Robot Love
December 7, 2006 2:25 AM Subscribe
Sherry Turkle, who used to believe in the
benefits of robot pets, has changed her tune and now "finds
human-machine love unsettling (
pdf)". Tyrell:"We began to recognize in them a strange obsession. After all, they are emotionally inexperienced, with only a few years in which to store up the experiences which you and I take for granted. If we gift them with a past, we create a cushion or a pillow for their emotions, and consequently, we can control them better." Was he referring to us or
them?
posted by sluglicker (14 comments total)
3 users marked this as a favorite
« Older Pearl Harbor ship salvage... | If chat rooms were real. [You... Newer »
Robots are designed to provide 3 types of effects: psychological, such as relaxation and motivation,
physiological, such as improvement in vital signs, and social effects such as instigating communication
among inpatients and caregivers." But what does that say about us as human Beings? Are all our attachments,
our objets d'amour, merely something we imagine? And if the answer to that question depends on whether or
not there is a real interaction between us and the beloved, if and when AI attains the level of thought and
feeling as we do, does that make any difference? Consider the words of the great robot poet, TB788-E10-D.
posted by sluglicker at 2:27 AM on December 7, 2006