Guns linked to testosterone
May 9, 2006 8:45 PM Subscribe
Study shows that just handling a gun increases testosterone levels in men.
Well, that's a surprise.
The hot sauce bit is interesting, though. The article is frustratingly oblique. What was this supposed to demonstrate? Maybe they liked hot sauce and handling guns made them feel generous.
Here's the NYT article cited in the UPI piece. The journal listed here as the venue for this research doesn't list any such article on Blackwell's site. Perhaps it's forthcoming?
posted by IshmaelGraves at 9:03 PM on May 9, 2006
The hot sauce bit is interesting, though. The article is frustratingly oblique. What was this supposed to demonstrate? Maybe they liked hot sauce and handling guns made them feel generous.
Here's the NYT article cited in the UPI piece. The journal listed here as the venue for this research doesn't list any such article on Blackwell's site. Perhaps it's forthcoming?
posted by IshmaelGraves at 9:03 PM on May 9, 2006
Eponysterical!
posted by loquacious at 9:05 PM on May 9, 2006
posted by loquacious at 9:05 PM on May 9, 2006
The paper's name is "Guns, Testosterone, and Aggression" but I havn't been able to find an online link, so I have no idea what they controled for or compared against.
I wonder if they tried a dangerous task - like say catching 10 scorpions in a large cage and placing them in smaller cages - if this would raise testosterone.
It may just be that guns are protypically dangerous. Danger raises testosterone. And testosterone raises aggression (upping the got sauce for strangers).
posted by MonkeySaltedNuts at 9:06 PM on May 9, 2006
I wonder if they tried a dangerous task - like say catching 10 scorpions in a large cage and placing them in smaller cages - if this would raise testosterone.
It may just be that guns are protypically dangerous. Danger raises testosterone. And testosterone raises aggression (upping the got sauce for strangers).
posted by MonkeySaltedNuts at 9:06 PM on May 9, 2006
Fight or flight. Danger, Will Robinson!
posted by longsleeves at 9:09 PM on May 9, 2006
posted by longsleeves at 9:09 PM on May 9, 2006
I found this study on caffeine and markmanship on pubmed, the abstract says they also measured testosterone, but not the results.
posted by 445supermag at 9:12 PM on May 9, 2006
posted by 445supermag at 9:12 PM on May 9, 2006
The paper should be published in the July 2006 issue of Psychological Science, I believe.
posted by iceberg273 at 9:23 PM on May 9, 2006
posted by iceberg273 at 9:23 PM on May 9, 2006
This thread is so ripe for innuendo I don't know where to start!
posted by Anonymous at 9:23 PM on May 9, 2006
posted by Anonymous at 9:23 PM on May 9, 2006
Barney drinks.
"Hey! Where's my inflated sense of self-esteem?"
He fishes around in his pockets, and pulls out his gun.
"Aaah. THERE'S my inflated sense of self-esteem."
posted by scaryblackdeath at 9:30 PM on May 9, 2006
"Hey! Where's my inflated sense of self-esteem?"
He fishes around in his pockets, and pulls out his gun.
"Aaah. THERE'S my inflated sense of self-esteem."
posted by scaryblackdeath at 9:30 PM on May 9, 2006
This thread is so ripe for innuendo I don't know where to start!
Shoot first, old son.
posted by loquacious at 9:32 PM on May 9, 2006
Shoot first, old son.
posted by loquacious at 9:32 PM on May 9, 2006
Very interesting. This is one of those studies where cause and effect arguments can get truly tied into knots.
Would be interesting to find out about the familiarity level with guns of the participants in both groups prior to the test, and setup a second set of experiments that test for a second variable based upon that.
Namely, use four groups - one group with little firearms background with Mousetrap, a second with little firearms background handling the guns, a third with extensive firearms background with Mousetrap, and a fourth with extensive firearms background handling the guns.
Is there a relationship between firearms familiarity and general aggression regardless of the circumstances as tested with the hot sauce? Do people who are experienced with firearms experience a diminished testosterone increase, (do they have a higher baseline to begin with?) or perhaps an enhanced one (anticipation)? It seems like you could answer a ton of questions by checking for that second variable.
posted by Ryvar at 9:33 PM on May 9, 2006
Would be interesting to find out about the familiarity level with guns of the participants in both groups prior to the test, and setup a second set of experiments that test for a second variable based upon that.
Namely, use four groups - one group with little firearms background with Mousetrap, a second with little firearms background handling the guns, a third with extensive firearms background with Mousetrap, and a fourth with extensive firearms background handling the guns.
Is there a relationship between firearms familiarity and general aggression regardless of the circumstances as tested with the hot sauce? Do people who are experienced with firearms experience a diminished testosterone increase, (do they have a higher baseline to begin with?) or perhaps an enhanced one (anticipation)? It seems like you could answer a ton of questions by checking for that second variable.
posted by Ryvar at 9:33 PM on May 9, 2006
I wonder if they asked the subjects if they had ever killed anything with a gun - kitten, bunny, deer, human, etc.
I've watched parts of a few hunting shows on cable and some of the participants seem to get very excited (if you know what I mean) about ambushing animals.
posted by MonkeySaltedNuts at 9:36 PM on May 9, 2006
I've watched parts of a few hunting shows on cable and some of the participants seem to get very excited (if you know what I mean) about ambushing animals.
posted by MonkeySaltedNuts at 9:36 PM on May 9, 2006
The hot sauce bit is interesting, though. The article is frustratingly oblique. What was this supposed to demonstrate?
Aggression. More hot sauce == more aggression.
I wonder if they controlled for gun size... .
posted by moonbiter at 9:41 PM on May 9, 2006
Pretty much anything that could equal "blowing stuff up" raises testosterone in men. IE, some of the things that amp me up are:
* Firing up the BBQ
* Lighting stuff on fire
* Driving fast in my Porsche
* Gawking at hot chicks in a club
* Skiiing
* Soccer
* Most other sports
Maybe men are just testosterone laden creatures. That's what I think.
/me doesn't really own a Porsche.
posted by drstein at 9:44 PM on May 9, 2006
* Firing up the BBQ
* Lighting stuff on fire
* Driving fast in my Porsche
* Gawking at hot chicks in a club
* Skiiing
* Soccer
* Most other sports
Maybe men are just testosterone laden creatures. That's what I think.
/me doesn't really own a Porsche.
posted by drstein at 9:44 PM on May 9, 2006
*ponder*
I'm a female, and I get kinda amped by guns. They should try it with women and see what happens.
posted by po at 9:54 PM on May 9, 2006
I'm a female, and I get kinda amped by guns. They should try it with women and see what happens.
posted by po at 9:54 PM on May 9, 2006
Maybe men are just testosterone laden creatures.Ha! As if!
I wonder what the results would be if the choice was between a game of Hungry Hungry Hippos and a power drill? Perhaps Chutes and Ladders vs. a 454 small block?
posted by ryoshu at 10:08 PM on May 9, 2006
What's with: "Take apart the game or the gun and write directions for assembly and disassembly."
Did they preselect for men that are familiar with breaking down a gun?
I'm fairly mechanical and while I've had near zero contact with guns I could probably figure out what to do. However I know many of my bretheren and sisten are mechanical klutzs and would be more likely to injure themselves than succeed.
posted by MonkeySaltedNuts at 10:12 PM on May 9, 2006
Did they preselect for men that are familiar with breaking down a gun?
I'm fairly mechanical and while I've had near zero contact with guns I could probably figure out what to do. However I know many of my bretheren and sisten are mechanical klutzs and would be more likely to injure themselves than succeed.
posted by MonkeySaltedNuts at 10:12 PM on May 9, 2006
If handling guns raises testosterone levels in men I wonder what raises estrogen levels.
posted by 517 at 10:49 PM on May 9, 2006
posted by 517 at 10:49 PM on May 9, 2006
wait, they were given a choice between the game and the gun? maybe the same kind of assholes who would put in more tobasco would also choose the gun?
posted by Tryptophan-5ht at 10:59 PM on May 9, 2006
posted by Tryptophan-5ht at 10:59 PM on May 9, 2006
Mama said a pistol was the devil's right hand.
posted by First Post at 11:03 PM on May 9, 2006
posted by First Post at 11:03 PM on May 9, 2006
Either the sauce they used was a damn sight stronger than Tabasco or this is the kind of study that's just not feasible in Texas, because I just drank a small cup of water with a drop, then five drops, of the habanero (the things the internet will make one do at night) and that wasn't just painless, that was practically undetectable.
Me, I'd put in the whole thing, whether they gave me kittens to play with or a WWII flak emplacement.
posted by furiousthought at 11:41 PM on May 9, 2006
Me, I'd put in the whole thing, whether they gave me kittens to play with or a WWII flak emplacement.
posted by furiousthought at 11:41 PM on May 9, 2006
via boingboing: Women can tell if men like babies by seeing pix of their faces
Men's faces give off subtle visual cues about their testosterone levels and the degree to which they like children, and women can detect these signs from photos, though they don't know what cues communicate these factors to them:
posted by MonkeySaltedNuts at 12:16 AM on May 10, 2006
Men's faces give off subtle visual cues about their testosterone levels and the degree to which they like children, and women can detect these signs from photos, though they don't know what cues communicate these factors to them:
James Roney at the University of California, Santa Barbara, US, and his colleagues asked 39 undergraduate men to look at pairs of pictures each consisting of a photo of an adult and a photo of an infant. The men were asked which photo they preferred. Researchers also took saliva samples from the male volunteers to determine their testosterone levels.Link, Update: Avi sez, "The Roney research paper is available for download here."
Each man was then asked to maintain a neutral expression while researchers photographed his face. Then, 29 female undergraduates rated the photographed male faces according to how much they believed the men liked children.
Researchers found that women could often correctly guess which men preferred the infant photos.
posted by MonkeySaltedNuts at 12:16 AM on May 10, 2006
It may just be that guns are protypically dangerous.
In my experience with firearms, the real problem is the ammunition. As for the weapons themselves, the only problem I've had is the occasional blood blister when dissasembling a balky .45 and getting my finger pinched by the slide lock. The rounds, on the other hand, can make wide, bloody holes in people and other living things.
posted by pax digita at 3:25 AM on May 10, 2006
In my experience with firearms, the real problem is the ammunition. As for the weapons themselves, the only problem I've had is the occasional blood blister when dissasembling a balky .45 and getting my finger pinched by the slide lock. The rounds, on the other hand, can make wide, bloody holes in people and other living things.
posted by pax digita at 3:25 AM on May 10, 2006
It may just be that guns are protypically dangerous.
In my experience with firearms, the real problem is the ammunition. As for the weapons themselves, the only problem I've had is the occasional blood blister when dissasembling a balky .45 and getting my finger pinched by the slide lock. The rounds, on the other hand, can make wide, bloody holes in people and other living things.
posted by pax digita at 3:31 AM on May 10, 2006 [1 favorite]
In my experience with firearms, the real problem is the ammunition. As for the weapons themselves, the only problem I've had is the occasional blood blister when dissasembling a balky .45 and getting my finger pinched by the slide lock. The rounds, on the other hand, can make wide, bloody holes in people and other living things.
posted by pax digita at 3:31 AM on May 10, 2006 [1 favorite]
in gun talk, I believe that's known as a double-tap, pax digita
posted by tim_in_oz at 3:40 AM on May 10, 2006
posted by tim_in_oz at 3:40 AM on May 10, 2006
Study shows that just handling a gun boobies increases testosterone levels in men.
As proved by Science.
Now, if you'll excuse me, I have to go point the pink pistol at the porcelain firing range.
posted by slimepuppy at 3:43 AM on May 10, 2006
As proved by Science.
Now, if you'll excuse me, I have to go point the pink pistol at the porcelain firing range.
posted by slimepuppy at 3:43 AM on May 10, 2006
pax digita that was a rather flippant dismissal. To a person who's never used a gun, even an unloaded one is dangerous to a certain point. Maybe that's why it's called a weapon irregardless of whether it has bullets or not. I'd speculate that the lack of familiarity, uncomfortableness or nervousness generated by the person who has to handle the weapon is the main factor in raising testosterone levels. I'm willing to bet that someone out there has already done a study that shows testosterone levels increase when a male is made nervous, uncomfortable or thrown into an unfamiliar environment.
Getting back to what MonkeySaltedNuts I'd be quite curious to see if the same thing happens using other objects which we all know to be dangerous. I'm even more curious what the results would be if they tried the same experiment on women since they also generate testosterone.
posted by furtive at 3:56 AM on May 10, 2006
Getting back to what MonkeySaltedNuts I'd be quite curious to see if the same thing happens using other objects which we all know to be dangerous. I'm even more curious what the results would be if they tried the same experiment on women since they also generate testosterone.
posted by furtive at 3:56 AM on May 10, 2006
po:They should try it with women and see what happens
Quick, call the IDF!!!
(earlier thread on that link..)
Gonna be saying 'this is my rifle, this is my gun' all day long now.. there goes my harassment suit... kthx
posted by cavalier at 4:27 AM on May 10, 2006
Quick, call the IDF!!!
(earlier thread on that link..)
Gonna be saying 'this is my rifle, this is my gun' all day long now.. there goes my harassment suit... kthx
posted by cavalier at 4:27 AM on May 10, 2006
MonkeySaltedNuts: It may just be that guns are protypically dangerous. Danger raises testosterone.
It does? Are you sure you're not confusing testosterone with adrenaline?
posted by spazzm at 4:33 AM on May 10, 2006
It does? Are you sure you're not confusing testosterone with adrenaline?
posted by spazzm at 4:33 AM on May 10, 2006
> 454 small block?
Somebody's bored a small block out to 454? The metal left in the casting is an imaginary number, right?
posted by jfuller at 4:59 AM on May 10, 2006
Somebody's bored a small block out to 454? The metal left in the casting is an imaginary number, right?
posted by jfuller at 4:59 AM on May 10, 2006
This explains why I've been getting so much action since I went to the firing range last month...
posted by runkelfinker at 5:20 AM on May 10, 2006
posted by runkelfinker at 5:20 AM on May 10, 2006
This questionable experiment is an agenda in search of proof. It seeks to link the mere handling of an inert object with increased aggression, caused by a "drug". GUNS AND DRUGS = BAD.
In the US, it seems there is a concerted effort to blame guns, rather than their owners, for all sorts of ills. I suspect there is a large percentage of young, educated men who have been indoctrinated to dislike guns.
This is directly at odds with the well-known fondness in these same young men for things that explode loudly. The popular media uses this fondness to make things "exciting". All the TV and movie baddies wave guns around, usually held rotated 90 degrees in the "gangsta" grip, guaranteed to eject a hot casing down your shirt collar. Now, THAT'S excitement.
The experimenters then link perceived aggression to the increase of the "drug". The results could as easily be used to show that one's ability to taste Tabasco in reduced by handling guns.
Bah. Bad experiment, faulty methodolgy, silly conclusions.
posted by Enron Hubbard at 6:01 AM on May 10, 2006
In the US, it seems there is a concerted effort to blame guns, rather than their owners, for all sorts of ills. I suspect there is a large percentage of young, educated men who have been indoctrinated to dislike guns.
This is directly at odds with the well-known fondness in these same young men for things that explode loudly. The popular media uses this fondness to make things "exciting". All the TV and movie baddies wave guns around, usually held rotated 90 degrees in the "gangsta" grip, guaranteed to eject a hot casing down your shirt collar. Now, THAT'S excitement.
The experimenters then link perceived aggression to the increase of the "drug". The results could as easily be used to show that one's ability to taste Tabasco in reduced by handling guns.
Bah. Bad experiment, faulty methodolgy, silly conclusions.
posted by Enron Hubbard at 6:01 AM on May 10, 2006
This American Life explores testosterone extremes.
posted by thanatogenous at 6:47 AM on May 10, 2006
posted by thanatogenous at 6:47 AM on May 10, 2006
This is ridiculous. I'm going to agree that this is an agenda laden experiment.
First off, the experiment should have been performed on simians, not humans, and especially not civilized humans who recognize what a gun is and does. The failure of the experiment is in the cognitive recognition of a weapon. Males, especially, are geared for aggression, period. If your gonads are external, you are going to be aggressive (to protect your gonads, duh). Thus, testosterone levels and aggressive behavior are linked with cognitive recognition of the ability to inflict force. This is lizard brain stuff, people. You versus an opponent. Your opponent is unarmed, you have a rock. Which one of you is going to be more aggresive? Answer, the one with the rock, because you know that a) you have the weapon, b) your opponent will try and take your weapon and use it against you, and c) you have to defeat your opponent otherwise he will defeat you.
I know, I know, you're going to take that theory and start poopoo'ing it because it states that males can't negotiate and human beings should be able to talk about their differences and blah, blah, blah. This is why I said this experiment should be performed with simians. And you cannot tell me that humans are not territorial, or that humans don't exhibit aggressive territorial and violent behavior (society of ownershiip anyone?). We just do it much more passive-aggressively now, using words and the force of law and money over the force of the fist.
That and I am an utter loon.
posted by daq at 6:50 AM on May 10, 2006
First off, the experiment should have been performed on simians, not humans, and especially not civilized humans who recognize what a gun is and does. The failure of the experiment is in the cognitive recognition of a weapon. Males, especially, are geared for aggression, period. If your gonads are external, you are going to be aggressive (to protect your gonads, duh). Thus, testosterone levels and aggressive behavior are linked with cognitive recognition of the ability to inflict force. This is lizard brain stuff, people. You versus an opponent. Your opponent is unarmed, you have a rock. Which one of you is going to be more aggresive? Answer, the one with the rock, because you know that a) you have the weapon, b) your opponent will try and take your weapon and use it against you, and c) you have to defeat your opponent otherwise he will defeat you.
I know, I know, you're going to take that theory and start poopoo'ing it because it states that males can't negotiate and human beings should be able to talk about their differences and blah, blah, blah. This is why I said this experiment should be performed with simians. And you cannot tell me that humans are not territorial, or that humans don't exhibit aggressive territorial and violent behavior (society of ownershiip anyone?). We just do it much more passive-aggressively now, using words and the force of law and money over the force of the fist.
That and I am an utter loon.
posted by daq at 6:50 AM on May 10, 2006
Want to make your testosterone level go through the roof? Drink whisky from the bottle and smoke a big fat cigar whilst driving a muscle car/riding a motorcycle through the desert with a large calibre handgun and a "hot chick" whilst listening to some country/rock/whatever-the-hell-you-like-as-long-as-it's-got-wailing-guitar-chords.
It also helps if you are wearing dusty leathers/denim and sunglasses and the whole thing is being filmed by Ridley Scott with the camera speed cranked up and a really nice colour filter. Your alternative is to have Michael Bay doing one of those neck-snapping whip-pans whilst rising up through the air from a helicopter which causes a massive dust cloud which makes you squint *just like Clint* only for a moment. Then you can say you are truly a man.
Almost gives me wood just typing this.
posted by longbaugh at 7:02 AM on May 10, 2006
It also helps if you are wearing dusty leathers/denim and sunglasses and the whole thing is being filmed by Ridley Scott with the camera speed cranked up and a really nice colour filter. Your alternative is to have Michael Bay doing one of those neck-snapping whip-pans whilst rising up through the air from a helicopter which causes a massive dust cloud which makes you squint *just like Clint* only for a moment. Then you can say you are truly a man.
Almost gives me wood just typing this.
posted by longbaugh at 7:02 AM on May 10, 2006
Does day-to-day testosterone levels actually track day to day agression?
posted by delmoi at 7:18 AM on May 10, 2006
posted by delmoi at 7:18 AM on May 10, 2006
Longbaugh's suggestion has me so hot, I'm questioning my own sexuality as a man.
posted by scaryblackdeath at 7:21 AM on May 10, 2006
posted by scaryblackdeath at 7:21 AM on May 10, 2006
This thread is so ripe for innuendo...
What do Italian suppositories have to do with anything?
posted by KevinSkomsvold at 8:15 AM on May 10, 2006
What do Italian suppositories have to do with anything?
posted by KevinSkomsvold at 8:15 AM on May 10, 2006
I think the better question is, what don't Italian suppositories have to do with anything?
posted by Anonymous at 9:08 AM on May 10, 2006
posted by Anonymous at 9:08 AM on May 10, 2006
First off, the experiment should have been performed on simians, not humans, and especially not civilized humans who recognize what a gun is and does.
Great idea. Let's give guns to monkeys. Next we'll be looking at the ruins of the Statue of Liberty sprawled on a beach.
posted by horsewithnoname at 9:53 AM on May 10, 2006
Great idea. Let's give guns to monkeys. Next we'll be looking at the ruins of the Statue of Liberty sprawled on a beach.
posted by horsewithnoname at 9:53 AM on May 10, 2006
Somebody's bored a small block out to 454?
Indeed.
For that reason alone I think most guys would choose the small block over the Chutes and Ladders game.
And what Enron Hubbard said.
posted by ryoshu at 10:04 AM on May 10, 2006
Indeed.
For that reason alone I think most guys would choose the small block over the Chutes and Ladders game.
And what Enron Hubbard said.
posted by ryoshu at 10:04 AM on May 10, 2006
GUNS ARE AWESOME GUYS! RAARARRRAGRGH!
Ahem.
What I meant to say is that I definitely believe this study.
posted by blacklite at 11:27 AM on May 10, 2006
Ahem.
What I meant to say is that I definitely believe this study.
posted by blacklite at 11:27 AM on May 10, 2006
“Drink whisky from the bottle and smoke a big fat cigar whilst driving a muscle car/riding a motorcycle through the desert with a large calibre handgun and a "hot chick" whilst listening to some country/rock/whatever-the-hell-you-like-as-long-as-it's-got-wailing-guitar-chords.
It also helps if you are wearing dusty leathers/denim and sunglasses and the whole thing is being filmed by Ridley Scott with the camera speed cranked up and a really nice colour filter.”
I drive to work like that EVERY day.
Big part of the thing is that you really have to drill people not to fuck around with guns. People do seem to get a little wacky with firearms, perhaps it is the testosterone.
But they’re not toys and anyone who can’t handle their testosterone rush isn’t someone I want next to me.
I have a ritual in handling firearms. It’s a litany, practically OCD in nature.
My wife did get a bit goofy when I was teaching her to shoot. Students don’t seem to have that, perhaps it’s the formality. But she’s leveled off and takes it seriously and actually shoots quite well.
I’m not surprised though, considering how much of a fetish firearms are in movies and t.v.
But I suspect handling nearly any weapon lends itself to an increase in testosterone.
posted by Smedleyman at 12:39 PM on May 10, 2006
It also helps if you are wearing dusty leathers/denim and sunglasses and the whole thing is being filmed by Ridley Scott with the camera speed cranked up and a really nice colour filter.”
I drive to work like that EVERY day.
Big part of the thing is that you really have to drill people not to fuck around with guns. People do seem to get a little wacky with firearms, perhaps it is the testosterone.
But they’re not toys and anyone who can’t handle their testosterone rush isn’t someone I want next to me.
I have a ritual in handling firearms. It’s a litany, practically OCD in nature.
My wife did get a bit goofy when I was teaching her to shoot. Students don’t seem to have that, perhaps it’s the formality. But she’s leveled off and takes it seriously and actually shoots quite well.
I’m not surprised though, considering how much of a fetish firearms are in movies and t.v.
But I suspect handling nearly any weapon lends itself to an increase in testosterone.
posted by Smedleyman at 12:39 PM on May 10, 2006
Great idea. Let's give guns to monkeys. Next we'll be looking at the ruins of the Statue of Liberty sprawled on a beach.
Ah, yes, but the surviving men will be the real ones, the guns gripped tightly in their hands flooding them with testosterone even unto death.
posted by Anonymous at 12:45 PM on May 10, 2006
Smedleyman - Do you leave the hot chick in the car to watch over the gun or do you keep them both under your desk?
;)
I remember way back when I handled my first ever firearm in the Combined Cadet Force (oh so so long ago...). Imagine a lanky 13 year old with a .303 SMLE bolt-action who had been brought up on Commando books and war movies. It took about three seconds for the Sergeant to tear me a new one for pissing about and since then any time I've handled any weapon I've taken it extremely seriously.
posted by longbaugh at 12:56 PM on May 10, 2006
;)
I remember way back when I handled my first ever firearm in the Combined Cadet Force (oh so so long ago...). Imagine a lanky 13 year old with a .303 SMLE bolt-action who had been brought up on Commando books and war movies. It took about three seconds for the Sergeant to tear me a new one for pissing about and since then any time I've handled any weapon I've taken it extremely seriously.
posted by longbaugh at 12:56 PM on May 10, 2006
So... handling a gun results in increased hair loss and baldness?
Maybe I'll just have to invent tin cans that knock themselves over when you point at them and say "bang!". :-)
posted by -harlequin- at 12:58 PM on May 10, 2006
Maybe I'll just have to invent tin cans that knock themselves over when you point at them and say "bang!". :-)
posted by -harlequin- at 12:58 PM on May 10, 2006
Excellent news. It might help them overcome the innate fear that causes them to pick a gun up in the first place.
posted by Decani at 3:36 PM on May 10, 2006
posted by Decani at 3:36 PM on May 10, 2006
So... handling a gun results in increased hair loss and baldness?
Hey, when you're hardcore you don't need hair. Fuck hair. Jean-Luc Picard? Hardcore. Hunter S. Thompson? Fucking right. The guy that Bruce Willis played in Die Hard? Quite possibly hardcore as well.
posted by blacklite at 6:22 PM on May 10, 2006
Hey, when you're hardcore you don't need hair. Fuck hair. Jean-Luc Picard? Hardcore. Hunter S. Thompson? Fucking right. The guy that Bruce Willis played in Die Hard? Quite possibly hardcore as well.
posted by blacklite at 6:22 PM on May 10, 2006
longbaugh: Shit man, that's cool.
posted by BackwardsHatClub at 12:04 PM on May 11, 2006
posted by BackwardsHatClub at 12:04 PM on May 11, 2006
To whoever said some people shouldn't have guns, I agree, reminds me of this FPS Doug video.
posted by BackwardsHatClub at 12:12 PM on May 11, 2006
posted by BackwardsHatClub at 12:12 PM on May 11, 2006
Because I, too, can't get enough of a good gag—
posted by eritain at 1:11 PM on May 11, 2006
Metafilter: Let's give guns to monkeys.That is all.
Metafilter: There must be a euphemism around here somewhere.
Metafilter: Results in increased hair loss.
posted by eritain at 1:11 PM on May 11, 2006
« Older Who's Gonna Love You When Your Looks Are Gone? | You spell 'honor' like a Brit! Newer »
This thread has been archived and is closed to new comments
posted by klangklangston at 9:01 PM on May 9, 2006