<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
    xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
     xmlns:admin="http://webns.net/mvcb/"
     xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
     xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#">
	<channel> 

	<title>Comments on: Comments on 4946</title>
	<link>http://www.metafilter.com/4946//</link>
	<description>Comments on MetaFilter post Comments on 4946</description>
	<pubDate>Tue, 26 Dec 2000 21:04:48 -0800</pubDate>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 26 Dec 2000 21:04:48 -0800</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en-us</language>
	<docs>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/tech/rss</docs>
	<ttl>60</ttl>

	<item>
		<title>Post number 4946</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/4946/</link>	
		<description>&lt;a href="http://dailynews.yahoo.com/h/nm/20001226/re/people_robards_dc_2.html"&gt;Jason Robards passes away today - &lt;/a&gt; and seems to solidify the pop &lt;a href=&quot;http://members.aol.com/mtic/deathtrios99.html&quot;&gt;theory&lt;/a&gt; that famous people die in threes (or &lt;a href=&quot;http://hometown.psn.net/~xocxoc/math/glossary1.htm&quot;&gt;not&lt;/a&gt;.) &lt;p&gt;
 Jason joins recent departures &lt;a href=&quot;http://dailynews.yahoo.com/h/nm/20001223/re/borge_obituary_dc_1.html&quot;&gt;Victor Borge&lt;/a&gt; - died 12/23, and &lt;A href=&quot;http://dailynews.yahoo.com/h/eo/20001226/en/a_mini-obit_actor_billy_barty_1.html&quot;&gt;Billy Barty&lt;/a&gt; - died 12/23.</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">post:www.metafilter.com,2000:site.4946</guid>
		<pubDate>Tue, 26 Dec 2000 21:02:19 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>kokogiak</dc:creator>		<category>obituraries</category>		<category>jasonrobards</category>		<category>brokenlink</category>		<category>yahoo</category>		<category>victorborge</category>		<category>billybarty</category>
	</item>	<item>
		<title>By: gluechunk</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/4946/#36692</link>	
		<description>I made a post about his death &lt;a href=http://www.metafilter.com/comments.mefi/4943&gt;several hours ago&lt;/a&gt;.</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:www.metafilter.com,2000:site.4946-36692</guid>
		<pubDate>Tue, 26 Dec 2000 21:04:48 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>gluechunk</dc:creator>
	</item>	<item>
		<title>By: luke</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/4946/#36695</link>	
		<description>No, Gluechunk, you made a post about a character in &quot;Magnolia.&quot; How in the world would someone who has not seen the movie know what you were talking about?

I&apos;ve &lt;a href=&quot;http://metatalk.metafilter.com/metadetail.mefi/252&quot;&gt;ranted about this&lt;/a&gt; before in Metatalk. 

Oftentimes double posts happen because the original poster was unclear or too clever for her own good. &quot;Clever&quot; posts such as yours -- posts that tease, or that rely on outside knowledge or inside jokes -- require community members to click through every single link just in order to know what&apos;s been posted before. That&apos;s rude. We should expect good community members to keep up; we should not demand they click through every link.

But then it&apos;s even ruder to then smugly scold the second poster. 

In this case, yes, kokogiak re-posted old news, the difference being that in his post, one actually knows what it&apos;s about without having to click through (although I dispute the dopey &quot;celebrities die in threes&quot; theory, which is in this case and in all cases pure silliness).</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:www.metafilter.com,2000:site.4946-36695</guid>
		<pubDate>Tue, 26 Dec 2000 21:19:29 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>luke</dc:creator>
	</item>	<item>
		<title>By: DoublePostGuy</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/4946/#36696</link>	
		<description>Double Post! Double
Post! Double Post! Double Post!
Double Post! Ha ha!

&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.metafilter.com/comments.mefi/4943&quot;&gt;http://www.metafilter.com/comments.mefi/4943&lt;/a&gt;</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:www.metafilter.com,2000:site.4946-36696</guid>
		<pubDate>Tue, 26 Dec 2000 21:22:21 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>DoublePostGuy</dc:creator>
	</item>	<item>
		<title>By: lagado</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/4946/#36697</link>	
		<description>Come on you nitpickers!

This is not a double post at all because of its neat and intriguing theory about famous people dying in threes. 

Think about that for a moment...Threes!</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:www.metafilter.com,2000:site.4946-36697</guid>
		<pubDate>Tue, 26 Dec 2000 21:30:27 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>lagado</dc:creator>
	</item>	<item>
		<title>By: aaron</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/4946/#36698</link>	
		<description>&lt;i&gt;and Billy Barty - died 12/23.&lt;/i&gt;&lt;p&gt;Well, 2 1/2 anyway.&lt;p&gt;BTW, famous people will always &quot;die by threes&quot; as long as you&apos;re waiting to counting them by threes.</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:www.metafilter.com,2000:site.4946-36698</guid>
		<pubDate>Tue, 26 Dec 2000 21:33:37 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>aaron</dc:creator>
	</item>	<item>
		<title>By: gluechunk</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/4946/#36702</link>	
		<description>I will admit that my post about this subject was &quot;unclear&quot; - but I guess I prefer having *some* MeFi links be mysterious.  If I read something that I don&apos;t get, I don&apos;t feel like I&apos;m forced to click on the link - usually I hover over the link to see what it may be about.  I like a variety of different posting styles.

I&apos;m curious how others interact with MeFi.  Do you scan the new posts to just see if there&apos;s something that interests you?  Do you click through every link?  Do you read the comments for each post?  

And I apologize if it seemed that I was scolding this poster.  I was merely pointing out my earlier death flag. </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:www.metafilter.com,2000:site.4946-36702</guid>
		<pubDate>Tue, 26 Dec 2000 22:07:35 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>gluechunk</dc:creator>
	</item>	<item>
		<title>By: dhartung</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/4946/#36708</link>	
		<description>Those wishing to be too coy with their MeFi posting style may wish to consider ... &lt;i&gt;their own weblog!&lt;/i&gt;

Honestly -- the stuff I (occasionally) post here is only because I believe it&apos;ll generate good discussion. That&apos;s unlikely when few people click through. Coyness also works best for readers who already know your posting style or obsessions.

Very Meta.</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:www.metafilter.com,2000:site.4946-36708</guid>
		<pubDate>Tue, 26 Dec 2000 23:02:36 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>dhartung</dc:creator>
	</item>	<item>
		<title>By: jennyb</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/4946/#36733</link>	
		<description>&quot;But then it&apos;s even ruder to then smugly scold the second poster.&quot;

So what is it called when someone smugly scolds the first poster for smugly scolding the second poster?

Meta-scolding?</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:www.metafilter.com,2000:site.4946-36733</guid>
		<pubDate>Wed, 27 Dec 2000 05:04:34 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>jennyb</dc:creator>
	</item>	<item>
		<title>By: holgate</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/4946/#36739</link>	
		<description>And it also depends on your definition of famous people, which tends to extend to the D-list when you&apos;re looking for number three. (I&apos;d only heard of Victor Borge out of those three, for instance.)</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:www.metafilter.com,2000:site.4946-36739</guid>
		<pubDate>Wed, 27 Dec 2000 05:49:42 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>holgate</dc:creator>
	</item>	<item>
		<title>By: mimi</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/4946/#36748</link>	
		<description>Fours.
&lt;a href=&quot;http://us.imdb.com/Name?Klemperer,+Werner&quot;&gt;Werner Klemperer,&lt;/a&gt; &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.dynagirl.com/blog.html#12-15&quot;&gt; 3/22/20 - 12/6/2K.&lt;/a&gt;</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:www.metafilter.com,2000:site.4946-36748</guid>
		<pubDate>Wed, 27 Dec 2000 07:31:20 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>mimi</dc:creator>
	</item>	<item>
		<title>By: rcade</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/4946/#36750</link>	
		<description>&lt;i&gt;How in the world would someone who has not seen the movie know what you were talking about?&lt;/i&gt;

The URL had &quot;obit_robards&quot; in it. Admittedly that&apos;s not the biggest hint in the world, but the ability to read URLs is an important survival skill.</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:www.metafilter.com,2000:site.4946-36750</guid>
		<pubDate>Wed, 27 Dec 2000 07:41:58 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>rcade</dc:creator>
	</item>	<item>
		<title>By: kokogiak</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/4946/#36763</link>	
		<description>I have to admit scanning the most recent 5 or 6 posts before posting this, and didn&apos;t see anything on Robards - but after posting, I did notice (by mousing over and seeing the URL - I never saw Magnolia). Even though it was a double-post, I thought the two were different enough (a Magnolia-based epitaph, and a celebs-in-threes idea) that it didn&apos;t seem like a big deal.&lt;p&gt;
For the record, I think the death-trios theory is nonsense, but love it when pop theories get a little boost like this - I imagine people saying &quot;see - I told you so&quot; in a very knowing manner.&lt;p&gt;
Props to gluechunk for being first, but I don&apos;t generally turn to MeFi for breaking news. </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:www.metafilter.com,2000:site.4946-36763</guid>
		<pubDate>Wed, 27 Dec 2000 08:14:04 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>kokogiak</dc:creator>
	</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
