information sharded
January 28, 2006 10:37 AM Subscribe
This post was deleted for the following reason: posted previously
Actually, this is pretty interesting. For those who didn't click the links because the poster didn't bother to explain what they are, both link to Google search results for Falun Gong--the first from the censored Google China site, and the second from the standard Google search. The differences are striking!
That said, this should have gone in the previous discussion of this issue. (And find the shift key already.)
posted by LarryC at 11:01 AM on January 28, 2006
That said, this should have gone in the previous discussion of this issue. (And find the shift key already.)
posted by LarryC at 11:01 AM on January 28, 2006
Based on the fundamental principles: truthfulness, ...
...beautifulness, relativityness.
posted by weapons-grade pandemonium at 11:01 AM on January 28, 2006
...beautifulness, relativityness.
posted by weapons-grade pandemonium at 11:01 AM on January 28, 2006
eesh. my bad. i did search, i guess i must have missed it.
posted by ginbiafra at 11:10 AM on January 28, 2006
posted by ginbiafra at 11:10 AM on January 28, 2006
Hey LarryC, i think the poster didn't explain it because it's totally obvious.
posted by wumpus at 11:14 AM on January 28, 2006
posted by wumpus at 11:14 AM on January 28, 2006
Interesting. I thought Google said that they'd indicate where items were sensored. Am I missing that bit?
posted by furtive at 11:20 AM on January 28, 2006
posted by furtive at 11:20 AM on January 28, 2006
Interesting. I thought Google said that they'd indicate where items were sensored. Am I missing that bit?
It's down at the bottom: 据当地法律法规和政策，部分搜索结果未予显示。
I'm not sure "pretty funny" is the first description of this that should spring to mind.
posted by flashboy at 11:41 AM on January 28, 2006
It's down at the bottom: 据当地法律法规和政策，部分搜索结果未予显示。
I'm not sure "pretty funny" is the first description of this that should spring to mind.
posted by flashboy at 11:41 AM on January 28, 2006
According to jiawen in the previous thread, which is what you should go and read when this one is deleted, it says:
In accordance with local laws, regulations and policies, part of these search results are not displayed.
posted by flashboy at 11:48 AM on January 28, 2006
In accordance with local laws, regulations and policies, part of these search results are not displayed.
posted by flashboy at 11:48 AM on January 28, 2006
According to the local law laws and regulations and the policy, the part searches the result not to demonstrate.
posted by DrJohnEvans at 11:51 AM on January 28, 2006
posted by DrJohnEvans at 11:51 AM on January 28, 2006
That was Babelfish, anyway.
posted by DrJohnEvans at 11:52 AM on January 28, 2006
posted by DrJohnEvans at 11:52 AM on January 28, 2006
Google's official blog posting on this topic is revealing.
posted by S.C. at 11:52 AM on January 28, 2006
posted by S.C. at 11:52 AM on January 28, 2006
This exact comparison was on the UK's 'Channel 4 News' the day that Google China launched.
posted by TheDonF at 12:13 PM on January 28, 2006
posted by TheDonF at 12:13 PM on January 28, 2006
The blog post spectifically mentions blocking search results to comply with local laws in France, Germany and the US. I know what France and Germany is referring to, but anyone know what the US laws are?
posted by jacquilynne at 2:47 PM on January 28, 2006
posted by jacquilynne at 2:47 PM on January 28, 2006
jacquilynne: Google will remove content pursuant to DMCA violation claims. (link)
posted by S.C. at 3:50 PM on January 28, 2006
posted by S.C. at 3:50 PM on January 28, 2006
« Older Ink That Stinks | Specialization is for Insects Newer »
This thread has been archived and is closed to new comments
posted by Rothko at 10:46 AM on January 28, 2006