It could reflect a case in which ancient traits reappear in a modern human, or it could indicate a mixture of populations, Zilhao [one of the paper's authors] said. Or it simply may be that science hasn't been able to study enough early modern people to understand their diversity.But these stories don't go anywhere if someone doesn't overstate the case. Small people, no one cares about. A tribe of "hobbits" gets attention.
It could reflect a case in which ancient traits reappear in a modern human, or it could indicate a mixture of populations, Zilhao said. Or it simply may be that science hasn't been able to study enough early modern people to understand their diversity.Hence the use of the phrase "possibly suggesting."
Artifacts also indicate that modern humans were more fashion-conscious than Neanderthals, who draped themselves with skins.Modern man has thus survived, not due to our technology, but to our superior fashion sense.
Humans adorned themselves with shell beads and pierced fox teeth, and sewed their garments with bone needles, creating looks that may have helped them to distinguish other humans at a distance and determine the group to which they belonged.
Aside from dress, these humans were “fully modern, behaviorally and cognitively,” Adler says. “They were identical to us.”
Neanderthals were not as crude looking as you may think, however, he says. Although they were shorter than we are and had large brow ridges, a Neanderthal man dressed in a suit and tie might walk down the street today without attracting prolonged stares.
« Older Adultery could mean life,... | Still more Ferrofluid fun... Newer »
This thread has been archived and is closed to new comments
And stop calling me.
posted by chillmost at 4:50 AM on January 16, 2007