This looks to be a worthwhile series. My only complaint ... and this is petty, perhaps ... is that this first segment is only five short pages. An 11-part series sounds impressive, but I'd prefer a smaller number of larger parts. posted by grabbingsand at 7:15 AM on August 14, 2006
An 11-part series sounds impressive, but I'd prefer a smaller number of larger parts.
My thought exactly. It's a pretty interesting and valuable piece, and I'd love to read more but I'm afraid it's not enough to get me (or the non-regular reader) to come back ten more times.
These drawn out series seem to be an increasing trend on the internerd and a misguided attempt to be more blog-like. I wonder how successful they actually are. posted by pokermonk at 7:25 AM on August 14, 2006
This first segment is only five short pages. An 11-part series sounds impressive, but I'd prefer a smaller number of larger parts.
These drawn out series seem to be an increasing trend on the internerd and a misguided attempt to be more blog-like.
I don't think splitting it up has anything to do with being "more blog-like" or even with the Web at all. It might be only "five short pages" on the Internet, but the Christian Science Monitor is a newspaper first. It's easily fourty or fifty column-inches. And that's a lot of space for a non-news article. posted by Plutor at 8:02 AM on August 14, 2006
posted by grabbingsand at 7:15 AM on August 14, 2006