Comments on: Smokin!

Smokin!

joelf — Fri, 24 Nov 2006 21:20:19 -0800

More than 700 Trillion BEEDIES or BIRI are smoked annually
Indians smoke more than one trillion bidis every year.
An experienced worker can roll 2,000 a day.

Step inside and learn more about these unrealistic stats!

By: joelf

joelf — Fri, 24 Nov 2006 21:20:52 -0800

India has about 1 billion people in it. If every man, woman and child, smoke 1 trillion a year That's 1000 smokes per person a year, or 2.7 a day. It takes 1 person 1 day to make 2000 bidis. So if they smoke 2.7 billion a day it would take 1.3 million workers rolling 2000 a day just to meet demand in their own country. But it gets weirder. The world demand is 700 trillion a year. If he population of the earth is 7 billion people everyone would have to smoke 100 thousand a year or 1.9 trillion per day. So if the world smokes 1.9 trillion a day it would take 1 billion people rolling 2000 a day to keep up with the demand of everyone on the planet smoking their 274 daily bidis.

By: Kwantsar

Kwantsar — Fri, 24 Nov 2006 21:23:52 -0800

Your arithmetic is the stuff of legends, joelf.

By: duende

duende — Fri, 24 Nov 2006 21:26:06 -0800

So... if the statistics are clearly erroneous... and you point them out yourself, as an indicator of the site's lack of credibility... then why post this [single] link?

By: jimmy

jimmy — Fri, 24 Nov 2006 21:26:43 -0800

this is a really bad post.

By: flapjax at midnite

flapjax at midnite — Fri, 24 Nov 2006 21:27:03 -0800

uh, joelf... is there any other reason besides, um, bad math that you've made this FPP? I'm just genuinely curious.

By: undule

undule — Fri, 24 Nov 2006 21:27:31 -0800

And a bidi is simply an extraflavored cigarette?

By: ColdChef

ColdChef — Fri, 24 Nov 2006 21:32:03 -0800

Looks like I picked the wrong week to stop smoking 700 Trillion BEEDIES.

By: joelf

joelf — Fri, 24 Nov 2006 21:32:29 -0800

is there any other reason besides, um, bad math that you've made this FPP? I'm just genuinely curious. not really! I was googling around fot giant numbers and found that page. I thought it was funny enough to share.

By: delmoi

delmoi — Fri, 24 Nov 2006 21:32:46 -0800

India has about 1 billion people in it. If every man, woman and child, smoke 1 trillion a year That's 1000 smokes per person a year, or 2.7 a day Wow, that's some crazy-ass math. 1 trillion = 1000, and there are only 700 people in India! (and 700 = 1 billion). I believe that is the craziest ass math I have ever seen in my life. I think you've been putting the wrong stuff in your Beedies. If you're wondering, the real math works out to 700,000 smokes per person per year, or about 2000 a day. The number smoked and the number rolled must be the same, and so the number of smokes rolled per day per person is equal to the number smoked per day, divided by N where N is the portion of the population who works rolling smokes. (so if have the population rolled smokes, N would be 0.5, and each person would have to roll 4,000 a day).

By: facetious

facetious — Fri, 24 Nov 2006 21:34:02 -0800

at this moment more than 700 trillion mefi users are reminiscing about the animated gif.

By: BeerFilter

BeerFilter — Fri, 24 Nov 2006 21:34:44 -0800

Only 274 bidis a day? Pussies. I go through 274 lighters a day.

By: orbis23

orbis23 — Fri, 24 Nov 2006 21:35:04 -0800

Maybe... just MAYBE they meant 700 million instead of 700 trillion? Such mistakes are common when the US system of numbering is somewhat different than the British system (thousands of millions vs. billions). If the author was educated in India, as seems likely, then he may have gotten confused trying to "convert" to US numbering. ... or maybe it's just a typo... Either way, get a grip, man.

By: IronLizard

IronLizard — Fri, 24 Nov 2006 21:35:04 -0800

This is find a site to point at and laugh day (apparently).

By: flapjax at midnite

flapjax at midnite — Fri, 24 Nov 2006 21:40:26 -0800

the real math works out to 700,000 smokes per person per year, or about 2000 a day. The number smoked and the number rolled must be the same, and so the number of smokes rolled per day per person is equal to the number smoked per day, divided by N where N is the portion of the population who works rolling smokes. (so if have the population rolled smokes, N would be 0.5, and each person would have to roll 4,000 a day). That's very good, delmoi. And now, let's open your spelling book!

By: joelf

joelf — Fri, 24 Nov 2006 21:41:07 -0800

I don't think the math on the wacky stats is wrong... a trillion divided by 1000 is a billion ... according to google

By: dhartung

dhartung — Fri, 24 Nov 2006 21:43:16 -0800

If you are smoking a bidi in a train from Delhi to Mumbai, and your friend is smoking a bidi in a train from Mumbai to Delhi, and both train engineers and all the conductors are smoking bidis ...

By: Nothing

Nothing — Fri, 24 Nov 2006 21:44:22 -0800

The math is fine. The writing is a little crazy, and strangely organized, but the math works. "If every man, woman and child, smoke 1 trillion a year That's 1000 smokes per person a year, or 2.7 a day" Read as: "According to the statistics, Indians smoke 1 trillion a year. If every man, woman, and child in India was a smoker, that comes out to 1000 per person per year, or 2.7 smokes for each person per day.

By: scheptech

scheptech — Fri, 24 Nov 2006 21:45:47 -0800

Such mistakes are common when the US system of numbering is somewhat different than the British system Such mistakes are common during an herbal high.

By: joelf

joelf — Fri, 24 Nov 2006 21:51:15 -0800

The writing is a little crazy, and strangely organized That charm's just part of me

By: quin

quin — Fri, 24 Nov 2006 22:01:44 -0800

Oh for the love of Darkness, just tell me how me how many cigars I need to smoke. I mean, I'm bad at math, I always have been. But if you need to get your statistics, I'm more than willing to help. So what is it, a billion, a trillion, what? I'm assuming, of course that someone else is paying for this right? Because if you are looking to keep me in smokes for research, it just doesn't seem fair that I should have to pay. I'm just sayin' is all.

By: quin

quin — Fri, 24 Nov 2006 22:08:17 -0800

Such mistakes are common when the US system of numbering is somewhat different than the British system And yeah, really? By now we, as an English speaking community, can't come together and come up with a name for a number that isn't exponentially different from another name for a different number? Or the same number. Or whatever? As I've indicated. I'm bad at math, but I tell you what, given the choice between a British million and an American billion, I'm always going to take the billion. And the vice-versa is the same, I would be more than happy to take the first British billion offered to me. Seriously, I'm broke. Someone offer me some money.

By: Ynoxas

Ynoxas — Fri, 24 Nov 2006 22:10:40 -0800

America consumes almost 380 billion cigarettes per year, so the 1 trillion per year for India is either way, way, way low or Indians show much more restraint than americans. In the US, about 45 million smokers smoked those 380 billion cigarettes, which works out to about 8500 per smoker per year, which is about a pack a day (20 per pack), which is probably pretty reasonable. It is not known how many bidis are smoked in america, but they contain more nicotine, tar, and CO than regular cigarettes. They are certainly not "less harmful" than other forms of tobacco.

By: cell divide

cell divide — Fri, 24 Nov 2006 22:17:49 -0800

wow you people are bad at math. The real number is that every Indian smokes approximately 500 million bidies per day, and over 45 billion are rolled every day by 500 million workers, who also smoke an additional 400 billion bidies per year.

By: cortex

cortex — Fri, 24 Nov 2006 22:18:38 -0800

DJ bidi!

By: flapjax at midnite

flapjax at midnite — Fri, 24 Nov 2006 22:19:12 -0800

They are certainly not "less harmful" than other forms of tobacco. Yeah, I'd think not, cause they're really pretty harsh tasting. Used to smoke 'em sometimes back in my teenage, cause I thought they could maybe get you a little high (a little sick is mre like it) and for the exoticism of smoking some little spliff-looking thing from mysterious India.

By: turducken

turducken — Fri, 24 Nov 2006 22:30:46 -0800

Bidi Bidi Bidi.

By: Eideteker

Eideteker — Fri, 24 Nov 2006 22:56:52 -0800

That's a lotta cancer.

By: loquacious

loquacious — Fri, 24 Nov 2006 22:57:19 -0800

Bidi Bidi Bidi. What's up, Duck?

By: Chuckles

Chuckles — Fri, 24 Nov 2006 23:30:16 -0800

D Buck

By: joelf

joelf — Fri, 24 Nov 2006 23:56:58 -0800

What I understood was: a million is 1000 x 1000 a billion is 1000 x million a trillion is 1000 x billion is this different in England?

By: Jon Mitchell

Jon Mitchell — Sat, 25 Nov 2006 00:22:22 -0800

As I understood it growing up in England: a million = 1000*1000 a billion = 1000000 * 1000000 a trillion = 1000000 * 1000000 * 1000000 I think we just use the american system now, though.

By: cedar

cedar — Sat, 25 Nov 2006 00:30:26 -0800

Two things... what the hell is a bidi and you do know, that Puff, was not a dragon. No magic. None. Damn, I really should have read this thread.

By: Jimbob

Jimbob — Sat, 25 Nov 2006 00:37:55 -0800

Aaah, carefree lunch breaks smoking beedies behind the sports shed...

By: bhouston

bhouston — Sat, 25 Nov 2006 00:38:38 -0800

According to Wikipedia, "the gold standard for factual knowledge", 800 billion beedis are smoked each year in India.

By: sourwookie

sourwookie — Sat, 25 Nov 2006 00:46:28 -0800

Are there that many dried grape leaves?

By: maryh

maryh — Sat, 25 Nov 2006 03:33:50 -0800

A co-worker of mine brought me back a pack of bidis from India, and another co-worker insisted that the proper way to smoke them was lit end inside the mouth, inhaling deeply through the unfiltered, unlit portion outside one's lips. My question: She was trying to kill me, right?

By: Kirth Gerson

Kirth Gerson — Sat, 25 Nov 2006 03:33:55 -0800

quin, I left a dollar under the doormat. A US dollar, not one of those British ones.

By: Kirth Gerson

Kirth Gerson — Sat, 25 Nov 2006 03:36:10 -0800

maryh, did she have you take a mouthful of Lavoris first? No? Then she was only trying to maim you.

By: maryh

maryh — Sat, 25 Nov 2006 03:46:27 -0800

Kirth Gerson- I can only pray that when The End comes for me, it's blazingly and mintily fresh. But sadly, I see this as a friendly maiming, not a death smoke.

By: jonmc

jonmc — Sat, 25 Nov 2006 04:48:21 -0800

*cough*

By: toma

toma — Sat, 25 Nov 2006 04:49:48 -0800

More than 700 Trillion BEEDIES or BIRI are smoked annually. Indians smoke more than one trillion bidis every year. India's got, what, one billion people? One sixth earth's total? And they're responsible for 1 out of the 700 trillion annually? What--bidi smoking's now an Indian capital crime? Such a stark reminder of the blessings of freedom, what a shame. As I wiped a tear from my face, I looked down only to see that I was smoking 99,000 bidis. Goose-bump moment.

By: pyramid termite

pyramid termite — Sat, 25 Nov 2006 05:11:51 -0800

you people don't have time to type out all this ... get to smoking and get your quota taken care of!

By: elpapacito

elpapacito — Sat, 25 Nov 2006 05:40:28 -0800

joelf: stop using your brian so evidently ! You'll make dumb people uncomfortable and make them think about things such as , umh, rights and divisions while they only understand addition and subtraction !

By: jonmc

jonmc — Sat, 25 Nov 2006 05:47:05 -0800

bidibidibidi...

By: jack_mo

jack_mo — Sat, 25 Nov 2006 05:59:46 -0800

I think we just use the american system now, though. Yeah, we officially use the échelle courte (short scale, where 10⁹, or a thousand millions, is a billion) nowadays, though only since 1974, which means colloquially many people use the échelle longue (long scale, where 10¹², or a million millions, is a billion). The poncey French terms are down to that country converting from the long scale to the short in the 19th Century, which America copied, before switching back to, and continuing to use, the long scale, which America didn't copy. In India things are muddled further, though, because as well as using the 'old British' system colloquially and the 'new British' system officially, there's a completely separate Indian scale, which doesn't have a word for a trillion in the short scale sense of the word, though arab means a (short scale) billion, which means it wouldn't mean the same as a billion to your average Indian, though it might mean a billion in an official Indian government document. Confused? Don't get me started on the use of the milliard, obsolete in the UK, but still in use in Europe and Scandinavia where the long scale is used officially (a milliard is a thousand millions, ie. the same as a billion in the short scale sense, or an arab in the Indian system). In short: the French are to blame. Or the Americans, for copying the French. Or the British and her English-speaking former colonies are to blame, for officially copying the Americans copying the French, but colloquially retaining the original (and current) French usage. The solution: no one should ever use the word 'billion' ever again.

By: dirtynumbangelboy

dirtynumbangelboy — Sat, 25 Nov 2006 06:08:51 -0800

delmoi writes "I believe that is the craziest ass math I have ever seen in my life. I think you've been putting the wrong stuff in your Beedies." I believe he has been putting the right stuff in his bidis.

By: furtive

furtive — Sat, 25 Nov 2006 06:18:39 -0800

Square One: Fat Boys - One Billion Is Big (youtube)

By: pracowity

pracowity — Sat, 25 Nov 2006 06:27:39 -0800

If all the Indian women in the world were laid end to end, that would be smokin'!

By: craven_morhead

craven_morhead — Sat, 25 Nov 2006 07:10:44 -0800

*lights up*

By: The Bellman

The Bellman — Sat, 25 Nov 2006 07:24:08 -0800

No one has really commented on it, but Ynoxas' comment is truly astounding to me. I had no idea the numbers were anything like that big!

By: DenOfSizer

DenOfSizer — Sat, 25 Nov 2006 07:38:10 -0800

Let's put it into Indian terms: A Lakh is one hundred thousand and a crore is ten million, so 700 trillion would be 70,000,000 crore bidis, right? When you think about it it's not so amazing. A bidi's smokable (if you can even get it lit) for about 15 seconds, whereupon it usually disintegrates. this is a really bad post. Yeah, what it needed was a UTube Link, eh?

By: kozad

kozad — Sat, 25 Nov 2006 09:33:51 -0800

Seriously, though, that's how I stopped smoking. By switching from Raleighs to bidis. You just couldn't smoke too many of those noxious little things a day to keep your nicotine habit buzzing along.

By: porpoise

porpoise — Sat, 25 Nov 2006 09:48:10 -0800

Système International d'Unités But then again, the "officials" publicly state, The SI is not static but evolves to match the world's increasingly demanding requirements for measurement. grrrr Now don't get me started on calories, Calorie, and Joules.

By: Talanvor

Talanvor — Sat, 25 Nov 2006 12:41:30 -0800

Good god, how do they know how big their hard drives are now then? And how much pr0n can you fit on a milliard?

By: fixedgear

fixedgear — Sat, 25 Nov 2006 14:12:13 -0800

I smell something burning.

By: dirtynumbangelboy

dirtynumbangelboy — Sat, 25 Nov 2006 18:11:46 -0800

furtive writes "Square One: Fat Boys - One Billion Is Big (youtube)" Oh my God I used to love that show as a kid.

By: RubberHen

RubberHen — Sat, 25 Nov 2006 18:40:44 -0800

Rather than a billion -- I suggest a gazillion Bidis might be apropos.

By: Laotic

Laotic — Sun, 26 Nov 2006 01:48:31 -0800

Good god, how do they know how big their hard drives are now then? And how much pr0n can you fit on a milliard? Talanvor, you mean on a milliardbyte harddrive? Not much. but I'm sure you can get a decent one for a kilorupee or two.

By: tehloki

tehloki — Sun, 26 Nov 2006 02:51:37 -0800

Metafilter needs some kind of meta-calculator or something, that checks the math in your post and does something horrible to you if it's as whacked-out and inconsistent as joelf's.

By: ryanrs

ryanrs — Mon, 27 Nov 2006 00:13:21 -0800

sliderule.jpg Actually, you don't even need one of those. Just memorize a few simple numbers. You should already know the multiplication table through 12. You probably already know reciprocals through 1/10, except 1/7 and maybe 1/6 (0.142857 and 0.1666). The powers of 2 from -4 through 16 are also useful, but you probably don't know them unless you're a programmer. You can avoid division by learning to do prime factorizations quickly. Multiples of 2 and 5 are easy to recognize. Multiples of 3 are also easy to recognize since the digital sum will be a multiple of 3 (eg 513 is a multiple of 3 since 5+1+3=9). Pulling out the 2s, 3s, and 5s will make most large numbers tractable. Uncooperative numbers can be adjusted +-1: 143=12*12, 133=11*11 (or 4*3*11 if you're a programmer). Once you start thinking in terms of logarithms and factorizations you'll find mental arithmetic much easier. (On preview, the above is useless if you can't get the order of magnitude right. For fuck's sake, people.)

By: jack_mo

jack_mo — Mon, 27 Nov 2006 04:28:37 -0800

You probably already know reciprocals through 1/10 I don't even know what a reciprocal is.

By: Eideteker

Eideteker — Mon, 27 Nov 2006 06:21:57 -0800

1/^ LOL It's also a feature of grammar. But I think ryanrs means the first kind. A reciprocal/multiplicative inverse is how many things divide into one (or if you divide one thing into that many equal parts, how big each will be proportional to the original object). Often, with tipping, I find it easier to divide by six (1/6 = .166... ~ 17%, and then just round down) than multiply by .15 (technically, I multiply by 15 and divide by 100, but I have been tainted by slide rule training, where you just do the multiplication and worry about the decimals after). Basically, he's saying if you know a few tricks and are willing to approximate, you can do most math in seconds rather than minutes (practice helps). I used to pride myself when I worked in retail on being able to figure the change faster than the register (additive inverses, in that case), at least from a twenty. THE MORE THAN YOU EVER WANTED TO KNOW ===*^

By: PeterMcDermott

PeterMcDermott — Mon, 27 Nov 2006 16:18:29 -0800

If all the Indian women in the world were laid end to end, that would be smokin'! Should they all use the same bidet to clean up with afterwards?