Animators and children's TV creators around the world must see Scooby and ask themselves: Why can't my crappy show become iconic? [...]The real moral was that the monster under the bed is always just some greedy old white businessman. Expose the old white guy and his dollar-grabbing scheme and everything is cool. Fine. Maybe the people who caught the Enron folk grew up on Scooby-Doo. But I couldn't stand the show, myself, not even when I was in the target age range. Bugs was about a thousand times better.
Maybe Scooby's appeal makes sense when you compare it to the rest of kids' TV. The most ham-handed of children's shows try to stuff a moral message down the audience's throat. But the moral code of Scooby-Doo permeates the entire enterprise without you ever noticing it. The Washington Post's Hank Stuever concisely elucidated the "Scooby worldview" when the first live-action movie came out: "Kids should meddle, dogs are sweet, life is groovy, and if something scares you, you should confront it."
« Older Poof and Foop.... | I beheld the earth, and, lo, i... Newer »
This thread has been archived and is closed to new comments
posted by wfrgms at 7:08 AM on January 9, 2007