
Four trained tasters compared the unadorned vanilla and chocolate at Cold Stone with those at Häagen-Dazs, Ben & Jerry’s, and Baskin-Robbins. They also sampled some Cold Stone concoctions.And those Quick Ratings (I won't reproduce the table, but the numbers are price and serving size in ounces):
What we found
The sum of a Cold Stone creation was better than its parts. Tasted plain, the chain’s vanilla and chocolate ice creams were definitely not as good as those from Häagen-Dazs or Ben & Jerry’s, and not quite as good as those from Baskin-Robbins. Cold Stone’s ice cream was gummy and fairly mild-flavored. Häagen-Dazs and Ben & Jerry’s ice creams were creamier, with higher-quality flavors. The Quick Ratings, below, gives the details.
With mix-ins, Cold Stone’s taste improved dramatically. Freshly added fruit and nuts masked defects in texture and added complexity.
The bottom line
Skip Cold Stone if you don’t want mix-ins. If you want good-tasting unadorned ice cream, you’ll be better off at Häagen-Dazs or Ben & Jerry’s, as the Quick Ratings show.
Excellentposted by staggernation at 4:09 PM on April 25, 2006
Häagen-Dazs
$2.45 3.7
Creamy, smooth, and dense, with big vanilla or chocolate flavor. Vanilla has a slight egginess.
Ben & Jerry’s
2.65 4
Balanced flavors, with a distinct full-fat dairy taste.
Very good
Baskin-Robbins
2.25 4
Slightly gummy vanilla, with generic vanilla flavoring. Chocolate has a big cocoa flavor but is chalky and slightly gummy.
Good
Cold Stone Creamery
3.55 6
Vanilla and chocolate are gummy, with a mild, generic flavor.
« Older Where do your recycleables go?... | I can't think for you. You'll ... Newer »
This thread has been archived and is closed to new comments
posted by mr_roboto at 11:30 AM on April 25, 2006