the perfect antihero by almost any definition. He is the individual who is isolated from society and who has no concern for it. He is the one creature without goals for himself or others. He is a menace to society without being its enemy, and he brings disaster to others without any malevolence. He is the rule breaker par excellence: He mocks religious rituals, scorns the proper way to do anything from cooking to war, has sex with his grandmother, and betrays all trusts...Trickster is the breaker of taboos, and it does not take full Freudian analysis to see in that fact the source of his humor. Thre is something simultaneously horrifying and satisfying about his breaking the rules all humans in society chafe at. He does, it has been observed, what everyone would like to do, but cannot, because of fear, reason, or virtue. Trickster is the ultimate poor role model for living in community, and thus the opposite of hero."So there would be no reason to expect the trickster/antihero to be any less universal than the hero. When the trickster's character varies, that is because the social norms of each culture vary, and the trickster character is shaped in opposition to local social norms.
« Older Exporting green and leafy water.... | Paris to Kabul. They won't b... Newer »
This thread has been archived and is closed to new comments
posted by skallas at 9:18 PM on April 29, 2006