Comments on: YouTube-like interface, but for porn.

YouTube-like interface, but for porn.

c:\awesome — Sun, 02 Jul 2006 16:25:54 -0800

PornoTube - it's like YouTube, only for porn! [so NSFW]

By: cortex

cortex — Sun, 02 Jul 2006 16:28:31 -0800

Debbie Does DSL

By: bjork24

bjork24 — Sun, 02 Jul 2006 16:28:55 -0800

embedded videos of boobies!

By: hermitosis

hermitosis — Sun, 02 Jul 2006 16:35:04 -0800

Metafilter yet again inspiring me to say, "Well there goes my weekend!"

By: Meatbomb

Meatbomb — Sun, 02 Jul 2006 16:38:10 -0800

Porn on the internet? This changes everything.

By: Jairus

Jairus — Sun, 02 Jul 2006 16:39:52 -0800

Wow. A single-link post... to a porn site. Smashing.

By: matteo

matteo — Sun, 02 Jul 2006 16:40:20 -0800

YouBewb?

By: reklaw

reklaw — Sun, 02 Jul 2006 16:40:27 -0800

I thought porn was supposed to do this kind of thing first, not play catch-up.

By: obvious

obvious — Sun, 02 Jul 2006 16:41:50 -0800

Porn 2.0

By: mediareport

mediareport — Sun, 02 Jul 2006 16:42:58 -0800

Well, Veoh just dumped all of its adult content (with no warning to users, apparently), so it was only a matter of time before other sites started getting the 2nd-tier attention.

By: brundlefly

brundlefly — Sun, 02 Jul 2006 16:45:56 -0800

I wonder if there's a PornoFilter out there where people complain about single-link posts to PornoTube...

By: Serial Killer Slumber Party

Serial Killer Slumber Party — Sun, 02 Jul 2006 16:46:30 -0800

I thought porn was supposed to do this kind of thing first, not play catch-up. Google was in fact based on a highly popular porno search algorithm. You don't wanna know what inspired Mefi.

By: dgaicun

dgaicun — Sun, 02 Jul 2006 16:47:00 -0800

GooTube

By: danb

danb — Sun, 02 Jul 2006 16:47:42 -0800

YouBewb I think you missed the more obvious one.

By: mediareport

mediareport — Sun, 02 Jul 2006 16:50:44 -0800

A single-link post... to a porn site. Oh, please. Single-link posts are fine here - always have been. If you don't believe me, here's Matt saying so just this afternoon. And the site's been linking to porn for years; if it bothers you, what are you even doing in this thread? There's no denying that this kind of adult-content user submission video site is timely news. Yeesh. How can someone with a user number of 1178 have missed this kind of basic stuff, and then rush to judgment in such an off-base way? Ignore it, c:\awesome.

By: dgaicun

dgaicun — Sun, 02 Jul 2006 16:51:16 -0800

The audio section is fantastic. I should upload my Russ Myers collection. Wakka-chikka wakka-chikka.

By: staggernation

staggernation — Sun, 02 Jul 2006 16:52:42 -0800

I just got fired from my job. Can someone tell me what "NSWF" stands for?

By: vacapinta

vacapinta — Sun, 02 Jul 2006 17:00:31 -0800

You should be more worried that you dont understand what "Porno" means.

By: jonson

jonson — Sun, 02 Jul 2006 17:13:29 -0800

disappointing.

By: bobo123

bobo123 — Sun, 02 Jul 2006 17:17:40 -0800

Saw this on digg yesterday, and I don't think it's very web 2.0, like no comments, the tag interface doesn't browse past the letter "a". They've only copied superficial aspects of youtube.

By: mischief

mischief — Sun, 02 Jul 2006 17:37:34 -0800

I just got fired from my job. We don't care.

By: Hicksu

Hicksu — Sun, 02 Jul 2006 17:41:24 -0800

I care..

By: jonson

jonson — Sun, 02 Jul 2006 17:42:57 -0800

mischief, take a break from being a prick, and you'd see that staggernation was telling a joke. The joke being, see, that he didn't know what NSFW stood for, and then as a consequence, he opened the link while at work, you see, and... sigh. Never mind. Go back to being a prick.

By: ninjew

ninjew — Sun, 02 Jul 2006 17:46:14 -0800

Please people... this is only going to clog up the tubes.

By: clevershark

clevershark — Sun, 02 Jul 2006 17:46:25 -0800

Actually I think staggernation was hinting that "NSFW" was misspelt "NSWF", but it's since been corrected, killing the joke.

By: puke & cry

puke & cry — Sun, 02 Jul 2006 17:46:29 -0800

Shitty joke, then. Pretty shitty site too.

By: mischief

mischief — Sun, 02 Jul 2006 17:49:32 -0800

Go back to being a prick. OK

By: Tryptophan-5ht

Tryptophan-5ht — Sun, 02 Jul 2006 17:53:05 -0800

NOT SAFE WITH FORK! this site sucks (poor selection) but I could see it being very awesome once it picks up.

By: Meatbomb

Meatbomb — Sun, 02 Jul 2006 17:54:55 -0800

What the internet needs is a 100% halal porn site.

By: danb

danb — Sun, 02 Jul 2006 18:14:50 -0800

Not Shockwave Flash?

By: casconed

casconed — Sun, 02 Jul 2006 18:28:54 -0800

xtube is way better.

By: bukharin

bukharin — Sun, 02 Jul 2006 19:05:26 -0800

porn porn porn

By: papakwanz

papakwanz — Sun, 02 Jul 2006 19:15:12 -0800

Whole lotta... gay on there. not that there's anything wrong with that!

By: emelenjr

emelenjr — Sun, 02 Jul 2006 19:22:30 -0800

YouLube YouTubesteak

By: rinkjustice

rinkjustice — Sun, 02 Jul 2006 19:33:15 -0800

You should be ashamed of posting and condoning smut on a website frequented by young people. Get a life. Seriously.

By: Neiltupper

Neiltupper — Sun, 02 Jul 2006 19:36:06 -0800

mischief, take a break from being a prick, and you'd see that staggernation was telling a joke. D'ya think?

By: exlotuseater

exlotuseater — Sun, 02 Jul 2006 19:52:28 -0800

Oh, please. Young people can find smut all over the internet, it isn't as if they come here to find it. p.s. I condone smut in all forms, including that on corn.

By: Smedleyman

Smedleyman — Sun, 02 Jul 2006 19:54:43 -0800

Its the buildup and the tension that makes these exciting. Watching you tube porn without that context is like watching a soccer highlight movie of nothing but the 30 seconds of scoring clipped from hundreds of games-.

By: mendel

mendel — Sun, 02 Jul 2006 20:00:09 -0800

The buildup and tension is the time it takes to find the right video, silly.

By: cortex

cortex — Sun, 02 Jul 2006 20:00:56 -0800

You should be ashamed of posting and condoning smut on a website frequented by young people. Get a life. Seriously. You should be ashamed of posting blindered someone-think-of-the-children-isms on a website frequented by thinking, self-directed individuals...

By: adamgreenfield

adamgreenfield — Sun, 02 Jul 2006 20:04:29 -0800

I was saying "Boo-urns."

By: ZachsMind

ZachsMind — Sun, 02 Jul 2006 20:10:51 -0800

I liked the kung fu porn.

By: loquacious

loquacious — Sun, 02 Jul 2006 20:23:24 -0800

You should be ashamed of posting and condoning smut on a website frequented by young people. Get a life. Seriously. What, like young people aren't even bigger perverts than their parents? What, like the vast majority of the users here aren't 25-30+ in age? On a site that once featured paid advertisements for the Suicide Girls? Where we even say nasty, forbidden words like "fuck", "shit", and "shut the fuck up you gimp-humping nunshitter"? You should be ashamed of bringing your puritanical asshat and then donning it in here in this weird, wooly corner of the web.

By: bukharin

bukharin — Sun, 02 Jul 2006 20:23:42 -0800

You should be ashamed of posting blindered someone-think-of-the-children-isms on a website frequented by thinking, self-directed individuals... thank you, cortex.

By: UbuRoivas

UbuRoivas — Sun, 02 Jul 2006 20:28:51 -0800

metafilter: shut the fuck up you gimp-humping nunshitter

By: ZachsMind

ZachsMind — Sun, 02 Jul 2006 20:30:51 -0800

RinkJustice: "You should be ashamed of posting and condoning smut on a website frequented by young people. Get a life. Seriously." You actually saying that with a straight face? Seriously. Contrary to (un)popular belief, it is not the responsibility of every adult on the internet to protect children from reality. If a parent wants to protect their child from whatever that parent perceives as "smut," it is that parent's responsibility. Besides, any 'young person' who doesn't know what a boobie looks like? Obviously wasn't breast fed. No. I didn't say that with a straight face.

By: boo_radley

boo_radley — Sun, 02 Jul 2006 20:32:03 -0800

so that's what the Russian military is like, huh?

By: bradth27

bradth27 — Sun, 02 Jul 2006 20:33:51 -0800

You should be ashamed of posting and condoning smut on a website frequented by young people. Get a life. Seriously. I've been around for a few years now, and I've seen some strange things posted on Metafilter. However, I've never seen a link to anything involving sex. Jesus, it's just so surprising.

By: brundlefly

brundlefly — Sun, 02 Jul 2006 20:39:12 -0800

Shitcock bitchfucker!* *Best expletive ever.... until I read gimp-humping nunshitter...

By: signal

signal — Sun, 02 Jul 2006 20:45:15 -0800

You should be ashamed of posting and condoning smut on a website frequented by young people. Wow, real-life people actually use "smut" in a non-ironic way? Ok, fess up, who got their grandma a MeFi account for christmas?

By: bradth27

bradth27 — Sun, 02 Jul 2006 20:52:16 -0800

Ok, fess up, who got their grandma a MeFi account for christmas? Me. It was a cheap gift. Besides, she uses "instant" in her banana pudding these days.

By: shmegegge

shmegegge — Sun, 02 Jul 2006 20:53:31 -0800

wow, this site desperately needs a way to easily differentiate gay porn from straight porn, and lesbian porn from male gay porn. there's simply way too much room for error in the system as it stands.

By: majick

majick — Sun, 02 Jul 2006 21:02:35 -0800

It seems like 90% of the clips -- apart from the tremendous collection of gay clips -- are 10 to 30 seconds long. What, exactly, is the point of a ten second porn clip? Hell, what's the point of a 60 second porn clip? Why even bother uploading such a thing?

By: horsewithnoname

horsewithnoname — Sun, 02 Jul 2006 21:08:48 -0800

My sources tell me that the clips are often used to facilitate masturbation, majick.

By: Hackworth

Hackworth — Sun, 02 Jul 2006 21:12:01 -0800

and advertising.

By: majick

majick — Sun, 02 Jul 2006 21:12:21 -0800

In ten seconds?!?

By: horsewithnoname

horsewithnoname — Sun, 02 Jul 2006 21:18:06 -0800

Why not? Who's going to be disappointed?

By: rmmcclay

rmmcclay — Sun, 02 Jul 2006 21:18:38 -0800

Nudity Seems Fucking Wonderful

By: mediareport

mediareport — Sun, 02 Jul 2006 21:24:57 -0800

You should be ashamed of posting and condoning smut on a website frequented by young people. Get a life. Seriously. *spits beer out nose* Someone tell me this guy's being post-neo-retro-ironic or something. And that his diet plan site is, too. MeFi's been condoning smut on the front page for as long as I can remember. Seriously.

By: chimaera

chimaera — Sun, 02 Jul 2006 21:40:52 -0800

I just got fired from my job. Can someone tell me what "NSWF" stands for? Doesn't much matter what it stands for considering that the very first two syllables of the post are "Porno."

By: Davaal

Davaal — Sun, 02 Jul 2006 21:41:06 -0800

"you should be ashamed of posting and condoning smut on a website frequented by young people. Get a life. Seriously." a life without smut is a boring life indeed... young people know this. i guess the better question is: how are young people getting on this site? i had to have a bank account and a secret decoder pin....

By: solid-one-love

solid-one-love — Sun, 02 Jul 2006 21:50:07 -0800

You should be ashamed of posting and condoning smut on a website frequented by young people. Get a life. Seriously. You should be ashamed of promoting your particular backwards Bronze Age ideology pretty much anywhere. Get bent. Seriously.

By: papakwanz

papakwanz — Sun, 02 Jul 2006 22:02:43 -0800

Why even bother uploading such a thing? I use this tape to stimulate myself into having an erection. Then I use that erection to masturbate with.

By: UbuRoivas

UbuRoivas — Sun, 02 Jul 2006 22:07:25 -0800

You should be ashamed of promoting your particular backwards Bronze Age ideology pretty much anywhere. Get bent. Seriously. You should be ashamed of feeding a troll on a website frequented by people who dislike derails. Get edumucated. Seriously. The troll's profile states that his top tags for AskMe are: website - marketing - online - girls. Need I say more?

By: loquacious

loquacious — Sun, 02 Jul 2006 22:22:50 -0800

Tell me more about the girls. Are they naked?

By: UbuRoivas

UbuRoivas — Sun, 02 Jul 2006 22:32:25 -0800

Tell me more about the girls. Are they naked? No idea - it would cost me $1.99/min to find out.

By: loquacious

loquacious — Sun, 02 Jul 2006 22:44:11 -0800

$1.99 a minute!? That's like a whole 33 cents!

By: thirteenkiller

thirteenkiller — Sun, 02 Jul 2006 22:55:20 -0800

Ubu, he's not a troll. He's a Mormon.

By: UbuRoivas

UbuRoivas — Sun, 02 Jul 2006 23:07:45 -0800

Ah, a moomintroll!

By: solid-one-love

solid-one-love — Sun, 02 Jul 2006 23:12:19 -0800

You might want to get edumacated and check out his posting history, Ubu. Good dog.

By: puke & cry

puke & cry — Sun, 02 Jul 2006 23:14:39 -0800

Both posts tagged with girls are related to his three daughters, which I doubt anyone else thinks of related to the girls tag. He's not a troll, he's a douchebag.

By: It's Raining Florence Henderson

It's Raining Florence Henderson — Sun, 02 Jul 2006 23:15:09 -0800

Pepsi Blue Balls

By: UbuRoivas

UbuRoivas — Sun, 02 Jul 2006 23:24:02 -0800

You might want to get edumacated and check out his posting history, Ubu. Good dog. Sure. And can you also tell me where I can check in my sense of humour? I didn't realise I was supposed to leave it at the door.

By: bukharin

bukharin — Sun, 02 Jul 2006 23:28:29 -0800

Pornotube is like dystopian Newspeak jargon from Brave New World. "DMX-128b, are you watching pornotube again?"

By: fenriq

fenriq — Sun, 02 Jul 2006 23:46:09 -0800

This is a better thing than what our government is doing. And I giggle anytime anyone says porno, its so delightfully quaint. Like chug-a-lug.

By: whimsicalnymph

whimsicalnymph — Mon, 03 Jul 2006 00:00:16 -0800

I did a search on their page for "sex" and it turned up no results-- (hahahahha....) The eleven minute "severina vuckovic" is pretty good though.

By: mediareport

mediareport — Mon, 03 Jul 2006 00:21:41 -0800

And can you also tell me where I can check in my sense of humour? Well, to be fair, you're the one who came in all serious-like about how we shouldn't feed the trolls and going, "Need I say more?" Where was your sense of humor then? Anyway, this thread might help you understand that rinkjustice almost certainly wasn't trolling here, and has a serious misunderstanding about the place of adult content at MeFi.

By: UbuRoivas

UbuRoivas — Mon, 03 Jul 2006 00:37:23 -0800

(well, i thought it was at least vaguely humorous that somebody ostensibly opposed to porn would have "website - marketing - online - girls" as their most used tags, but maybe that's just the kind of coincidental irony that tickles me. i certainly never expected anybody to assume i was being serious! anyway, nothing to see here)

By: Joeforking

Joeforking — Mon, 03 Jul 2006 00:46:41 -0800

What sort of porn site returns no results for santorum?

By: Jon Mitchell

Jon Mitchell — Mon, 03 Jul 2006 00:47:54 -0800

Buhkharin: Thanks for (inadvertently) reminding me of Overdrawn At The Memory Bank. It has the best (ok) worst future-speak of any film I've ever seen....

By: sparkletone

sparkletone — Mon, 03 Jul 2006 01:20:06 -0800

Buhkharin: Thanks for (inadvertently) reminding me of Overdrawn At The Memory Bank. It has the best (ok) worst future-speak of any film I've ever seen.... Do not bumble, or bobble, the Fingle dopple.

By: Astro Zombie

Astro Zombie — Mon, 03 Jul 2006 06:22:57 -0800

I carry my pornotube with me.

By: empath

empath — Mon, 03 Jul 2006 06:47:23 -0800

Daily Motion, a french youtube clone, has a much better selection of porn, IMO. Check the 'sexy' channel.

By: Methylviolet

Methylviolet — Mon, 03 Jul 2006 07:50:52 -0800

Excellent -- thanks, awesome. I was just about to AskMe "Where can I find free porn on the internet? My google-fu has failed me."

By: goodnewsfortheinsane

goodnewsfortheinsane — Mon, 03 Jul 2006 08:13:59 -0800

Can someone tell me what "NSWF" stands for? Now Staggernation Will get Fired.

By: Tokil

Tokil — Mon, 03 Jul 2006 09:13:46 -0800

That's pretty poor really. Nice idea but badly done. And they need some more female porn...

By: furtive

furtive — Mon, 03 Jul 2006 09:23:35 -0800

blog.askjolene.com serves me well.

By: meehawl

meehawl — Mon, 03 Jul 2006 09:41:44 -0800

This link was worth it, if only for the World Cup Porn.

By: stet

stet — Mon, 03 Jul 2006 10:06:31 -0800

Hey, that pornography is only tangentially related to the World Cup!

By: CynicalKnight

CynicalKnight — Mon, 03 Jul 2006 11:15:31 -0800

He's not a troll, he's a douchebag Isn't that a popular Elton John tune?

By: soyjoy

soyjoy — Mon, 03 Jul 2006 11:22:02 -0800

I giggle anytime anyone says porno, its so delightfully quaint. Like chug-a-lug. That's also funny, because chug-a-lug is my favorite genre of porno.

By: 2sheets

2sheets — Mon, 03 Jul 2006 11:38:57 -0800

"Ubu, he's not a troll. He's a Mormon." Meaning he's a follower of a con man, pedophile and adulterer who received dictation from god by talking to a hat and some magic stones. There's also a raving maniac shouting at cars on the corner who doesn't approve, but I'm not to worried about it.

By: fandango_matt

fandango_matt — Mon, 03 Jul 2006 12:02:29 -0800

posted by 2sheets Meaning [as a Mormon] he's a follower of a con man, pedophile and adulterer who received dictation from god by talking to a hat and some magic stones. Wait, isn't that the same description for Scientologists?

By: fandango_matt

fandango_matt — Mon, 03 Jul 2006 12:02:30 -0800

By: cortex

cortex — Mon, 03 Jul 2006 12:08:41 -0800

Wait, isn't that...

By: Astro Zombie

Astro Zombie — Mon, 03 Jul 2006 12:11:46 -0800

Wait ...

By: puke & cry

puke & cry — Mon, 03 Jul 2006 13:02:03 -0800

Wait a minute....

By: loquacious

loquacious — Mon, 03 Jul 2006 13:09:20 -0800

Wait for it...

By: cortex

cortex — Mon, 03 Jul 2006 13:19:32 -0800

Wait a got-damn minute...

By: Astro Zombie

Astro Zombie — Mon, 03 Jul 2006 13:22:24 -0800

Waiter!

By: dgaicun

dgaicun — Mon, 03 Jul 2006 13:27:35 -0800

Water!

By: raider

raider — Mon, 03 Jul 2006 13:51:05 -0800

What?

By: jessamyn

jessamyn — Mon, 03 Jul 2006 13:59:50 -0800

some of the "popular tags" are just numbers. I understand some of these, but 44? 3 5 8 18 25 44 69

By: ab3

ab3 — Mon, 03 Jul 2006 15:18:07 -0800

I understand some of these, but 44? um... did you click on the link? when you do, one explanation pretty quickly comes to mind as to what the 44 might mean... (hint: it should probably be followed by "DD" or something around there...)

By: Smedleyman

Smedleyman — Mon, 03 Jul 2006 15:23:45 -0800

So how would you download these movies? ...I’m, um, asking for a friend of mine.’s buddy.’s uncle...who is a COP! It looks like flash. I’ve had the same problems downloading stuff like the “badger badger badger” flash. (....hmmm....maybe I should askmefi....)

By: jessamyn

jessamyn — Mon, 03 Jul 2006 15:41:26 -0800

But why not 46, or 38 or other similar breast size numbers? It just seems to show that there's not a lot there yet.

By: cortex

cortex — Mon, 03 Jul 2006 15:47:42 -0800

Quit polluting our porn thread with your library science you—you—you library scientist!

By: BrotherCaine

BrotherCaine — Mon, 03 Jul 2006 15:59:47 -0800

Use greasemonkey + unembed? or unembed bookmarklet? Don't ask me how you playback the .swf file, cause I don't know. Alternatively, use some kind of video stream capture software.

By: jamesonandwater

jamesonandwater — Mon, 03 Jul 2006 16:47:40 -0800

Wow, there's a lot of peeing related stuff on there. And the "Man masturbating with dirty gym socks" vid is also a real winner.

By: stet

stet — Mon, 03 Jul 2006 17:06:40 -0800

Speaking of metadata, I can't help but wonder if a faceted approach to porn would be effective. We could work with an audience facet (gay, straight, male, female), a performer gender facet, performer age facet, number of participants facet, type of activity facet, and so forth. Add in a Flamenco or NCSU style browsing system and you'd be in the money. Furthermore, applying vocabulary control and synonym rings would greatly aid recall. No more wondering if you should search on "blowjob," "head," "oral," or "hummer." Add the less popular names as entry terms and you'll get the whole lot! The level of pre-coordination vs. post-coordination will have to be decided, probably by user studies and research into pornography seeking behavior, but I'm sure I just read something in JASIST about that last issue. I should email Michael Gorman right now. In your face, Cortex!

By: jessamyn

jessamyn — Mon, 03 Jul 2006 17:38:58 -0800

I see a future niche for you, stet. I'm sad that my ten.com login stopped working, they had the most advanced porn search engine that I have ever seen before or since. You could search by number of participants, gender of participants, rough age ranges, type of sex act, location of sex act, props, as well as the more prosaic actor/director stuff. Plus, you could Boolean all of it. Kitchen 3-ways. Girl on girl on guy airplane scenarios. Seniors in schoolyards. Damn.

By: daHIFI

daHIFI — Mon, 03 Jul 2006 18:01:03 -0800

Wow! I don't know which MeFi I like more, the conspiracy charged liberal conservative bashing nut-in-the-whitehouse MeFi; it's-friday-have-some-time-wasting-Flash MeFi or the here's-some-porno-on-the-front-door MeFi! Really the Severina Vuckovic one was pretty nice, and the Wiki page on her is pretty interesting as well... Apparently she made the tape with some married dude after gaining fame as a wholesome Croatian pop star while promoting abstinence and morals. Dirty... dirty... On the other hand I do see rinkjustice's point; this has been the most explicit front page post I've ever seen on the Blue, but that's just life.

By: keptwench

keptwench — Mon, 03 Jul 2006 18:01:53 -0800

majick: The reason some of the clips are only 30 seconds is because that's how long some guys last before... well, you know. *wicked grin*

By: stet

stet — Mon, 03 Jul 2006 18:02:43 -0800

Heh. Ten.com is great! The structure of their taxonomy is pretty good, and I like the way they expose the hierarchy to the user. I'm more than a little frustrated that I won't be able to use the site as an example at work. Once again, adult content pioneers innovation on the web. Man, library school really does apply to the real world.

By: It's Raining Florence Henderson

It's Raining Florence Henderson — Mon, 03 Jul 2006 18:06:01 -0800

Please. No more taxonomy without reprazentation.

By: econous

econous — Mon, 03 Jul 2006 20:13:24 -0800

My erection has failed me. Yet again it simply will not be satisfied till it views a pair of cats fighting on youtube. If only it could type instead of talking loudly in public, or simply just cum.

By: cortex

cortex — Mon, 03 Jul 2006 20:19:30 -0800

*asks reference desk for Italian-English dictionary* *declares vendetta on stet*

By: NationalKato

NationalKato — Mon, 03 Jul 2006 20:23:43 -0800

So, did anyone here climax?

By: Smedleyman

Smedleyman — Mon, 03 Jul 2006 20:24:56 -0800

Thanks, BrotherCaine. Just curious *ahem* yeah, uh, purely academic *shifts eyes* *adjusts raincoat* "But why not 46, or 38 or other similar breast size numbers?" - posted by jessamyn Two fours look like breasteses. 44. And 'PP' has different sexual connotations. ...not that I uh *AHEM* know anything about that. I, uh...have. to. go... Heh heh, I'm just kidding. I love porn.

By: BrotherCaine

BrotherCaine — Mon, 03 Jul 2006 21:24:54 -0800

I read that wikipedia article on Severina. I'm so sure the sex tape was accidentally leaked, uh-huh.

By: loquacious

loquacious — Mon, 03 Jul 2006 22:05:40 -0800

So, did anyone here climax? I'm saving mine for World Orgasm Day.

By: drstein

drstein — Mon, 03 Jul 2006 22:26:43 -0800

Hrm. Isn't pornotube going to be in trouble for not having a USC 2257 statement? I didn't see anything on the site to indicate that they were ensuring that the hosers in the videos were actually over 18 years of age. Won't that come back to bite them? (I'm surprised that none of you guys brought that up yet)

By: Smedleyman

Smedleyman — Mon, 03 Jul 2006 23:12:17 -0800

Hey! Pornotube is going to be in trouble for not having a USC 2257....aw

By: jokeefe

jokeefe — Tue, 04 Jul 2006 00:11:30 -0800

Hmmm. It never ceases to surprise me just how unarousing, detached, and cold most porn is. I mean, considering how big a part it plays in many people's sex lives.

By: nickyskye

nickyskye — Tue, 04 Jul 2006 01:43:07 -0800

And then there's cornography. Smut!

By: loquacious

loquacious — Wed, 05 Jul 2006 02:23:44 -0800

Hmmm. It never ceases to surprise me just how unarousing, detached, and cold most porn is. I mean, considering how big a part it plays in many people's sex lives. Shh! Less talk, more rubbing together of the wibbly bits.

By: dubold

dubold — Wed, 05 Jul 2006 10:36:34 -0800

Heh heh, I'm just kidding. I love porn. so does this guy. (nsfw) the drawback with all the video upload sites available is that there's no regulation of content. The upside is that this fine gentleman can now let his desires be known.

By: raedyn

raedyn — Mon, 10 Jul 2006 12:23:55 -0800

considering how big a part it plays in many people's sex lives. - jokeefe Do you call it your sex life when it's solo? Yes, I know many couples use porn as a part of their shared sex life. But it had honestly never occured to me to refer to masturbation as part of 'sex life'.