Comments on: "This One's For You, Walt!"

"This One's For You, Walt!"

maryh — Mon, 06 Mar 2006 12:27:44 -0800

Thomas Kinkade, Painter of LightTM, seeks to "to touch people of all faiths, to bring peace, and joy into their lives through the images he creates." Not all of his side ventures have been considered successful. But now the Christian-themed artist is accused of ruthless business tactics and seamy personal conduct, including drunkenly heckling Siegfried & Roy and, um, wantonly marking his territory. Perhaps Kinkade hopes to follow in the footsteps of Jack the Dripper?

By: orthogonality

orthogonality — Mon, 06 Mar 2006 12:33:16 -0800

"It's mainstream art, not art you have to look at to try to understand, or have an art degree to know whether it's good or not," said Mike Koligman, a longtime fan who with his wife owns Kinkade galleries in San Diego and Utah.

By: iamck

iamck — Mon, 06 Mar 2006 12:35:10 -0800

Art for blind people.

By: slatternus

slatternus — Mon, 06 Mar 2006 12:37:11 -0800

Thomas Kinkade's paintings make my stomach turn. A more perfect depiction of hell simply cannot be produced by the human hand. Or in Kinkade's instance, the hands of sweatshop laborers. He truly is the NIKE of the art world.

By: Astro Zombie

Astro Zombie — Mon, 06 Mar 2006 12:37:40 -0800

My girlfriend worked for a Thomas Kinkade gallery a few years ago. It was so mismanaged that she left it after a few months and filed two lawsuits against them. She already thought he was a bad painter -- she used to delight in showing me examples of Kinkade's poor understanding of perpective, but I was more fascinated by the fact that some of these cabins were glowing from inside during full daylight, suggesting they may actually be on fire. That being said, he inspires good parodies (via boingboing).

By: fandango_matt

fandango_matt — Mon, 06 Mar 2006 12:38:12 -0800

By: Navek Rednam

Navek Rednam — Mon, 06 Mar 2006 12:39:28 -0800

I nearly worked in a Kinkade gallery. As soon as I arrived for my interview I knew it wasn't for me. Luckiest escape ever. Although I'd probably be writing some entertaining anecdote about customers instead, if I had worked there.

By: loquacious

loquacious — Mon, 06 Mar 2006 12:39:49 -0800

Thomas Kinkade eats babies.

By: keswick

keswick — Mon, 06 Mar 2006 12:40:16 -0800

You know, as crappy as "his" paintings are, you gotta love anyone who pisses on Disney.

By: sourwookie

sourwookie — Mon, 06 Mar 2006 12:42:56 -0800

Drunkenly heckling Siegfried & Roy is a problem?

By: ernie

ernie — Mon, 06 Mar 2006 12:43:06 -0800

There's a TK gallery in one of the local towne squares. I've had fantasies of getting some awful precious moments stickers and remixing some of the prints a la colorforms.

By: unreason

unreason — Mon, 06 Mar 2006 12:44:20 -0800

I'd never heard of the marking the territory thing before, or anything about him being an asshole. But it has always mystified me how upset people get about his paintings. Yeah, they're overpriced. And they're certainly not fine art. but if people think they're pretty, and want to buy them, so what? It makes them happy, and it doesn't hurt anybody. It isn't like Kinkade is preventing people from appreciating art; it's not like the person who buys a Kinkade would be looking at good art if there was no Kinkade. Kinkade is art for people who don't like art. If people get some enjoyment out of his overpriced, kitchy paintings, let 'em. It isn't like he's forcing real artists to stop painting.

By: yonation

yonation — Mon, 06 Mar 2006 12:45:44 -0800

while i hate thomas kinkade, the idea of pissing on famous icons doesn't disagree with me at all... and i question the wisdom of liberal/leftists who hate his christian message to appreciate newspaper articles that highlight activity like that -- after all, we should be encouraging it more often! In general, many of these celebrate-that-your-enemy-has-fallen-by-embracing-his-tactic pieces reek of daily kosism and doesn't seem to further our causes a bit.

By: loquacious

loquacious — Mon, 06 Mar 2006 12:46:16 -0800

"'This is God-given talent,' Karen de la Carriere said of a favored print, "Sierra Evening Majesty," with its snowy peaks, red-gold skies and smoke wisping from a cabin chimney. 'He is a modern-day Leonardo da Vinci or Monet. There is no one in our generation who can paint like that.'" Now that's comedy. There are thousands and thousands of artists out there, both insider and outsider, formally trained or not, who are better painters then Kinkade. Walk into any decently advanced evening community college oil painting class and you'll find at least one deft (and possibly daft) old retiree that's been doing this longer then Kinkade, enjoying it more, and doing a better job at it. And this isn't even including the hundreds of thousands of professional artists and illustrators who could pull off Kinkade's tired, vanilla style but willfully choose not to. Get Kinkade and Wyland in a room and let me at 'em. I'll murderize 'em... with light! sound waves color repetitive beats light, sound waves, color

By: AndrewStephens

AndrewStephens — Mon, 06 Mar 2006 12:48:28 -0800

He is a terrible, terrible artist (and maybe a bad businessman), but most of the muck raked in the LA Times article seems pretty light. He cursed at a woman? Heaven forfend! He urinated on Winnie the Pooh? Who among us can't say that they have felt that urge? Feeling up a woman's breast is less excusable, but still pretty minor stuff even if it is true.

By: Astro Zombie

Astro Zombie — Mon, 06 Mar 2006 12:48:46 -0800

I don't hate Thomas Kinkade, and I wouldn't tell people not to buy his paintings, but he makes art for people who hate art.

By: loquacious

loquacious — Mon, 06 Mar 2006 12:49:34 -0800

And they're certainly not fine art. but if people think they're pretty, and want to buy them, so what? If only because there are literally thousands of talented, even "mainstream" artists that actually could use a slice of that pie in a way Kinkade could never appreciate. Me, I hate him 'cause he sucks. He even sucks at sucking. I wish for him to be eaten from the inside out by at least a thousand penis fish.

By: maryh

maryh — Mon, 06 Mar 2006 12:50:04 -0800

Well, sure, yonation, I suppose it's mean to mock the guy based soley on the content of his paintings, but it IS apparent that he was defrauding gallery owners. Which isn't nice.

By: MrMoonPie

MrMoonPie — Mon, 06 Mar 2006 12:57:20 -0800

So, I was working on telling my own story about browsing art galleries with a date, and how disappointed I was in said date's love of Kinkade. Like the relationship, the story didn't really work. However, I did come across the Kinkade Korner. Kooky.

By: brownpau

brownpau — Mon, 06 Mar 2006 12:57:31 -0800

Oh God. Thomas Kinkade was something of a joke in our Christian artists' group back in school. He was the epitome of campy, corny, crowd-pleasing kitsch, second only to Thomas Cole for sheer unashamed schlock. His art sits on the same level as today's Randian romantic realists, but with the taste of bourgeosie Christians rather than objectivists as his captive market.

By: empath

empath — Mon, 06 Mar 2006 12:59:06 -0800

Randian romantic realists I had no idea such a thing existed, and wish that I still didn't.

By: ernie

ernie — Mon, 06 Mar 2006 12:59:24 -0800

My art comes from people who hate people who make are for people who hate art. Over 90% does.

By: ernie

ernie — Mon, 06 Mar 2006 12:59:56 -0800

art damn

By: drstein

drstein — Mon, 06 Mar 2006 13:02:13 -0800

"Owners of ten of Thomas Kinkade's galleries across the country are suing Kinkade's company, claiming it has "saturated the market with Kinkade's works and sold them on QVC cable television, undercutting 'exclusive' galleries. Once devout followers of 'the painter of light,' now are saying that the business end of Kinkade's empire has a dark side. The Star-Tribune (Minneapolis) 08/18/02" (The link is now a 404, unfortunately) To hear that someone else is pissed off at the guy doesn't surprise me at all. And bleah on all of the "God touched me" shit.

By: petrilli

petrilli — Mon, 06 Mar 2006 13:07:37 -0800

Do we really need more reason to hate him than his paintings suck? The rest is just gilding the lily really.

By: mr_roboto

mr_roboto — Mon, 06 Mar 2006 13:08:22 -0800

brownpau writes "Randian romantic realists" There are not words for the sheer awesomeness of the painting you linked to there. Upon seeing it, something inside me changed.

By: Superfrankenstein

Superfrankenstein — Mon, 06 Mar 2006 13:09:32 -0800

Your La-Z-Boy link is priceless, maryh.

By: cmyk

cmyk — Mon, 06 Mar 2006 13:10:24 -0800

Kinkade was a standard punch line when I was going to art school. Anyone who trademarks himself as an Impressionist (or a camera; we never could agree on what he claimed he was) deserves mockery.

By: Faint of Butt

Faint of Butt — Mon, 06 Mar 2006 13:11:06 -0800

Empire? Dark Side? You know, if Thomas Kincaid painted a portrait of Darth Vader, I might buy it. (Or at least steal a low-res image off the Web and put it on my desktop.)

By: Hal Mumkin

Hal Mumkin — Mon, 06 Mar 2006 13:13:03 -0800

ernie, is that a Blur song?

By: empath

empath — Mon, 06 Mar 2006 13:15:30 -0800

I think it was a reference to "Taking drugs to make music to take drugs to"

By: yerfatma

yerfatma — Mon, 06 Mar 2006 13:16:21 -0800

I honor the man's every act. Without him, I wouldn't be able to torque off the designers at work with just two words. And Mayor Curley and I would have missed out on the joy of being pushed out of a gallery in the local mall for things like: "What the artist is trying to say here is: there's a house. On a mountain."

By: MikeMc

MikeMc — Mon, 06 Mar 2006 13:16:58 -0800

...he makes art for people who hate art. I'm not a TK fan but is he really any worse than some guy throwing a pile of dirt in a gallery corner and calling it "art" (or Jeff Koons putting three basketballs in an aquarium)? Maybe if TK canned some of his shit he would be considered a great artist?

By: Astro Zombie

Astro Zombie — Mon, 06 Mar 2006 13:20:15 -0800

There is a lot of bad art out there, but what you describe is much less popular than Kinkade.

By: slatternus

slatternus — Mon, 06 Mar 2006 13:22:14 -0800

if Thomas Kincaid painted a portrait of Darth Vader, I might buy it. Of course it would be Darth Vader standing in a field of flowers, lit by a suffused, directionless golden light, while in the distance, kites dance faery-like around a charming rustic lighthouse. Actually, I'd buy that.

By: jonmc

jonmc — Mon, 06 Mar 2006 13:22:23 -0800

well, the can of shit was actually a pretty canny (pun intended) comment on posery and BS in the artworld. As for Kinkade, I was unaware of his existence. I'm not a huge fan of his art (although I kind of understand the sentiment behind "you don't need a degree to get it"), but aren't artists supposed to be crazy? would you trust one that wasn't?

By: ParisParamus

ParisParamus — Mon, 06 Mar 2006 13:24:56 -0800

Oh, the horror. THE HORREUR! I can think of no one who better symobolizes the American I fear. And yes, me suspects that most of this businessman's products are attached to walls in Red State homes...

By: hototogisu

hototogisu — Mon, 06 Mar 2006 13:25:42 -0800

The idea that Mayor Curley could be in real life anything like what he is here is a beautiful one, yerfatma...

By: brownpau

brownpau — Mon, 06 Mar 2006 13:26:40 -0800

slatternus - Is this close enough for you?

By: loquacious

loquacious — Mon, 06 Mar 2006 13:31:29 -0800

THOMAS KINKADE = SHIT MEAN KODAK

By: slatternus

slatternus — Mon, 06 Mar 2006 13:39:00 -0800

brownpau: AWESOME. The delicacy of form, the magical quality of the light. It's as though the master hand of Thomas Kinkade himself brushed ever so obliquely across the canvas, transforming it's coarse earthly weave into a radiant vision of luminous spirituality! How much?

By: jonmc

jonmc — Mon, 06 Mar 2006 13:41:23 -0800

I just looked at some of Kinkade's stuff. Seems to be a Norman Rockwell wannabe without any of the charm.

By: scatman

scatman — Mon, 06 Mar 2006 13:43:05 -0800

Thomas Kinkade, Painter Of Shite. Yonation, "daily kos-ism?" Puh-leez. The revelations are satisfying because they illuminate the hypocrisy of everything that is modern conservatism: fatuous, angels-and-puppies tripe thinly masking something grotesque, and often evil. My personal appreciation for this article doesn't stem from any schadenfreude; it's just satisfaction that another opportunistic peddler of "wholesomeness" is exposed for what he truly is.

By: malocchio

malocchio — Mon, 06 Mar 2006 13:43:33 -0800

And so when the show started, Thom just started yelling, 'Codpiece, codpiece...' I have newfound respect for the painter of tripe. Well, not really, but it did make me laugh.

By: squalor

squalor — Mon, 06 Mar 2006 13:44:56 -0800

Kinkade Remixed! Courtesy of Something Awful's Photoshop Phriday.

By: brownpau

brownpau — Mon, 06 Mar 2006 13:46:13 -0800

I couldn't resist. Protected as parody under fair use law.

By: trey

trey — Mon, 06 Mar 2006 13:46:15 -0800

Where are all the people piping up to say "If you don't like his paintings that's fine, but don't bitch about it" or "You only hate them because they're popular" or "His paintings don't suck, they're just not your cup of tea!" The fact that we aren't seeing people say these things in this thread is testament to a point I tried to make in the Cory Doctorow thread -- sometimes popular things suck and not just because they're popular!

By: nixerman

nixerman — Mon, 06 Mar 2006 13:47:30 -0800

I like Kinkade. I really do. If it weren't for Kinkade and few other artists the entire art world would be lost. It's only because of him and his courageous art that we can still talk about bad taste in art. I wish more artists had the courage to man the wall alongside him.

By: ernie

ernie — Mon, 06 Mar 2006 13:52:27 -0800

The fact that we aren't seeing people say these things in this thread is testament to a point I tried to make in the Cory Doctorow thread -- sometimes popular things suck and not just because they're popular! Id say 1/3 of Cory's posts are still awesome though, where 0 of TKs works interest me. Just sayin'

By: cell divide

cell divide — Mon, 06 Mar 2006 13:58:15 -0800

"I think it was Roy or Siegfried or whatever had a codpiece in his leotards," Dandois testified. "And so when the show started, Thom just started yelling, 'Codpiece, codpiece,' and had to be quieted by his mother and Nanette." Great stuff. I love articles like this.

By: HTuttle

HTuttle — Mon, 06 Mar 2006 13:58:55 -0800

"This one's for you, Walt," the artist quipped late one night as he urinated on a Winnie the Pooh figure, See, at least he's not ALL bad.

By: slatternus

slatternus — Mon, 06 Mar 2006 14:01:18 -0800

actually, my couch is dusty rose. Could Darth Vader be wearing a dusty rose cape?

By: HTuttle

HTuttle — Mon, 06 Mar 2006 14:01:26 -0800

And I suppose he lifted sofa-art up a notch from black-velvet-Elvis and pool playing poodles.

By: Astro Zombie

Astro Zombie — Mon, 06 Mar 2006 14:10:20 -0800

Now, wait a second. Don't malign black-velvet paitings of Elvis.

By: Patty Lynn

Patty Lynn — Mon, 06 Mar 2006 14:14:11 -0800

This is what the world needs. Uplifting and inspirational art. I find it very refreshing. Art that celbrates life for a change instead of garbage being represented as art. www.cordair.com

By: R. Mutt

R. Mutt — Mon, 06 Mar 2006 14:20:57 -0800

Aw, I say give the People what they want .... Beanie Babies, Thomas Kinkade, Hummers, seasonal holiday decorative house flags, QVC, and big ugly McMansions ... it keeps the folks busy.

By: loquacious

loquacious — Mon, 06 Mar 2006 14:22:58 -0800

Uh oh. This'll go well.

By: dlanznar

dlanznar — Mon, 06 Mar 2006 14:23:34 -0800

Zippy's take on the matter...

By: brownpau

brownpau — Mon, 06 Mar 2006 14:24:02 -0800

Yes, especially since Quent Cordair was already linked above as a specific example of garbage being represented as art. Few things are funnier than earnest objectivist art spam.

By: R. Mutt

R. Mutt — Mon, 06 Mar 2006 14:24:03 -0800

Of course, maybe its just best to think of the whole Kinkade enterprise as "Found Performance Art".

By: crunchland

crunchland — Mon, 06 Mar 2006 14:24:51 -0800

Kinkade pictures aren't my taste. I also don't go to those all-you-can-eat buffet places or even the international pancake houses. But there are people who do. And it's their money.. the fact that the guy is in the business to make money, well, hell. Andy Warhol had people piss on copper plates, and he sold the results for millions. How is that any different?

By: beaucoupkevin

beaucoupkevin — Mon, 06 Mar 2006 14:27:09 -0800

At least Ha Wu Shen's got some boobs (NSFW) on that Cordair site. Kinkade would probably drop a cottage in her pubic area.

By: beaucoupkevin

beaucoupkevin — Mon, 06 Mar 2006 14:27:36 -0800

HAN Wu Shen. My apologies.

By: MrMoonPie

MrMoonPie — Mon, 06 Mar 2006 14:28:19 -0800

instead of garbage being represented as art

Here you go, Patty. Todd Lokken

By: Astro Zombie

Astro Zombie — Mon, 06 Mar 2006 14:29:39 -0800

Yowza! I'd drop a cottage in her pubic area!

By: illiad

illiad — Mon, 06 Mar 2006 14:35:05 -0800

By: trey

trey — Mon, 06 Mar 2006 14:35:28 -0800

My post seems to have been prophetic.

By: Patty Lynn

Patty Lynn — Mon, 06 Mar 2006 14:43:38 -0800

My point exactly. I would much rather have a work of art in my home that doesn't reek of dead fish and sour milk. Be it a beautiful woman or a beautiful skyscaper, I prefer surrounding myself with that which I value most. To each his own.

By: deanc

deanc — Mon, 06 Mar 2006 14:50:07 -0800

His art sits on the same level as today's Randian romantic realists, On some level, I totally understand the appeal of the works that appear in the link. However, I have terrible, terrible taste in art. At the same time, the art of the "Randian romantic realists" looks like something that would appear on the walls of a cult's headquarters. Or the walls of the place where all the people live in apparent perfect harmony and peace with each other with infinite access to whatever pleasures they desire, until one of them (almost invariably a sexy blond man between the ages of 20 and 30) discovers that the entire world in which they live is a ruse to keep them compliant and under control until the time at which they are dissected/recycled/killed/turned into food.

By: MrMoonPie

MrMoonPie — Mon, 06 Mar 2006 14:52:05 -0800

I prefer surrounding myself with that which I value most.

That's why I get all my art here.

By: Patty Lynn

Patty Lynn — Mon, 06 Mar 2006 14:58:36 -0800

Now that's cool! Thanks for the link.

By: spock

spock — Mon, 06 Mar 2006 15:05:59 -0800

For me he has always seemed the kind of artist that appeals to people who buy painted hand saws.

By: maryh

maryh — Mon, 06 Mar 2006 15:09:29 -0800

Kincaid's not for me, but heckfire people, why bitch about something you can't change? Ignoring the tripe is better than spewing bile over it. He's worth millions of dollars. Does he deserve this? The market says so. posted by illiad at 2:35 PM PST on March 6 [!] There have been lots of artists who made lots of money from thier work, and the various gimcracks & gewgawgery their work inspired. Charles Schultz and Jim Davis of Garfield fame come to mind, but there are plenty of others who sucessfully built brands around their illustrations/cartoons/whatever. My gripe with Kinkade (besides his utter crapulence) is that he's also selling himself as a Christian Personality & Businessman. His Christianity appears to have convinced some of the scammed gallery owners that he was worthy of their trust, yet he clearly didn't behave in a way consistent with his stated beliefs. The people bringing the lawsuits have lost their livelyhoods; for them it's not a simple value judgment about the man's painting style. He's a hypocrite and a dishonest businessman and no, he doesn't deserve his millions.

By: Astro Zombie

Astro Zombie — Mon, 06 Mar 2006 15:09:52 -0800

Oh my God. Please stop comparing Thonas Kinkade to awe-inpiring works of folk art.

By: Durhey

Durhey — Mon, 06 Mar 2006 15:20:57 -0800

My girlfriend is in the process of doing her art history master's thesis on kitsch, and Thomas Kinkade/Jeff Koons in particular. The difference between the two being that Kinkade "means it" genuinely and Koons probably "means it" ironically. She's currently considering what these revelations mean in the context of her thesis. Anyhow, as part of her research, we went to one of his lecture/auctions. He told us tales of baking lots of extra cookies with his family on Christmas Eve and taking them to nearby retirement homes. He asked a young boy up on stage and drew a sketch for him, telling him "One day, you can show this to your grandchildren and tell them how you met Thomas Kinkade". The auction was punctuated by a prayer session led by the man himself. At the time, I remember thinking this guy seemed like such an icon of piety that there had to be more to the story. His family was all present, and Kinkade's daughter signed my gf's Kinkade catalog with a picture of a unicorn. IMHO, if he takes all this in stride and goes right on painting, he'll have truly set himself amongst the great masters. I mean, which great masters haven't been heavy drinkers/gropers?

By: PinkStainlessTail

PinkStainlessTail — Mon, 06 Mar 2006 15:21:13 -0800

Does Cordair still sell that picture of Leonard Peikoff doing a wee on Nathaniel Branden? I always thought that was kinda crass.

By: Crosius

Crosius — Mon, 06 Mar 2006 15:24:35 -0800

It's a proud tradition. If you're not a good artist, you play at being an outrageous personality, so that people will look at you and say: "Look at how he confronts social convention! He must be a tortured soul! All great artists were tortured souls. He's a great artist!" Meanwhile, you scream obscenities all the way to the bank, and you get to tell the people who buy your crappy art that you hate them, which they interpret as a, "Satiric commentary on the modern dissolution of the social contract." You die raving and dissolute, after burning your studio to the ground in a drunken fit of pique. The gallery owner gets very very rich after your funeral, because as bad as your art is, now it's scarce!

By: Decani

Decani — Mon, 06 Mar 2006 16:41:02 -0800

Thomas Kincade: art for people who don't like art. Nice landscapes, Kincade. My mum would love 'em. *Snork*.

By: Decani

Decani — Mon, 06 Mar 2006 16:42:13 -0800

By the way, I misspelled "Kinkade" deliberately. I felt he deserved that much.

By: Afroblanco

Afroblanco — Mon, 06 Mar 2006 16:55:02 -0800

Thomas Kinkade's work looks like it should be sold in a gas station somewhere along I-70, right next to the plasticene dragons and wooden cut-out snowmen.

By: Afroblanco

Afroblanco — Mon, 06 Mar 2006 16:59:23 -0800

Also, does anybody else find it amusing that his initials form the international graphics designer's symbol for "nothing here yet?" I'm just waiting for his protege, Lorem Ipsum, to come along.

By: gesamtkunstwerk

gesamtkunstwerk — Mon, 06 Mar 2006 17:04:20 -0800

Isn't Renoir the painter of light? You'd think his estate could do something about this... Kincaid is not just kitsch, it's something worse, something more incidious. It's art for people who want to escape into Candyland. I can't help but think it's bad for them. Wasn't that the name of the protagonist in Bridges of Madison County? Talk about crap walking hand in hand. As for ignoring tripe: Laughing in Kincaide is one of the joys of my daily commute. I don't let him bother me, but I do enjoy ridiculing the saps who buy his crap. Yes, there really is such a thing as objectively bad taste.

By: Secret Life of Gravy

Secret Life of Gravy — Mon, 06 Mar 2006 17:22:03 -0800

Many years ago when his art first came to national attention, I saw a few of his paintings hanging in an art gallery window on my daily walk. A tad cartoony, but I didn't actually loathe it with every fiber of my being. The problem is that there is no escaping the crap now-- every window of every shopping mall gallery and every craft shop and every gift catalog. It is being thrust under my nose so violently and so often there is no escape. Precious moments and cabbage patch dolls and rainbow crystal unicorns affect me the same way but they aren't hyped with such vigilance. I expect to see Thomas Kincaide clothes pretty soon and Thomas Kincaide cookies and Thomas Kincaide furniture and Thomas Kincaide movies and Thomas Kincaide burial caskets.

By: BoringPostcards

BoringPostcards — Mon, 06 Mar 2006 17:49:52 -0800

And Thomas Kinkade subdivisions.

By: mr_crash_davis

mr_crash_davis — Mon, 06 Mar 2006 18:17:53 -0800

"Drunkenly heckling Siegfried & Roy is a problem?" Yeah, I thought what happens in Vegas stays in Vegas.

By: maryh

maryh — Mon, 06 Mar 2006 18:38:16 -0800

Oh, you will, Secret Life of Gravy, you will... Unlike no self-labeled fine artist before him, Thomas Kinkade has taken to the public markets with zeal. The status of Media Arts Group allows a front seat view of the mass-produced lifestyle artist. "The mission of Media Arts Group, Inc. is to create the preeminent visual content management company in the world and to change the way people look at art through the development of life-affirming, emotionally uplifting images, and message driven products, rooted in traditional family values. With our successful business model, Media Arts Group, Inc. is positioned to be the dominant force in art publishing, home decor, and gift products in the coming century." [5]

By: loquacious

loquacious — Mon, 06 Mar 2006 18:49:18 -0800

And Thomas Kinkade subdivisions. OK, now that is terribly, terribly frightening. I think I'm going to be sick.

By: ParisParamus

ParisParamus — Mon, 06 Mar 2006 19:16:26 -0800

""The mission of Media Arts Group, Inc. is to create the preeminent visual content management company in the world and to change the way people look at art through the development of life-affirming, emotionally uplifting images, and message driven products, rooted in traditional family values. With our successful business model, Media Arts Group, Inc. is positioned to be the dominant force in art publishing, home decor, and gift products in the coming century." Fuck off.

By: crunchland

crunchland — Mon, 06 Mar 2006 19:21:28 -0800

Someone needs to provide artwork to hang on the walls of all the rooms in all the Holiday Inns across this great land of ours.

By: dbiedny

dbiedny — Mon, 06 Mar 2006 19:24:06 -0800

Paris, every now and then you post something on MeFi which makes me think there's a thoughtful being in that otherwise confused world called your thoughts. Your 2 word opinion regarding that mission statement is just perfect. Thnx.

By: HTuttle

HTuttle — Mon, 06 Mar 2006 19:26:01 -0800

It's art for people who want to escape into Candyland. I though Kenny Scharf had the corner on that market?

By: HTuttle

HTuttle — Mon, 06 Mar 2006 19:34:15 -0800

Also, does anybody else find it amusing that his initials form the international graphics designer's symbol for "nothing here yet?" Funny that. An aside: I always assumed that TK began as T/C with the slash cutting across most of the image space and T-C being short for ToCome. Years of being done more and more casually led the slash to be shorter and looking more like TK. Now most write TK. Old timers I've seen wrote T/C Could be convinced otherwise though

By: pyramid termite

pyramid termite — Mon, 06 Mar 2006 20:45:46 -0800

i love hipsters and their self-congratulatory loathing of what the masses like ... just remember that the majority of the contemporaries you hold dear will probably be forgotten in 100 years kinkade will be remembered ... not respected, but remembered

By: cribcage

cribcage — Mon, 06 Mar 2006 21:36:19 -0800

No Thomas Kinkade thread should exist without a link to the transcript of his 60 Minutes segment.

By: pyramid termite

pyramid termite — Mon, 06 Mar 2006 22:33:20 -0800

How does Kinkade regard Picasso? "I don't believe, in time, that he will be regarded as the titan that he is now," says Kinkade. "He is a man of great talent who, to me, used it to create three Picassos before breakfast because he could get $10,000 each for them." oh, geez ... i take it back ... he IS loathsome

By: slatternus

slatternus — Mon, 06 Mar 2006 22:53:32 -0800

just remember that the majority of the contemporaries you hold dear will probably be forgotten in 100 years Why should my sense of esthetic judgement be in the slightest degree influenced by what the masses like, and what may or may not be remembered in 100 years? The masses and their collective memory can go to hell.

By: sonofsamiam

sonofsamiam — Tue, 07 Mar 2006 03:48:15 -0800

spock: I have multiple relatives with painted saws on their walls, on both sides of the family. Also, painted milk jars and driftwood. Don't remember any Kinkades, though. The Kinkade outlet around here is in one of the richest neighborhoods in the country, a bleak land of parking lots and franchises.

By: jack_mo

jack_mo — Tue, 07 Mar 2006 05:33:23 -0800

Patty Lynn said 'To each his own.' No. There is good art, and there is bad art. If you value Kinkade, or the horrors you linked to, genuinely, rather than as kitsch, I honestly believe that you are not wholly human.

By: pyramid termite

pyramid termite — Tue, 07 Mar 2006 06:34:59 -0800

Why should my sense of esthetic judgement be in the slightest degree influenced by what the masses like, and what may or may not be remembered in 100 years? it's not esthetic judgement i'm concerned about ... it's the sense of personal superiority that some have expressed

By: ParisParamus

ParisParamus — Tue, 07 Mar 2006 06:57:56 -0800

No, what matters is having to run into his sheis involuntarily, in too many places. And what it indicates and portends for American society: that many people's judgment is so perverted, so vapid that this product is popular. I can't help but think of TK sheis in the same breath as Scientology, the Mormons, and other bizarre, scary cults.

By: Secret Life of Gravy

Secret Life of Gravy — Tue, 07 Mar 2006 07:42:39 -0800

Don't remember any Kinkades, though. The Kinkade outlet around here is in one of the richest neighborhoods in the country, a bleak land of parking lots and franchises. posted by sonofsamiam at 6:48 AM EST on March 7 On the other hand, my husband's high school drop-out, children of share croppers, fundamental Baptist, trailer park-living family looooooves them some Kincaide. Mother-in-Law's perfect Christmas present is a resin-cast lighthouse light and water fountain "inspired" by T K.

By: Mitheral

Mitheral — Tue, 07 Mar 2006 07:52:20 -0800

spock writes "For me he has always seemed the kind of artist that appeals to people who buy painted hand saws." I love these people. Take a nice old working tool, paint it up nice and hang it on a wall protected from the elements. Thereby preserving the tool for the next generation who can buy it for 50 cents at a yard sale, sharpen it and be good to go.

By: Astro Zombie

Astro Zombie — Tue, 07 Mar 2006 08:43:32 -0800

No. There is good art, and there is bad art. If you value Kinkade, or the horrors you linked to, genuinely, rather than as kitsch, I honestly believe that you are not wholly human. While I think this is an overstatement, I agree with the general sentiment. You can't simply argue that Kinkade is generally equal to all other artists, who are all generally equal to everybody ele, and art is all just a matter of taste. Kinkade is legitimate incompetent at fundamental elements of art. As I mentioned earlier, he can't draw perspective. For someone obsessed with light, he doesn't seem to understand the sourcing of light in a painting -- things just glow, and glow with an inhuman intensity that doesn't suggest godliness, but radioactivity. His cottages are architectual monstrosities. Because he is not a plein air painter, his rural scenes no longer resemble actual rural scenes, as he just seems to be inventing trees and creeks and brambles, without any sense of what trees and creeks and brambles might actually exist in any real place. And I know he's not trying to represent reality, but what he is creating is so divorced from reality as to suggest that he thinks that the real world is disgusting. He doesn't simply seem to be trying to improve nature in his painting, he's completely reinvented it, like a man who has only heard nature described and is trying to reproduce those descriptions in a darkened room. Objectively, his art is mediocre. It lacks skill and craft. That's no more a matter of tatse than it would be if I compared, say, one of those dismal poems goths put on their Web pages to the work of William Blake. Blake is objectively better. Poeple who can't realize this have no part discussing art.

By: applemeat

applemeat — Tue, 07 Mar 2006 09:35:33 -0800

I am with the (pretty predictable) consensus here on TK's gawd-awful art. But what freaks me out the most about his paintings is this: The way he paints cottages and houses to look as if there is warm, homey, welcoming hearth light inside of them makes it look instead as if a raging bonfire is devouring the building! Every time I see a TK painting (which, granted, is not often as I live in a major city--in a Blue state) I am struck by a twinge of peril--expecting the little cottage windows to come crashing out, obliterating everything in a massive fireball. The "Call 911!" effect of TK's glowing dwellings reminds me of that little 1950's "Christmas town" decoration my grandparents had under their tree. (Remember that town of houses that skirted the mirror "lake" on fluffy fabric "snow"?) A string of little tin houses, each with a 15watt bulb inside and hot enough to burn little fingers. ...Good times!

By: Astro Zombie

Astro Zombie — Tue, 07 Mar 2006 11:55:28 -0800

Oh, if you look, I'm sure you'll be able to find some Kinkade within driving distance, applemeat. He's ubiquitous.

By: ParisParamus

ParisParamus — Tue, 07 Mar 2006 12:13:35 -0800

Astro Zombie, that reminds my of the Palisades Mall, the hellish megamall in Rockland County, ~30 mins north of NYC. My county of youth has likely been TK'd more than I want to admit.

By: applemeat

applemeat — Tue, 07 Mar 2006 12:34:31 -0800

Yikes Astro Zombie, you're right. (...Ahhh, all the makings for a dream date: A stroll through the TK Gallery, a Hugh Grant movie, and then dinner at Chi-Chi's!) And I know he's not trying to represent reality, but what he is creating is so divorced from reality as to suggest that he thinks that the real world is disgusting. I've suspected this too while looking at TK's fantastic (dictionary sense) grotesques--the bulbous Smurf-village cottages, the explosions of light, the epidemic of wildflowers choking every square inch of foreground, etc.--although I could not articulate it as well as you just did.

By: ParisParamus

ParisParamus — Tue, 07 Mar 2006 12:40:56 -0800

I'd like to see some TK represented on ytmnd.com. It could be funny, and piss off the right people. BrownPau, can you help me?

By: Decani

Decani — Thu, 09 Mar 2006 18:32:48 -0800

kinkade will be remembered ... not respected, but remembered Sorta like Hitler, then. OMFG GODWIN OHNO!

By: malocchio

malocchio — Fri, 10 Mar 2006 09:57:13 -0800

An update to the LA Times article.

By: maryh

maryh — Fri, 10 Mar 2006 21:02:27 -0800

Apology accepted, Tom. Now you get right back on course with makin' your visual content management company the most preemminent in the world, y'hear?