iPods seem to have few of the properties that make Big Macs good(-ish) for PPP comparisons like this. Given that the Big Mac index is light-hearted rather than authoritative (the Economist describes it as arguably the world's most accurate financial indicator to be based on a fast-food item), I'm not sure I can see much point in this, other than as a publicity stunt by someone. posted by matthewr at 8:55 AM on January 24, 2007
I read "big Mac index" as "large Apple-manufactured computer index". I guess Steve Jobs's reality distortion field finally got me. posted by tehloki at 9:01 AM on January 24, 2007
I'm also holding out for a "Wii index". posted by tehloki at 9:03 AM on January 24, 2007
Almost every page in the "Big Mac index" link seems to be a economist subscriber/ pay link. posted by boo_radley at 9:36 AM on January 24, 2007
I'm quite enamoured by the shamelessness of this publicity stunt. As econmoists they must know that the price of an iPod = US price + 5-25% profit for local Apple affiliate + sales tax, which is indicative of nothing, so they might as well have put out a press release reading "mumble mumble mumble iPod mumble mumble DIGG THIS." posted by cillit bang at 9:37 AM on January 24, 2007
How about an Izod Index? The more self-important people wearing overpriced, conspicuously logoed casualwear, the closer the economy is to a "market correction." A sufficient volume of "popped" collars would indicate the urgent need for a currency devaluation. More than one gaudy designer watch being worn on any given wrist? IMF bailout or total economic ruin - your pick. posted by gompa at 9:41 AM on January 24, 2007
As econmoists they must know...
They're just trying to dampen expectations posted by Abiezer at 9:54 AM on January 24, 2007
How about an Andechs Index? We'll tie the market to fantastic monk-brewed dopplebock. posted by cortex at 10:12 AM on January 24, 2007
mumble mumble mumble iPod mumble mumble
Wow, you're good. I bet you get a writing offer from Time within the hour! posted by drjimmy11 at 10:16 AM on January 24, 2007
Was that an actual, genuine attempt at a sarcasting zing? Because it doesn't really scan as an ironic run-with-the-joke non-zing, but it'd be a very weird, petty, out-of-the-blue response if its credulous. posted by cortex at 10:26 AM on January 24, 2007
Sarcasting! Brilliant! posted by cortex at 10:26 AM on January 24, 2007
I look forward to the day of online sarcasts with sar-s-s feeds. posted by tehloki at 10:57 AM on January 24, 2007
And union regs will require network TV shows to employ sarcasting directors. posted by cortex at 11:00 AM on January 24, 2007
I have my own index. It's calculated based on the amount of money that people pay me to come and visit their country. So far it's holding steady at 0. Long-term predictions are looking good! posted by blue_beetle at 11:14 AM on January 24, 2007
Nyet nyet! Fast food is prepared using some degree of local ingredients and is a daily [ralph] consumption item, whereas an iPod is manufactured in one region, shipped all over, and has a potent used resale market. Poor index. posted by CynicalKnight at 11:59 AM on January 24, 2007
CynicalKnight, actually, the Big Mac index measures cost of living. This iPod index measures currency convertibility, and is probably a good (if too-knowingly hip) way to measure it.
At least, it's hipper than measuring everything against a dollar. posted by dhartung at 12:17 PM on January 24, 2007
I would do something like this this when I was in my 20s, when in an effort to give money a value I could understand, I measured everything by how it compared to the price of a new CD. It's weird but it worked. posted by Skygazer at 12:35 PM on January 24, 2007
dhartung: The Big Mac index light-heartedly attempts to measure PPP, not cost of living. The iPod is a really really bad way to measure PPP for various reasons (though it does have the advantage over the Big Mac of being, to an extent, tradeable). posted by matthewr at 1:42 PM on January 24, 2007
« Older In the past, battlefields were loud. Death came i... | "For me, it's a great vic... Newer »
This thread has been archived and is closed to new comments
posted by matthewr at 8:55 AM on January 24, 2007