</link>	
		<description>Yes, they have trademarked their name. And no, that does not give them a claim to every product that shares their name. They have a trademark relating to a musical group, not a perfume.</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:www.metafilter.com,2000:site.4788-35193</guid>
		<pubDate>Wed, 13 Dec 2000 21:24:10 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>attitude</dc:creator>
	</item>	<item>
		<title>By: Dreama</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/4788/#35392</link>	
		<description>However -- and I say this without knowledge either way -- if the product is being marketed with a tacit attempt at tying it to the Metallica name then there could be a claim for infringement. </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:www.metafilter.com,2000:site.4788-35392</guid>
		<pubDate>Thu, 14 Dec 2000 13:09:40 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Dreama</dc:creator>
	</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
