This is incredibly good news (and I mean it's hard to believe, both that it would have actually happened -- and that it will ultimately mean something). The Maoists have a point -- as long as Nepal remains under one of the few remaining absolute monarchies, constitutional democracy remains a gift that the King can whisk away at a whim.
The dissolution of Parliament was the real "historic mistake", because Gyanendra didn't see that this would give all political parties a reason to oppose him and make common cause with the rebels. The "shoot-to-kill" policy against the demonstrators was a grim marker of desperation, and I feared it could only mean a worsening of the regime -- but it appears that this may have had some internal, unseen effect, such as dividing the military against the King. posted by dhartung at 12:12 PM on April 27, 2006
The problem is that the king is in control of the army; the coming Constituent Assembly, through the sheer force of things, is basically going to have to either take away all of his powers or actually create a republic. So the conflict's on hold for now, but it actually has some pretty classic revolutionary overtones, the kind you don't see much today... posted by graymouser at 3:32 PM on April 27, 2006
« Older Yo La Tengo is Murdering the Classics... | Google Releases Sketchup for A... Newer »
This thread has been archived and is closed to new comments
posted by russilwvong at 11:24 AM on April 27, 2006