I mostly am familiar with Breker because of his work with Yukio Mishima. posted by absalom at 1:42 PM on November 6, 2006
Why am I not surprised he associated himself with Mishima...birds of a feather. I loved this interview, it was combative and illuminating. They also have an interview with Neo Rauch, one of my favorite artists. posted by Falconetti at 2:42 PM on November 6, 2006
Yep, that was the best interview I've read in a long time. And I do love me a good interview. Fascinating stuff, thanks Rumple. posted by stinkycheese at 6:24 PM on November 6, 2006
When I was recently in Rome the statues by Bernini did not strike me as terribly different from Breker; Brekers statues have just a little more bloated muscles, they are a little more preposterously virile and adamant. But not a lot. posted by jouke at 11:24 PM on November 6, 2006
Two things stand out (for me) in the interview. One: Breker's not-so-subtle blaming of Speer for the monumental grotesqueries of the Third Reich. (Speer himself blames their monstrous proportions on Hitler.) Two: Breker seems to attribute the squared, stiff poses of his figures to Northern tradition: "...the kind of relaxed stance we find among the Italians, it never existed among northern peoples. Christianity expunged the motif of the supporting and non-supporting leg, because it called the worldly sphere into doubt, transporting it to another plane. " He does not explain why he felt the necessity to carry on this medieval concept. The "supporting and non-supporting leg" rehanchement is, according to Kenneth Clark, the design basis for nude sculpture in the West. Comparing Bernini and Breker, the Baroque and the neo-Gothic, is interesting up to a point. They are both flamboyant but Breker could never have done anything as delicious as this. posted by CCBC at 3:33 PM on November 7, 2006
« Older
This video about the history of petroleum industry...
| my3cents.com...
Newer »
This thread has been archived and is closed to new comments
posted by absalom at 1:42 PM on November 6, 2006