Comments on: A delightfully nerdy page for nerds

A delightfully nerdy page for nerds

sergeant sandwich — Sun, 28 Jan 2007 06:51:35 -0800

professor emeritus of engineering at the University of Denver, has an incredibly rich and deep personal webpage, which includes such gems as Latin for mountain men, the correct corn-hog ratio, travel by brachistochrone, anomalous sound propagation and the guns of Barisal, and about a billion other awesomely nerdy topics.

By: sergeant sandwich

sergeant sandwich — Sun, 28 Jan 2007 06:55:06 -0800

dammit. last link was supposed to go here!

By: The Deej

The Deej — Sun, 28 Jan 2007 07:32:58 -0800

Just remember, if you have a dicky ticker, you shouldn't travel by brontosauruschrome! Thanks, SS, this is like a nerd power-up.

By: carter

carter — Sun, 28 Jan 2007 08:13:15 -0800

Excellent stuff, thanks sarge!

By: eriko

eriko — Sun, 28 Jan 2007 08:24:07 -0800

Rocketh like Docketh. Okay, that was lame, but it's sunday morning. Good links.

By: jayder

jayder — Sun, 28 Jan 2007 08:40:13 -0800

This caught my eye: The domain .com contains very nasty sites, normally with very poor information, that should be visited with care. The appearance of multiple cookies is a giveaway of criminal or commercial intent, so set your browser security at least to Medium. Internet information can be very disappointing. It is a shame that such a powerful medium has been so debased. This guy needs to say goodbye to 1994, and join us in the twenty-first century.

By: languagehat

languagehat — Sun, 28 Jan 2007 08:53:55 -0800

From the "Latin" link:

As Alexander Humez will inform you, Latin is an Indo-European language, and gives a kind of history that is often elaborated, but is pure wind. Linguists would almost claim to know the Indo-European flag, and the history of its people, but there is really nothing there, not even the Caucasian origin of the race. All that they have are existing (including classical) languages, and from this they construct fables about how they must have originated, like the tale of how the elephant got his trunk. It is a good story, with much intelligent reasoning, but it is just a story and one can learn no causes from it. No Indo-European survives, and no appropriate wanderings are historically attested. Scraps of information are swept together into a heap that it is hoped will pass for a science. How languages change with time is especially obscure, though what is well-described. The Romans thought Latin descended from Greek, but it did not, it is merely cognate. Modern "romance" languages are not evolved forms of Latin, but created languages that existed in parallel with Latin. Each has its peculiar ontogeny, which is mainly unknown. Anglo-Saxon is a Germanic language, but English, not being Anglo-Saxon or any evolution of it, is not. English was created by people who spoke Anglo-Saxon (and other tongues), however, so the similarity is not unreasonable. In fact, such classifications are largely useless and devoid of meaning. At least so I believe.

You believe wrongly, and further, you sound like the kind of fool who thinks he can form meaningful judgments on areas of study he knows nothing about, and the entire passage is an illogical jumble of half-baked thoughts and misunderstandings. I shall repay your contempt by not investigating your Latin lessons. Nice post, nonetheless!

By: odinsdream

odinsdream — Sun, 28 Jan 2007 09:04:14 -0800

This guy is an ass.

By: IndigoJones

IndigoJones — Sun, 28 Jan 2007 09:44:37 -0800

Another excellent supplement is Alexander and Nicholas Humez's Latin for People--Latina pro Populo Real Latinists scathed that book.

By: dansdata

dansdata — Sun, 28 Jan 2007 09:58:35 -0800

You believe wrongly, and further, you sound like... ...another tragic case of Engineers' Disease, in which high competence in one area of study leads one to believe that one must be similarly competent in other areas, despite the fact that one has not actually invested nearly as much study in those other areas. Lots of people besides engineers suffer from this ailment, of course. But engineers do seem to be particularly likely to, especially when they're getting on a bit, suddenly come up with Grand Unified Theorems, great insights into historical events, bold new ideas about astronomy, and so on.

By: SPrintF

SPrintF — Sun, 28 Jan 2007 09:59:46 -0800

The favorite Indian process was to soak the corn in wood ash lye until the hull softened and expanded, producing hominy. When boiled, this can be very palatable, and was a very familiar dish. At last, something my great-great-grandmother would have recognized as food.

By: Chuckles

Chuckles — Sun, 28 Jan 2007 10:39:53 -0800

The relation between supply and demand is more complex than the pronouncements of a pseudo-science imply.

By: sparkletone

sparkletone — Sun, 28 Jan 2007 11:07:17 -0800

Real Latinists scathed that book. I'd have gone for the Colbert-ish "The Latinistas."

By: Falconetti

Falconetti — Sun, 28 Jan 2007 11:28:04 -0800

I think I sat next to this guy on a bus once.

By: jayder

jayder — Sun, 28 Jan 2007 18:31:49 -0800

...another tragic case of Engineers' Disease, in which high competence in one area of study leads one to believe that one must be similarly competent in other areas, despite the fact that one has not actually invested nearly as much study in those other areas. Nice way of putting it. I find that people afflicted with Engineers' Disease are also likely to put together web sites with long, condescending instructions on how to use the site (such as the fact that you can click on the various links to access the materials on the site), and elaborate explanations of which browsers should be used, etc.

By: MotherTucker

MotherTucker — Mon, 29 Jan 2007 09:17:24 -0800

Although I did study Latin at the University of Denver, I never met Dr. Calvert.

By: IndigoJones

IndigoJones — Mon, 29 Jan 2007 10:52:10 -0800

I'd have gone for the Colbert-ish "The Latinistas." As would I, had I thought of it. Damn!