Comments on: Baby Toupee

Baby Toupee

triv — Wed, 27 Sep 2006 11:39:50 -0800

Baby Toupee - because parents care about prematernal hair loss.

By: bim

bim — Wed, 27 Sep 2006 11:44:49 -0800

Prematernal? What's that?

By: NationalKato

NationalKato — Wed, 27 Sep 2006 11:45:30 -0800

If you read the 'About Us' section, you'll see that the company isn't concerned - nor do they think parents are - about 'prematernal hair loss.' The company’s goal is to bring creative and fun products to market that make parenting a little more fun, all while bringing a smile to the face of their children. Life is too short to take seriously… have fun with your baby!

By: mcstayinskool

mcstayinskool — Wed, 27 Sep 2006 11:53:06 -0800

strangely, also available as a fake advertisement on SNL

By: triv

triv — Wed, 27 Sep 2006 11:53:10 -0800

bim/NationalKato - I made the word up. I was freestyling on the nature of the piece.

By: bim

bim — Wed, 27 Sep 2006 11:53:17 -0800

I'm saying that prematernal isn't even a word, dude. I've heard of prenatal but prematernal doesn't even make sense. Why not just say: Baby Toupee -- silly but cute pics of kids?

By: blue_beetle

blue_beetle — Wed, 27 Sep 2006 11:57:45 -0800

maternal: in reference to the mother or the state of being a mother premateral: in reference to state before becoming a mother.

By: hermitosis

hermitosis — Wed, 27 Sep 2006 12:34:44 -0800

Started looking for quotes from "Designing Women" about baby wigs. Got bogged down here. Took a while to come back up for air.

By: Kickstart70

Kickstart70 — Wed, 27 Sep 2006 12:37:14 -0800

This is pretty cool. :) My daughter (3 mos) is taking after her mother who was very slow to grow hair. Not that I am worried about it (she's cute as all hell), but it's still funny to think about putting on her head.

By: jennaratrix

jennaratrix — Wed, 27 Sep 2006 12:40:37 -0800

You know, I'm not usually one to say anything, but there's been an awful lot of MeFi/Fark overlap lately. Single-link post to something posted on Fark yesterday? Meh.

By: diastematic

diastematic — Wed, 27 Sep 2006 12:42:21 -0800

I loved The Donald as seen in the gallery. But $25? Nuh-uh.

By: porpoise

porpoise — Wed, 27 Sep 2006 12:43:54 -0800

So that's what Tomkat's kid was wearing...

By: maryh

maryh — Wed, 27 Sep 2006 12:54:30 -0800

Suri is modeling the "Robert Smith."

By: hal9k

hal9k — Wed, 27 Sep 2006 13:07:37 -0800

What, they were having trouble making play dates for these kids? Post-natal drip here needs a spark of confidence? Brilliant. Just wait till junior coughs up a hairball.

By: jpburns

jpburns — Wed, 27 Sep 2006 13:49:38 -0800

This is like dressing up dogs, but sillier...

By: gigawhat?

gigawhat? — Wed, 27 Sep 2006 14:22:17 -0800

Don't let this: happen to your little bundle of joy.

By: diastematic

diastematic — Wed, 27 Sep 2006 14:28:05 -0800

What the Fish from Barney Miller look doesn't do it for you? Come on.

By: 2sheets

2sheets — Wed, 27 Sep 2006 14:41:30 -0800

the dreads are kind of disgusting

By: RubberHen

RubberHen — Wed, 27 Sep 2006 15:07:11 -0800

Funny, I had thought of this as a goofy idea a while back, thought it was novel, only to be beat down to reality by a googling. I promptly removed the idea and subsequent sketches for it had been "done." I wonder how their business will do. Where is the Einstein?

By: ColdChef

ColdChef — Wed, 27 Sep 2006 18:43:39 -0800

Mr. T?

By: nea7

nea7 — Fri, 29 Sep 2006 00:31:53 -0800

Sweet Babies, but a really silly idea. $24,99 - outch.