<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
    xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
     xmlns:admin="http://webns.net/mvcb/"
     xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
     xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#">
	<channel> 

	<title>Comments on: Comments on 5795</title>
	<link>http://www.metafilter.com/5795//</link>
	<description>Comments on MetaFilter post Comments on 5795</description>
	<pubDate>Sun, 11 Feb 2001 09:47:33 -0800</pubDate>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 11 Feb 2001 09:47:33 -0800</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en-us</language>
	<docs>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/tech/rss</docs>
	<ttl>60</ttl>

	<item>
		<title>Post number 5795</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/5795/</link>	
		<description>&lt;a href="http://dailynews.yahoo.com/h/nm/20010211/ts/genome_dc_2.html"&gt;&quot;There are only a few hundred genes that we have in the human genome that are not in the mouse genome,&quot;&lt;/a&gt; says Craig Venter, chief scientific officer at Celera Genomics.  Information on the human genome released today reveals that there are far fewer genes than first thought - humans only have &lt;i&gt;double&lt;/i&gt; the amount that worms and flies do.  [more inside...]</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">post:www.metafilter.com,2001:site.5795</guid>
		<pubDate>Sun, 11 Feb 2001 09:45:17 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>hijinx</dc:creator>		<category>brokenlink</category>		<category>news</category>		<category>genome</category>		<category>science</category>		<category>biology</category>
	</item>	<item>
		<title>By: hijinx</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/5795/#49144</link>	
		<description>In addition, the article reveals that race is (surprise!) not a scientific concept, which is kind of a scientific &quot;duh&quot; to me.  Also of note is that males are generally &quot;responsible&quot; for mutations of the base genomes.

While the amount of genes being fewer than expected doesn&apos;t make things easier, it means that we might not be as high up on the ol&apos; scale as we thought.  I haven&apos;t been following any of this up until now, but I find it utterly fascinating.</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:www.metafilter.com,2001:site.5795-49144</guid>
		<pubDate>Sun, 11 Feb 2001 09:47:33 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>hijinx</dc:creator>
	</item>	<item>
		<title>By: muppetboy</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/5795/#49157</link>	
		<description>Perhaps there will be a new book soon &quot;Of Men and Mice&quot;</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:www.metafilter.com,2001:site.5795-49157</guid>
		<pubDate>Sun, 11 Feb 2001 12:52:06 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>muppetboy</dc:creator>
	</item>	<item>
		<title>By: stbalbach</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/5795/#49163</link>	
		<description>Washington Post has a good front-page article

http://washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/articles/A54653-2001Feb10.html
</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:www.metafilter.com,2001:site.5795-49163</guid>
		<pubDate>Sun, 11 Feb 2001 13:43:59 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>stbalbach</dc:creator>
	</item>	<item>
		<title>By: fiery</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/5795/#49227</link>	
		<description>stbalbach&apos;s contribution is a far superior article, I highly reccomend it. Thanks stbalbach.</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:www.metafilter.com,2001:site.5795-49227</guid>
		<pubDate>Mon, 12 Feb 2001 00:14:32 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>fiery</dc:creator>
	</item>	<item>
		<title>By: beth</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/5795/#49333</link>	
		<description>Keep in mind that in order for our genes to express themselves properly, they require a human maternal environment during the embronic and fetal stages.
&lt;p&gt;That is, a lot of what happens is enabled by the complex environment of the human womb, which provides the context for the baby&apos;s initial development.&lt;p&gt;That greatly reduces the number of genes needed compared to, say, frogs, which aren&apos;t warm-blooded and must have a large number of proteins coded for in their DNA to handle various conditions under which they might develop. If the temperature is in a certain range, they&apos;ll need one enzyme, but if it&apos;s a couple degrees warmer, they&apos;ll need a different one, and so on. With the constancy of a warm human womb to hang out in, the number of instructions needed decreases - the DNA code can make assumptions about the developmental environment, as it were.&lt;p&gt;

Plus, add chaos theory, and there ya go. Or, here we are.
</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:www.metafilter.com,2001:site.5795-49333</guid>
		<pubDate>Mon, 12 Feb 2001 11:10:31 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>beth</dc:creator>
	</item>	<item>
		<title>By: rodii</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/5795/#49393</link>	
		<description>Very nice, Beth. There&apos;s  good discussion of all that in &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/ASIN/0140178740/103-9565410-8556629&quot;&gt;&quot;The Collapse of Chaos&quot;&lt;/a&gt; by Ian Stewart and Jack Cohen, by the way.

I love the fact that we have only 60% as many genes as *rice*.</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:www.metafilter.com,2001:site.5795-49393</guid>
		<pubDate>Mon, 12 Feb 2001 16:38:17 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>rodii</dc:creator>
	</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
