But what about the first time the roof was built, was that not considered a 'roof job'? that would make this job a tie for the largest roof job, competing with itself.
maybe i am missing something and 'roof job' really means getting a hand job on a roof. yes, in that case, i am with the killer of thirteen.
no it would be larger because they had to tear down the remains THEN reinstall...so it was more work. Yeah..that's gotta be it. posted by evilelvis at 5:05 PM on July 20, 2006
Well presumably largest in terms of budget, manpower, schedule, no? They had to rip up 450,000 sq ft opf existing roof in 180 days. posted by jamesonandwater at 8:21 PM on July 20, 2006
I hope they remembered to clean it inside first. posted by youlikeme at 5:38 PM on July 21, 2006
Well, it's not completely unreasonable to consider the construction of a new roof on a new building not to be a "roof job". posted by baylink at 4:34 PM on July 22, 2006
« Older
"In 2006, the Union of Concerned Scientists (...
| Farmers across the US are incr...
Newer »
This thread has been archived and is closed to new comments
posted by thirteenkiller at 2:08 PM on July 20, 2006