<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
    xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
     xmlns:admin="http://webns.net/mvcb/"
     xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
     xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#">
	<channel> 

	<title>Comments on: Comments on 5429</title>
	<link>http://www.metafilter.com/5429//</link>
	<description>Comments on MetaFilter post Comments on 5429</description>
	<pubDate>Mon, 22 Jan 2001 20:56:01 -0800</pubDate>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 22 Jan 2001 20:56:01 -0800</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en-us</language>
	<docs>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/tech/rss</docs>
	<ttl>60</ttl>

	<item>
		<title>Post number 5429</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/5429/</link>	
		<description>&lt;a href="http://cryptome.org/gates-paupers.htm"&gt;Bill Gates and 17 paupers appointed&lt;/a&gt; to National Infrastructure Assurance Council.  [ couldn&apos;t beat their lead.  Also from Cryptome.  I&apos;m done now.  :-) ]</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">post:www.metafilter.com,2001:site.5429</guid>
		<pubDate>Mon, 22 Jan 2001 18:05:21 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>baylink</dc:creator>		<category>Cryptome</category>		<category>brokenlink</category>		<category>BillGates</category>		<category>NIAC</category>		<category>NationalInfrastructureAssuranceCouncil</category>
	</item>	<item>
		<title>By: chrish</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/5429/#43917</link>	
		<description>please don&apos;t take this personally, but i don&apos;t get it. i mean --- i understand that bill was appointed to the niac by clinton, but what&apos;s the importance of bill gates being one of the appointees?</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:www.metafilter.com,2001:site.5429-43917</guid>
		<pubDate>Mon, 22 Jan 2001 20:56:01 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>chrish</dc:creator>
	</item>	<item>
		<title>By: baylink</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/5429/#44016</link>	
		<description>Well, different people have different takes on the thing.

My personal one is that I&apos;m uncomfortable having the AntiChrist on any committee that&apos;s supposed to safeguard the country... but I&apos;m sure you could find one or two people on here who think Windows NT is a pretty neat idea.

:-)</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:www.metafilter.com,2001:site.5429-44016</guid>
		<pubDate>Tue, 23 Jan 2001 07:40:36 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>baylink</dc:creator>
	</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
