<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
    xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
     xmlns:admin="http://webns.net/mvcb/"
     xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
     xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#">
	<channel> 

	<title>Comments on: Comments on 5296</title>
	<link>http://www.metafilter.com/5296//</link>
	<description>Comments on MetaFilter post Comments on 5296</description>
	<pubDate>Mon, 15 Jan 2001 20:07:30 -0800</pubDate>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 15 Jan 2001 20:07:30 -0800</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en-us</language>
	<docs>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/tech/rss</docs>
	<ttl>60</ttl>

	<item>
		<title>Post number 5296</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/5296/</link>	
		<description>&lt;a href="http://archpedi.ama-assn.org/issues/current/rfull/poa00191.html"&gt;tv = agressive behavior in children.&lt;/a&gt; &lt;br&gt;&lt;small&gt;Danny: What was the Donner Party?
Jack: They were a party of settlers in covered-wagon times. They got snowbound one winter in the mountains. They had to resort to cannibalism in order to stay alive.&lt;br&gt;
Danny: You mean they ate each other up?&lt;br&gt;
Jack: They had to, in order to survive.&lt;br&gt;
Wendy: Jack...&lt;br&gt;
Danny: Don&apos;t worry, Mom. I know all about cannibalism. I saw it on TV. &lt;br&gt;
Jack: See, it&apos;s OK. He saw it on the television.&lt;/small&gt;
</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">post:www.metafilter.com,2001:site.5296</guid>
		<pubDate>Mon, 15 Jan 2001 19:48:58 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>tiaka</dc:creator>		<category>brokenlinks</category>		<category>deadlinks</category>		<category>media</category>		<category>television</category>		<category>children</category>		<category>violence</category>		<category>aggression</category>		<category>TV</category>		<category>psychology</category>		<category>parenting</category>		<category>cannabilism</category>
	</item>	<item>
		<title>By: rodii</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/5296/#41707</link>	
		<description>Maybe I&apos;m missing the talking point here.

What is the dialogue from? (Sorry if this reveals my cluelessness)</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:www.metafilter.com,2001:site.5296-41707</guid>
		<pubDate>Mon, 15 Jan 2001 20:07:30 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>rodii</dc:creator>
	</item>	<item>
		<title>By: Dirjy</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/5296/#41732</link>	
		<description>It&apos;s from &apos;The Shining.&apos;

You need to watch more TV, rodii! 
[/me punches rodii in the face]</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:www.metafilter.com,2001:site.5296-41732</guid>
		<pubDate>Mon, 15 Jan 2001 21:46:22 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Dirjy</dc:creator>
	</item>	<item>
		<title>By: rodii</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/5296/#41735</link>	
		<description>Shoulda known there was a Kubrick angle.
[/me pummels dirjy with a copy of &lt;i&gt;A Clockwork Orange&lt;/i&gt;]

(By the way (offtopic) is the aforementioned film still banned in the UK?)</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:www.metafilter.com,2001:site.5296-41735</guid>
		<pubDate>Mon, 15 Jan 2001 21:53:57 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>rodii</dc:creator>
	</item>	<item>
		<title>By: tiaka</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/5296/#41737</link>	
		<description>No, it was never banned. Kubrick felt it shouldn&apos;t have been shown in the UK. I&apos;m not sure what the reasons were, but I feel it had something to do with like a gizzilion death threats he received after the first release. heh.


By the way, that last quote should have read - &apos;Jack: See, it&apos;s OK. He saw it on the &lt;i&gt;television&lt;/i&gt;&apos;; the emphasis being on the television word. Think about it.</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:www.metafilter.com,2001:site.5296-41737</guid>
		<pubDate>Mon, 15 Jan 2001 22:02:52 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>tiaka</dc:creator>
	</item>	<item>
		<title>By: Markb</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/5296/#41760</link>	
		<description>There was a supposed copycat incident I believe.  A tramp (hobo?) was attacked and set alight, the newspapers siezed on the similarity between the real-life and film events and called for the film to be banned because of this.  Kubrick had the film pulled from release in the UK though later there was some doubt as to whether the attackers had even seen it.
That&apos;s why it went on general release just after his death, since there was no actual ban other than a self imposed one.</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:www.metafilter.com,2001:site.5296-41760</guid>
		<pubDate>Tue, 16 Jan 2001 00:50:21 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Markb</dc:creator>
	</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
