Was the 2004 election stolen?
June 1, 2006 7:35 PM Subscribe
This post was deleted for the following reason: double
Gah phooie. I missed up posting. The post was supposed to read: "Was the 2004 election stolen?", not "Apparently so".
:-( I'll flag it.
posted by lupus_yonderboy at 7:37 PM on June 1, 2006
:-( I'll flag it.
posted by lupus_yonderboy at 7:37 PM on June 1, 2006
this thread was stolen a few hours ago. thats what he was trying to tell you.
posted by tsarfan at 7:38 PM on June 1, 2006
posted by tsarfan at 7:38 PM on June 1, 2006
ARG and it's a double! I *searched*! I looked for "elections" and "fraud" -- I searched for the URL!
sorry... flagged again!
posted by lupus_yonderboy at 7:40 PM on June 1, 2006
sorry... flagged again!
posted by lupus_yonderboy at 7:40 PM on June 1, 2006
wow, too bad that old bitch wouldn't give them a goatse cake, that would have been awesome.
posted by puke & cry at 8:08 PM on June 1, 2006 [1 favorite]
posted by puke & cry at 8:08 PM on June 1, 2006 [1 favorite]
I looked for "elections" and "fraud" -- I searched for the URL!
Interesting though, that you saw fit to use the 'Bush' tag but didn't do a search for it, which would have resulted in you seeing that your post would have been a double.
I guess the key is to exhaust every search method possible to make sure it aint a double, such as, for example, scrolling down or doing a text search of the front page. But no biggie. Doubles happen. I forgive you, my child.
posted by Effigy2000 at 8:18 PM on June 1, 2006
Interesting though, that you saw fit to use the 'Bush' tag but didn't do a search for it, which would have resulted in you seeing that your post would have been a double.
I guess the key is to exhaust every search method possible to make sure it aint a double, such as, for example, scrolling down or doing a text search of the front page. But no biggie. Doubles happen. I forgive you, my child.
posted by Effigy2000 at 8:18 PM on June 1, 2006
I looked for "elections" and "fraud" -- I searched for the URL!
Interesting though, that you saw fit to use the 'Bush' tag but didn't do a search for it, which would have resulted in you seeing that your post would have been a double.
I guess the key is to exhaust every search method possible to make sure it aint a double, such as, for example, scrolling down or doing a text search of the front page. But no biggie. Doubles happen. I forgive you, my child.
posted by Effigy2000 at 8:18 PM on June 1, 2006
Interesting though, that you saw fit to use the 'Bush' tag but didn't do a search for it, which would have resulted in you seeing that your post would have been a double.
I guess the key is to exhaust every search method possible to make sure it aint a double, such as, for example, scrolling down or doing a text search of the front page. But no biggie. Doubles happen. I forgive you, my child.
posted by Effigy2000 at 8:18 PM on June 1, 2006
I looked for "elections" and "fraud" -- I searched for the URL!
Interesting though, that you saw fit to use the 'Bush' tag but didn't do a search for it, which would have resulted in you seeing that your post would have been a double.
I guess the key is to exhaust every search method possible to make sure it aint a double, such as, for example, scrolling down or doing a text search of the front page. But no biggie. Doubles happen. I forgive you, my child.
posted by Effigy2000 at 8:18 PM on June 1, 2006
Interesting though, that you saw fit to use the 'Bush' tag but didn't do a search for it, which would have resulted in you seeing that your post would have been a double.
I guess the key is to exhaust every search method possible to make sure it aint a double, such as, for example, scrolling down or doing a text search of the front page. But no biggie. Doubles happen. I forgive you, my child.
posted by Effigy2000 at 8:18 PM on June 1, 2006
Now if I could work out why when I post here I keep triple posting my response, then I'd be very happy.
posted by Effigy2000 at 8:19 PM on June 1, 2006
posted by Effigy2000 at 8:19 PM on June 1, 2006
is the the part of the thread where we all go crazy because it will be deleted?
posted by exogenous at 8:19 PM on June 1, 2006
posted by exogenous at 8:19 PM on June 1, 2006
No. it's the part where you realize how boneheaded using a "folksonomy" is on a site as big as this one (in terms of both users and posts.) It doesn't scale well.
posted by trondant at 8:23 PM on June 1, 2006
posted by trondant at 8:23 PM on June 1, 2006
Now if I could work out why when I post here I keep triple posting my response, then I'd be very happy.
posted by Effigy2000
Only one of this post? Weird.
posted by tellurian at 8:24 PM on June 1, 2006
posted by Effigy2000
Only one of this post? Weird.
posted by tellurian at 8:24 PM on June 1, 2006
Fezzik -- Are there rocks ahead?
posted by icosahedral at 8:24 PM on June 1, 2006
posted by icosahedral at 8:24 PM on June 1, 2006
No more rhymes now, I mean it!
posted by icosahedral at 8:27 PM on June 1, 2006
posted by icosahedral at 8:27 PM on June 1, 2006
Well guys, someone looking over my shoulder just asked "what's goatse?"
posted by StickyCarpet at 8:28 PM on June 1, 2006
posted by StickyCarpet at 8:28 PM on June 1, 2006
You should video tape their expression when you show them.
posted by IronLizard at 8:30 PM on June 1, 2006
posted by IronLizard at 8:30 PM on June 1, 2006
Last post before deletion unless there are more!
posted by allen.spaulding at 8:30 PM on June 1, 2006
posted by allen.spaulding at 8:30 PM on June 1, 2006
They call me an old fart. Not because of my age, but because I'm silent but deadly.
posted by Afroblanco at 8:31 PM on June 1, 2006
posted by Afroblanco at 8:31 PM on June 1, 2006
Anybody want a peanut?
posted by Divine_Wino at 8:31 PM on June 1, 2006
posted by Divine_Wino at 8:31 PM on June 1, 2006
GAH.
posted by icosahedral at 8:31 PM on June 1, 2006
posted by icosahedral at 8:31 PM on June 1, 2006
« Older "Holy Queering of Pop Culture, Batman!" | The Condor Years. Newer »
This thread has been archived and is closed to new comments
posted by puke & cry at 7:36 PM on June 1, 2006 [1 favorite]