He never seemed to do anything worthy of his iconic status except really wanting to be an icon.Exactly.
For all you haters, Rollins is also involved with the USO.No kiddin'.
As a result he ruled for several years as the preeminent darling of Details magazine, a periodical handbook for the young executive on the rise, where rebellion has achieved a perfect synthesis with corporate ideology. In 1992 Details named Rollins a "rock `n' roll samurai," an "emblem ... of a new masculinity" whose "enlightened honesty" is "a way of being that seems to flesh out many of the ideas expressed in contemporary culture and fashion." In 1994 the magazine consummated its relationship with Rollins by naming him "Man of the Year," printing a fawning story about his muscular worldview and decorating its cover with a photo in which Rollins displays his tattoos and rubs his chin in a thoughtful manner.Attributing to Rollins, as a mark of his hypocrisy, what Details says about him, doesn't make a lot of sense. Also, I think the very last line is a cheap shot --- anyone who wants to succeed at anything difficult, I would think, had better subscribe to that same "fabled ethic."
Details found Rollins to be such an appropriate role model for the struggling young businessman not only because of his music-product, but because of his excellent "self-styled identity," which the magazine describes in terms normally reserved for the breast-beating and soul-searching variety of motivational seminars. Although he derives it from the quality-maximizing wisdom of the East rather than the unfashionable doctrines of Calvin, Rollins' rebel posture is identical to that fabled ethic of the small capitalist whose regimen of positive thinking and hard work will one day pay off.
« Older It's the Australian Blog Awards!... | The site design is somewhat un... Newer »
This thread has been archived and is closed to new comments
posted by Slack-a-gogo at 9:43 AM on January 14, 2006