$15,000 vs. $12.99 for a 12-pack of 2-ply.
September 15, 2006 2:13 PM   Subscribe

 
Wow, that's some amazing work on the winner. Although, truth be told I wouldn't mind seeing that model OUT of her tp wedding dress. Rawr, if you catch my meaning.
posted by jonson at 2:29 PM on September 15, 2006


Something old, something new, something borrowed, something for me to poop on.
posted by Ambrosia Voyeur at 2:35 PM on September 15, 2006


Hey Beavis, the winner is from "Cumming." Huh huh huh....
posted by tristeza at 2:36 PM on September 15, 2006


Holy shit. Those are amazing.
posted by rossination at 2:37 PM on September 15, 2006


lol metaphor
posted by Baby_Balrog at 2:38 PM on September 15, 2006


The quilted one is cute.
posted by PY at 2:38 PM on September 15, 2006


OH THERE'S A LOT OF TOILET PAPER ON THAT ONE AND YOU KNOW WHICH ONE I MEAN ESPECIALLY COMPARED TO THE OTHERS DON'T CRUCIFY ME

Toilet paper wedding dresses, though? Who the hell is going to buy one of those? Kitchen towels would be way more practical.
posted by NinjaTadpole at 2:38 PM on September 15, 2006


Also the winner of a toilet tissue competition is from Cumming.
posted by NinjaTadpole at 2:41 PM on September 15, 2006


Boy, get me my (squirt) gun.
posted by Kickstart70 at 2:41 PM on September 15, 2006


The second place winner's dress is impressive.

That Just Toilet Paper link at the bottom of the page has some very, uh, interesting TP for sale.
posted by skilletfish at 2:43 PM on September 15, 2006


previous year's winners
posted by PY at 2:45 PM on September 15, 2006


It would be a real disaster if the weddings got rained out
posted by Holy foxy moxie batman! at 2:46 PM on September 15, 2006 [1 favorite]


Those models look a little flushed.
posted by brain_drain at 2:46 PM on September 15, 2006


I agree, skilletfish. It made me think of origami. Ha ha, b_d.
posted by PY at 2:50 PM on September 15, 2006


"The 2006 Toilet Paper Wedding Dress Contest Winner Is...... Stephanie Stutzenberger of Cumming, Ga."

Yeah, I know the joke's kinda been made, but...

Geez, they sure do seem to use a lot of toilet paper down there in Cumming.
posted by koeselitz at 2:51 PM on September 15, 2006


And here's a round of applause for the marketing geniuses behind AssSpamTM.
posted by maryh at 2:52 PM on September 15, 2006


And here's a round of applause for the marketing geniuses behind AssSpamTM.
posted by maryh


What kind of genius would have his company name/logo on something that people literally wipe their asses on?
posted by leftcoastbob at 2:57 PM on September 15, 2006


Why, oh dear lord, why? That 2nd place finisher must have blown 100 hours putting that together. Somewhere, Joe Bob Briggs is weeping.
posted by toma at 2:59 PM on September 15, 2006


These are awesome!!! The ones from this year are so impressive, suprisingly fashionable. And the ones from last year are ... Well, they're funny.
posted by ClaudiaCenter at 3:13 PM on September 15, 2006


If Mr. Whipple's bride wore one of these, she really would be his main squeeze....
posted by rob511 at 3:17 PM on September 15, 2006


It would be a real disaster if the weddings got rained out

More than that, it'd be ironic.
posted by hangashore at 3:27 PM on September 15, 2006


Second place got robbed. All that folding!!
posted by hilatron at 3:28 PM on September 15, 2006


These dresses are like something out of Star Trek.

Because the go to Uranus to wipe out the Klingons.
posted by Astro Zombie at 3:31 PM on September 15, 2006


too bad this thread was closed.
posted by snofoam at 3:32 PM on September 15, 2006


shit... my retinas...
posted by NinjaTadpole at 3:45 PM on September 15, 2006


GAH! BLINDNESS IS WORSE THAN I FEARED!
posted by koeselitz at 4:08 PM on September 15, 2006


Sure, they posed in the dresses, but how can we be sure they were married in them?
posted by kenko at 4:18 PM on September 15, 2006


Who on earth would do all that work for a crummy $500?
posted by WaterSprite at 4:50 PM on September 15, 2006


They are impressive, though. But just think, you have to rip them off and ruin them. Oh, maybe I'm just too pragmatic.
posted by WaterSprite at 4:51 PM on September 15, 2006


Watersprite, after you tear them off you can use them for ... you know ... so you're not really wasting anything!
posted by Quietgal at 5:20 PM on September 15, 2006


Wow, the people who made these dresses are crazy talented with tp.
posted by Vindaloo at 5:41 PM on September 15, 2006


second place got ROBBED!
posted by delmoi at 5:44 PM on September 15, 2006


Seriously. The 2nd place design is much, much better than the 1st place design.
posted by bob sarabia at 6:12 PM on September 15, 2006


No way. Second place is way too ornate. Who needs all those folds and whatnot going in every direction?
posted by kenko at 6:31 PM on September 15, 2006


I never thought that anyone could consider that a wedding dress made out of toilet paper was "way too ornate."
posted by leftcoastbob at 7:45 PM on September 15, 2006


Is that double ply?
posted by catseatcheese at 8:40 PM on September 15, 2006


It's like RAY-eee-ain, ... on your wedding day
And your WAY-er-ing, ... toilet paper today

And It's Scotts, not Charmin.
posted by longsleeves at 8:56 PM on September 15, 2006


*falls out of chair laughing*

This is so great, thanks!
posted by mediareport at 10:16 PM on September 15, 2006


I liked the 2nd place better than the first. But that's also because I'm not that fond of the first place dress's style when actually done in fabric, either.
posted by jb at 3:56 AM on September 16, 2006


I want to see the wedding of a Toilet Paper bride with a Duct Tape groom.
posted by cenoxo at 8:42 AM on September 16, 2006


LOL DID ANYONE NOTICE THE WINNERZ DRESS WAS FROM CUMMING LOL!
posted by ORthey at 9:06 AM on September 16, 2006


I wonder if any got married in the Cumming First Methodist Church?
posted by Citizen Premier at 6:01 PM on September 16, 2006


It was all quite, er, charmin'.
posted by clevershark at 1:40 AM on September 17, 2006


« Older The Finest of Worksongs   |   Better Than Linguo Newer »


This thread has been archived and is closed to new comments