<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
    xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
     xmlns:admin="http://webns.net/mvcb/"
     xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
     xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#">
	<channel> 

	<title>Comments on: Community Forums Sharing Ad Revenue with Users?</title>
	<link>http://www.metafilter.com/48302/Community-Forums-Sharing-Ad-Revenue-with-Users/</link>
	<description>Comments on MetaFilter post Community Forums Sharing Ad Revenue with Users?</description>
	<pubDate>Mon, 16 Jan 2006 09:37:00 -0800</pubDate>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 16 Jan 2006 09:37:00 -0800</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en-us</language>
	<docs>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/tech/rss</docs>
	<ttl>60</ttl>

	<item>
		<title>Community Forums Sharing Ad Revenue with Users?</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/48302/Community-Forums-Sharing-Ad-Revenue-with-Users</link>	
		<description>The New York Times &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.nytimes.com/2006/01/16/technology/16ecom.html&quot;&gt;reports&lt;/a&gt; that community forum sites like &lt;a href=&quot;http://forums.digitalpoint.com&quot;&gt;Digital Point Solutions&apos;&lt;/a&gt;   have created a system whereby forum participants share in the Google AdSense revenue (&lt;a href=&quot;http://forums.digitalpoint.com/faq.php?faq=revenue_sharing#faq_how_does_this_work&quot;&gt;Revenue sharing FAQ&lt;/a&gt;). Digital Point claims that no gaming of the system has occurred so far. A google search turns up at least a &lt;a href=&quot;http://workboxers.com/google_adsense/adsense_revenue_sharing.php&quot;&gt;handful&lt;/a&gt; of &lt;a href=&quot;http://thesandtrap.com/forum/showthread.php?t=1485&quot;&gt;other&lt;/a&gt;  &lt;a href=&quot;http://archives.web-mastery.net/postt1039.html&quot;&gt;sites&lt;/a&gt; that are doing the same (but no major sites, it seems), and the latest &lt;a href=&quot;http://drupal.org/project/adsense&quot;&gt;drupal adsense module&lt;/a&gt; apparently makes it easy to set up. Curious. &lt;small&gt;[Full disclosure: I know nothing about any of this. I mean, I barely know what a &apos;blog is &lt;small&gt;(and I&apos;m sticking to that leading apostrophe -- &lt;small&gt;it&apos;s the only thing standing between us and Babelian anarchy &lt;small&gt;and we&apos;re not even sure &apos;Babelian&apos; is a legitimate word so now we&apos;re &lt;i&gt;really&lt;/i&gt; mired in the hypocrisy, huh?&lt;/small&gt;&lt;/small&gt;)&lt;/small&gt;.]&lt;/small&gt;</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">post:www.metafilter.com,2006:site.48302</guid>
		<pubDate>Mon, 16 Jan 2006 09:26:40 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>nobody</dc:creator>		<category>adsense</category>		<category>google</category>		<category>blogs</category>		<category>forums</category>
	</item>	<item>
		<title>By: menace303</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/48302/Community-Forums-Sharing-Ad-Revenue-with-Users#1174285</link>	
		<description>In a forum site setting, how can there &lt;i&gt;not&lt;/i&gt; be fraud when the visitor is also the person that would benefit from the adsense?</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:www.metafilter.com,2006:site.48302-1174285</guid>
		<pubDate>Mon, 16 Jan 2006 09:37:00 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>menace303</dc:creator>
	</item>	<item>
		<title>By: verb</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/48302/Community-Forums-Sharing-Ad-Revenue-with-Users#1174286</link>	
		<description>I think there&apos;s a bit of confusion. In the case of drupal&apos;s adsense module, it allows the person who posted a given article to receive a cut of the adsense revenue generated when people read said article. It&apos;s not that &lt;i&gt;visitors&lt;/i&gt; benefit so much as &lt;i&gt;writers&lt;/i&gt; have a chance to share in the site ad revenues.</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:www.metafilter.com,2006:site.48302-1174286</guid>
		<pubDate>Mon, 16 Jan 2006 09:40:25 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>verb</dc:creator>
	</item>	<item>
		<title>By: nobody</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/48302/Community-Forums-Sharing-Ad-Revenue-with-Users#1174298</link>	
		<description>Some clarification so you don&apos;t have to wade through all the links: The digitalpoint system is such that the initial poster of a thread gets 50% of the adsense revenue for that thread. The NYTimes article suggests that commenters within the thread get a share as well, but the digitalpoint FAQ seems to say that they get 50% of the revenue for incoming pageviews linked to their specific comment only. Apart probably from this last bit, I gathered from the drupal site that their module was doing the same.</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:www.metafilter.com,2006:site.48302-1174298</guid>
		<pubDate>Mon, 16 Jan 2006 09:48:37 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>nobody</dc:creator>
	</item>	<item>
		<title>By: blue_beetle</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/48302/Community-Forums-Sharing-Ad-Revenue-with-Users#1174323</link>	
		<description>How dare someone attempt to make money from doing something they love!</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:www.metafilter.com,2006:site.48302-1174323</guid>
		<pubDate>Mon, 16 Jan 2006 10:04:22 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>blue_beetle</dc:creator>
	</item>	<item>
		<title>By: jam_pony</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/48302/Community-Forums-Sharing-Ad-Revenue-with-Users#1174344</link>	
		<description>Make money by posting threads in fora? I would have to stop black-holing the Google scripts at the router.

Seriously, aside from allowing more monitoring of one&apos;s web activity, which only a few resist, the effect on the fora would be unfortunate.  It introduces an element of commercialism into the selection of topics, which would poison the honesty that many of us appreciate online boards for.

In the long run it might even give the advertisers a lever to influence content in their own ways too.

We&apos;re better off with the current indirect and uneasy relationship where site owners deal with the advertisers and participants deal with the content and there is only a loose relation between the two.</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:www.metafilter.com,2006:site.48302-1174344</guid>
		<pubDate>Mon, 16 Jan 2006 10:16:44 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>jam_pony</dc:creator>
	</item>	<item>
		<title>By: dhartung</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/48302/Community-Forums-Sharing-Ad-Revenue-with-Users#1174430</link>	
		<description>I can&apos;t &lt;i&gt;wait&lt;/i&gt; for all the mesothelioma threads.</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:www.metafilter.com,2006:site.48302-1174430</guid>
		<pubDate>Mon, 16 Jan 2006 10:56:23 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>dhartung</dc:creator>
	</item>	<item>
		<title>By: shmegegge</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/48302/Community-Forums-Sharing-Ad-Revenue-with-Users#1174528</link>	
		<description>I would just like to say that I adore the wording of this post.</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:www.metafilter.com,2006:site.48302-1174528</guid>
		<pubDate>Mon, 16 Jan 2006 11:45:48 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>shmegegge</dc:creator>
	</item>	<item>
		<title>By: nobody</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/48302/Community-Forums-Sharing-Ad-Revenue-with-Users#1175253</link>	
		<description>I would think that the bigger fear may be users on popular sites on this one linking to other sites&apos; threads or comments in which they have a revenue-sharing stake. It would certainly make self-linking harder to detect.</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:www.metafilter.com,2006:site.48302-1175253</guid>
		<pubDate>Mon, 16 Jan 2006 20:17:53 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>nobody</dc:creator>
	</item>	<item>
		<title>By: nobody</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/48302/Community-Forums-Sharing-Ad-Revenue-with-Users#1175277</link>	
		<description>(oops: &quot;...popular sites &lt;b&gt;like&lt;/b&gt; this one....&quot;)</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:www.metafilter.com,2006:site.48302-1175277</guid>
		<pubDate>Mon, 16 Jan 2006 20:59:48 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>nobody</dc:creator>
	</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
